A consecutive modal pushover procedure for estimating the seismic demands of tall buildings

Engineering Structures

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 591-599

  Poursha, Mehdi ^a   Khoshnoudian, Faramarz ^a   Moghadam, A S ^b  

^a AMIRKABIR UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

^b INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND SEISMOLOGY IIEES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Consecutive modal pushover (CMP) procedure; Higher mode effects; Seismic demands; Tall buildings

Indexed keywords

APARTMENT HOUSES; EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; EARTHQUAKES; MODAL ANALYSIS; NANOTECHNOLOGY; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMOLOGY; TALL BUILDINGS;

BUILDING EVALUATIONS; CONSECUTIVE MODAL PUSHOVER (CMP) PROCEDURE; DESIGN VERIFICATIONS; DIFFERENT HEIGHTS; FUNDAMENTAL VIBRATIONS; HIGHER-MODE EFFECTS; MODAL PUSHOVER ANALYSES; MODE RESPONSES; NONLINEAR RESPONSE HISTORY ANALYSIS; NONLINEAR STATIC PROCEDURES; PUSHOVER ANALYSIS; SEISMIC DEMANDS; SPECIAL STEELS; STRUCTURAL RESPONSES;

BUILDINGS;

BUILDING; ESTIMATION METHOD; RESPONSE ANALYSIS; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STEEL STRUCTURE; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE; VIBRATION;

EID: 57749170459     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.10.009     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. AISC-ASD. Manual of steel construction, allowable stress design. Chicago (IL): American Institute of Steel Construction; 1989
2. Applied Technology Council, ATC-40. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. vol. 1-2. Redwood City (California); 1996
3. Aydinoglu M.N. An incremental response spectrum analysis procedure on inelastic spectral displacements for multi-mode seismic performance evaluation. Bull Earthq Eng 1 (2003) 3-36
4. Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC). NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. FEMA-273, Washington (DC): Federal Emergency Management Agency; 1997
5. Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC). Pre-standard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. FEMA-356, Washington (DC): Federal Emergency Management Agency; 2000
6. Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC). NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures. FEMA-450, Washington (DC): Federal Emergency Management Agency; 2003
7. Chopra AK, Goel RK. Capacity-demand-diagram methods for estimating seismic deformation of inelastic structures: SDOF systems. PEER Report 1999/02. Berkeley: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California. 1999
8. Chopra A.K. Dynamics of structures. Theory and applications to earthquake engineering. 2nd ed. (2001), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (NJ)
9. Chopra AK, Goel RK. A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for buildings. PEER Report 2001/03. Berkeley: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Center, University of California. 2001
10. Chopra A.K., and Goel R.K. A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31 (2002) 561-582
11. Chopra A.K., and Goel R.K. A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demand for unsymmetric-plan buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 33 (2004) 903-927
12. Chopra A.K., Goel R.K., and Chintanapakdee C. Evaluation of a modified MPA procedure assuming higher modes as elastic to estimate seismic demands. Earthq Spectra 20 3 (2004) 757-778
13. Computers & Structures Incorporated (CSI). SAP 2000 NL. (USA, CA): Berkeley. 2004
14. Fajfar P., and Gaspersic P. The N2 method for the seismic damage analysis of RC buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25 (1996) 31-46
15. Fajfar P. Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 28 (1999) 979-993
16. Fajfar P. A nonlinear analysis method for performance based seismic design. Earthq Spectra 16 3 (2000) 573-592
17. Goel R.K., and Chopra A.K. Evaluation of modal and FEMA pushover analysis: SAC Buildings. Earthq Spectra 20 1 (2004) 225-254
18. Jan T.S., Liu M.W., and Kao Y.C. An upper-bound pushover analysis procedure for estimating the seismic demands of high-rise buildings. Eng Struct 26 (2004) 117-128
19. Jing Jiang S., Ono T., Yangang Z., and Wei W. Lateral load pattern in pushover analysis. Earthq Eng Eng Vibration 2 1 (2003) 99-107
20. Kalkan E., and Kunnath S.K. Adaptive modal combination procedure for nonlinear static analysis of building structures. ASCE, J Struct Eng 132 11 (2006) 1721-1731
21. Kim S., and D'Amore E. Pushover analysis procedure in earthquake engineering. Earthq Spectra 15 (1999) 417-434
22. Krawinkler H., and Seneviratna G.D.P.K. Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation. Eng Struct 20 4-6 (1998) 452-462
23. Moghadam A.S. A pushover procedure for tall buildings. Proc. 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering (2002), Elsevier Science Ltd, London (United Kingdom) paper 395
24. Mwafy A.M., and Elnashai A.S. Static pushover versus dynamic analysis of R/C buildings. Eng Struct 23 (2001) 407-424
25. Poursha M, Khoshnoudian F, Moghadam AS. Assessment of modal pushover analysis and conventional nonlinear static procedure with load distributions of Federal Emergency Management Agency for high-rise buildings. J Struct Des Tall Spec Build; 2008 (in press) corrected proof available online
26. Sasaki KK, Freeman SA, Paret TF. Multi-mode pushover procedure (MMP) - a method to identify the effects of higher modes in a pushover analysis. In: Proceedings of 6th US nat. conf. on earthq. eng., Seattle (Washington); 1998
27. Standard No. 2800-05. Iranian code of practice for seismic resistant design of buildings. 3rd ed. Building and Housing Research Centre, Iran; 2005
28. Tso W.K., and Moghadam A.S. Pushover procedure for seismic analysis of buildings. Progress in Struct Eng Mat 1 3 (1998) 337-344