The development of enantiostyly

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 90, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 183-195

  Jesson, Linley K ^a,b   Kang, Julie ^a   Wagner, Sara L ^a   Barreit, Spencer C H ^a   Dengler, Nancy G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Allometry; Constraint; Enantiostyly; Floral development; Inflorescence architecture

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; EVOLUTION; FLORAL TRAIT;

CYANELLA; CYANELLA LUTEA; DILATRIS; DILATRIS CORYMBOSA; HETERANTHERA; HETERANTHERA MEXICANA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; MONOCHORIA; MONOCHORIA AUSTRALASICA; PHILYDRUM LANUGINOSUM; SOLANUM; SOLANUM ROSTRATUM; WACHENDORFIA; WACHENDORFIA PANICULATA;

EID: 0038054976     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.90.2.183     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. BARRETT, S. C. H., A. M. BAKER, AND L. K. JESSON. 2000. Mating strategies in monocotyledons. In K. Wilson and D. Morrison [eds.], Systematics and evolution of monocots, 258-269. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, Australia.
2. BARRETT, S. C. H., L. K. JESSON, AND A. M. BAKER. 2000. The evolution and function of stylar polymorphisms in flowering plants. Annals of Botany 85(Supplement A): 253-265.
3. CARPENTER, R., AND E. S. COEN. 1990. Floral homeotic mutations produced by transposon-mutagenesis in Antirrhinum majus. Genes and Development 4: 1483-1493.
4. CHARLTON, W. A. 1998. Pendulum symmetry. In R. V. Jean and D. Barabe [eds.], Symmetry in plants. World Scientific, Singapore.
5. COYNE, J. 1987. Lack of response to selection for directional asymmetry in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Heredity 78: 119.
6. DIGGLE, P. K. 1992. Development and the evolution of plant reproductive characters. In R. Wyatt [ed.], Ecology and evolution of plant reproduction. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA.
7. DULBERGER, R. 1981. The floral biology of Cassia didymobotrya and C. auriculata (Caesalpinaceae). American Journal of Botany 68: 1350-1360.
8. ENDRESS, P. 1999. Symmetry in flowers: diversity and evolution. International Journal of Plant Science 160: S3-S23.
9. FAIVRE, A. E. 2000. Ontogenetic differences in heterostylous plants and implications for development from a herkogamous ancestor. Evolution 54: 847-858.
10. GIURFA, M., A. DAFNI, AND P. R. NEAL. 1999. Floral symmetry and its role in plant-pollinator systems. International Journal of Plant Sciences 160: S41-S50.
11. GRAHAM, S. W., AND S. C. H. BARRETT. 1995. Phylogenetic systematics of Pontederiales: implications for breeding system evolution. In P. J. Rudall, P. J. Cribb, D. G. Cutler, and C. J. Humphries [eds.], Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution, 415-451. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
12. GUERRANT, E. O. 1989. Early maturity, small flowers and autogamy: a developmental connection? In J. H. Bock and Y. B. Linhart [eds.], The evolutionary ecology of plants, 61-84. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
13. HUFFORD, L. 1988a. The evolution of floral morphological diversity in Eucnide (Loasaceae): the implications of modes and timing of ontogenetic changes on phylogenetic distribution. In P. Leins, S. C. Tucker, and P. K. Endress [eds.], Aspects of floral development, 103-119. Schweizerbartsche Verlagbuchhandlung, Stuttgart, Germany.
14. HUFFORD, L. 1988b. Potential roles of scaling and post-anthesis developmental changes in the evolution of floral forms in Eucnide (Loasaceae). Nordic Journal of Botany 8: 147-157.
15. IYENGAR, M. O. 1923. On the biology of the flowers of Monochoria. Journal of the Indian Botanical Society 3: 170-177.
16. JESSON, L. K. 2002. The evolution and functional significance of enantiostyly in flowering plants. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
17. JESSON, L. K., AND S. C. H. BARRETT. 2002a. The genetics of mirror-image flowers. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 269: 1835-1839.
18. JESSON, L. K., AND S. C. H. BARRETT. 2002b. Solving the puzzle of mirror-image flowers. Nature 417: 707.
19. JESSON, L. K., AND S. C. H. BARRETT. 2002c. Enantiostyly in Wachendorfia (Haemodoraceae): the influence of reproductive systems on the maintenance of the polymorphism. American Journal of Botany 89: 253-263.
20. KNUTH, P. 1906. Handbook of flower pollination. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
21. KOHN, J. R., S. W. GRAHAM, B. MORTON, J. J. DOYLE, AND S. C. H. BARRETT. 1996. Reconstruction of the evolution of reproductive characters in Pontederiaceae using phylogenetic evidence from chloroplast DNA restriction-site variation. Evolution 50: 1454-1469.
22. LLOYD, D. G., AND C. J. WEBB. 1992. The selection of heterostyly. In S. C. H. Barrett [ed.], Evolution and function of heterostyly, 179-208. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
23. LORD, E. M. 1981. Cleistogamy: a tool for the study of floral morphogenesis, function and evolution. Botanical Review 47: 421-449.
24. LUO, D., R. CARPENTER, C. VINCENT, L. COPSEY, J., AND E. COEN. 1996. Origin of floral asymmetry in Antirrhinum. Nature 383: 794-799.
25. MATHSOFT. 1997. S-Plus. Data Analysis Products Division. Mathsoft, Seattle, Washington, USA.
26. MAYNARD SMITH, J., R. BURIAN, S. KAUFFMAN, P. ALBERCH, J. CAMPBELL, B. GOODWIN, R. LANDE, D. RAUP, AND L. WOLPERT. 1985. Developmental constraints and evolution. Quarterly Review of Biology 60: 265-287.
27. MAYNARD SMITH, J., AND K. C. SONDHI. 1960. The genetics of a pattern. Genetics 45: 1034-1050.
28. NETER, J., W. WASSERMAN, AND M. H. KUTNER. 1990. Applied linear statistical models. Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, New Jersey, USA.
29. PURNELL, D. J., AND J. N. J. THOMPSON. 1973. Selection for asymmetrical bias in a behavioral character of Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 31: 401-405.
30. REE, R. H., AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 1999. Inferring rates of change in flower symmetry in asterid angiosperms. Systematic Biology 48: 633-641.
31. RENNER, S. S., AND R. E. RICKLEFS. 1995. Dioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants. American Journal of Botany 82: 596-606.
32. RICHARDS, J. H., AND S. C. H. BARRETT. 1984. The developmental basis of tristyly in Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae), American Journal of Botany 71: 1347-1363.
33. RICHARDS, J. H., AND S. C. H. BARRETT. 1987. Development of tristyly in Pontederia cordata (Pontederiaceae) I. Mature floral structure and patterns of relative growth of reproductive organs. American Journal of Botany 74: 1831-1841.
34. RICHARDS, J. H., AND S. C. H. BARRETT. 1992. Development of heterostyly. In S. C. H. Barrett [ed.], Evolution and function of heterostyly, 85-128. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
35. RICHARDS, J. H., AND S. KOPTUR. 1993. Floral variation in Guettarda scabra (Rubiaceae). American Journal of Botany 80: 31-40.
36. SOKAL, R. R., AND F. J. ROHLF. 1995. Biometry. Freeman, New York, New York, USA.
37. SOLTIS, P. S., D. E. SOLTIS, AND M. W. CHASE. 1999. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from multiple genes as a tool for comparative biology. Nature 402: 402-404.
38. TODD, J. E. 1882. On the flowers of Solanum rostratum and Cassia chamaecrista. American Naturalist 16: 281-287.
39. TUCKER, S. C. 1999. Evolutionary lability of symmetry in early floral development. International Journal of Plant Sciences 160: S25-S39.
40. TUINSTRA, E. J., G. DE JONG, AND W. SCHARLOO. 1990. Lack of response to family selection for directional asymmetry in Drosophila melanogaster: left and right are not distinguished in development. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 241: 146-152.
41. WAKE, D. B. 1991. Homoplasy: the result of natural selection, or evidence of design limitation. American Naturalist 138: 543-567.