Enhancing community safety and security through understanding interagency collaboration in cyber-terrorism exercises

Administration and Society

Volumn 40, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 852-875

  Solansky, Stephanie T ^a   Beck, Tammy E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON VICTORIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Beliefs; Collective mind; Cyber terrorism; Interagency collaboration

Indexed keywords

EID: 57349115362     PISSN: 00953997     EISSN: 15523039     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0095399708326345     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2001). After the network is formed: Process, power, and performance. In M. Mandell (Ed.), Getting results through collaboration: Networks and network structures for public policy and management (pp. 11-29). Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
2. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1970). The prediction of behavior from attitudinal and normative variables. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 466-487.
3. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1973). Attitudinal and normative variables as predictors of specific behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 41-57.
4. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5. Aldrich, H., & Whetten, D.A. (1981). Organization-sets, action-sets, and networks: Making the most of simplicity. In P. C. Nystrom & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of organizational design (Vol. 1, pp. 385-408). New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Bardach, E. (1998). Getting agencies to work together: The practice and theory of managerial craftsmanship. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
7. Comfort, L.K. (2002). Rethinking security: Organizational fragility in extreme events. Public Administration Review, 62, 98-107.
8. Costa, A.C. (2003). Understanding the nature and the antecedents of trust within work teams. In B. Nooteboom & F. Six (Eds.), The trust process in organizations (pp. 105-124). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
9. Crowston, K. (1998). Coordination and collective mind in software requirements development. IBM Systems Journal, 37, 227-246.
10. Evan, W.M. (1966). The organization-set: Toward a theory of interorganizational relations. In J. D. Thompson (Ed.), Organizational design and research: Approaches to organizational design (pp. 173-192). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
11. Feldman, J.M., & Lynch, J.G. (1988). Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 421-435.
12. Fishbein, M. (1967). Attitude and the prediction of behavior. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Readings in attitude theory and measurement (pp. 477-492). New York: John Wiley.
13. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1974). Attitudes toward objects as predictors of single and multiple behavioral criteria. Psychological Review, 81, 59-74.
14. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
15. Gauvain, M. (2001). The social context of cognitive development. New York: Guilford.
16. Gibson, C.B. (2001). From knowledge accumulation to accommodation: Cycles of collective cognition in work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 121-134.
17. Goes, J.B., & Park, S.H. (1997). Interorganizational links and innovation: The case of hospital services. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 673-696.
18. Green, L.V., & Kolesar, P.J. (2004). Improving emergency responsiveness with management science. Management Science, 50, 1001-1014.
19. Hardy, C., Lawrence, T.B., & Grant, D. (2005). Discourse and collaboration: The role of conversations and collective identity. Academy of Management Review, 30 (1). 58-77.
20. Jenkins, W.O. (2006). Collaboration over adaptation: The case for interoperable communications in homeland security. Public Administration Review, 66, 319-321.
21. Jones, P.L. (2006, October 20). Homeland security: Opportunities exist to enhance collaboration at 24/7 operations centers staffed by multiple DHS agencies (Publication No. GAO-07-89). Retrieved October 3, 2008, from General Accounting Office Reports Online: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d0789.pdf
22. Kamensky, J., Burlin, T., & Abramson, M. (2004). Networks and partnerships: Collaborating to achieve results no one can achieve alone. In J. Kamensky & T. Burlin (Eds.), Collaboration using partnerships and networks (pp. 3-20). New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
23. Kapucu, N. (2006). Public-nonprofit partnerships for collective action in dynamic contexts of emergencies. Public Administration, 84, 205-220.
24. Kerlinger, F.N., & Lee, H.B. (2000). Foundations of behavioral research (4 th ed.). Stamford, CT: Thomson Learning.
25. Kiefer, J.J., & Montjoy, R.S. (2006). Incrementalism before the storm: Network performance for the evacuation of New Orleans. Public Administration Review, 66, 122-130.
26. Klitgaard, R., & Treverton, G.F. (2004). Assessing partnerships: New forms of collaboration. In J. Kamensky & T. Burlin (Eds.), Collaboration using partnerships and networks (pp. 21-59). New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
27. Larson, J.R., & Christensen, C. (1993). Groups as problem solving units: Toward a new meaning of social cognition. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 5-30.
28. Lawrence, T.B., Hardy, C., & Phillips, N. (2002). Institutional effects of interorganizational collaboration: The emergence of proto-institutions. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 281-290.
29. Lewin, K. (1938). The conceptual representation and the measurement of psychological forces. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
30. McConnell, G.W. (2001). Georgia: Olympic efforts in preparing for terrorism. Spectrum: The Journal of State Government (Fall), 11.
31. McEntire, D.A. (2002). Coordinating multi-organizational responses to disaster: Lessons from the March 28, 2000, Fort Worth tornado. Disaster Prevention and Management, 11, 369-379.
32. McLoughlin, D. (1985). A framework for integrated emergency management. Public Administration Review, 45 (Special Issue), 165-172.
33. Rodriguez, C., Langley, A., Beland, F., & Denis, J. (2007). Governance, power, and mandated collaboration in an interorganizational network. Administration & Society, 39, 150-193.
34. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R.L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (2 nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
35. Schroeder, A., Wamsley, G., & Ward, R. (2001). The evolution of emergency management in America: From a painful past to a promising but uncertain future. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Handbook of crisis and emergency management (pp. 357-418). New York: Marcel Dekker.
36. Smith, K.G., Carroll, S.J., & Ashford, S.J. (1995). Intra- and interorganizational cooperation: Toward a research agenda. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (1). 7-23.
37. Spector, P.E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend ? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 221-233.
38. Thacher, D. (2004). Interorganizational partnerships as inchoate hierarchies: A case study of the community security initiative. Administration and Society, 36 (1). 91-127.
39. Tolman, E.C. (1932). Purposive behavior in animals and men. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
40. Tottossy, C., & Swallow, E. (2005, January). Public safety overcomes communication issues. Wireless Systems Designs, pp. 10-11.
41. Tyre, M.J., & von Hippel, E. (1997). The situated nature of adaptive learning in organizations. Organization Science, 8 (1). 71-83.
42. U.S. General Accounting Office. (2004). Project SAFECOM: Key cross-agency emergency communications effort requires stronger collaboration (Publication No. GAO-04-494). Retrieved October 3, 2008, from General Accounting Office Report to Congressional Requesters Online: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d04494. pdf
43. Van De Ven, A. H. (1976). On the nature, formation, and maintenance of relations among organizations. Academy of Management Review, 1 (4). 24-36.
44. van Fenema, P.C. (2005). Collaborative elasticity and breakdowns in high reliability organizations: Contributions from distributed cognition and collective mind theory. Cognition, Technology, and Work, 7 (2). 134-140.
45. Warren, R. (1967). The interorganizational field as a focus for investigation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12, 398-419.
46. Waugh, W.L. (2001). Managing terrorism as an environmental hazard. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Handbook of crisis and emergency management (pp. 659-676). New York: Marcel Dekker.
47. Waugh, W.L., & Streib, G. (2006). Collaboration and leadership for effective emergency management. Public Administration Review, 66, 131-140.
48. Weber, E.P., Lovrich, N.P., & Gaffney, M.J. (2007). Assessing collaborative capacity in a multidimensional world. Administration & Society, 39, 194-220.
49. Weick, K.E., & Roberts, K.H. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 357-381.
50. White, G.B. (2005). Introduction and history: A cyber terrorist exercise. Unpublished manuscript, University of Texas at San Antonio.
51. Wise, C.R. (2002). Organizing for homeland security. Public Administration Review, 62 (2). 131-144.
52. Wise, C.R. (2006). Organizing for homeland security after Katrina: Is adaptive management what's missing ? Public Administration Review, 66, 302-318.
53. Wise, C.R., & Nader, R. (2002). Organizing the federal system for homeland security: Problems, issues, and dilemmas. Public Administration Review, 62 (4). 44-57.
54. Yoo, Y., & Kanawattanachai, P. (2001). Developments of transactive memory systems and collective mind in virtual teams. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9, 187-208.