Organizing the federal system for homeland security: Problems, issues, and dilemmas

Public Administration Review

Volumn 62, Issue SPEC. ISS., 2002, Pages 44-57

  Wise, Charles R ^a   Nader, Rania ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345851465     PISSN: 00333352     EISSN: 15406210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1540-6210.62.s1.8     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Advisory Panel to Assess Domestic Response Capabilities for Terrorism Involving Weapons of Mass Destruction. 2002. Third Annual Report. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
2. CNN. 2001. Bridge Threat. Available at www.Cnn.com/2001/US/11/02/inv. bridge.threat/. Accessed May 15, 2002.
3. Donohue, Laura K., and Juliette N. Kayyem. 2001. The Rise of the Counterterrorist States. Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. BCSIA Discussion Paper 2001-1; ESDP Discussion Paper ESP-2001-01.
4. Edwards-Winslow, Francis. 2002. Preparing for WMD/NBC Events in San Jose: Intergovernmental Relations. Paper presented at the American Society for Public Administration National Conference, March 24, Phoenix, Arizona.
5. Executive Session on Domestic Preparedness (ESDP). 2002. Homeland Security: Domestic Preparedness after Sept. 11, 2001. Third Annual Report to the President and Congress of the Advisory Panel to Assess Domestic Response Capabilities for Terrorism Involving Weapons of Mass Destruction. Appendix H. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
6. Fairbanks, Frank. 2002. Presentation at the American Society for Public Administration National Conference, March 24, Phoenix, Arizona.
7. Falcone, Santa, and Zhiyong Lan. 1997. Intergovernmental Relations and Productivity. Public Administration Review 57(4): 319-22.
8. Falkenrath, Richard A. 2000. The Problems of Preparedness: Challenges Facing the U.S. Domestic Preparedness Program. Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. BCSIA Discussion Paper 2000-28.
9. Freedberg, Sydney J., Jr. 2001. Homeland Defense Effort Breaks Down Walls of Government. GovExec.com, October 19. Available at www.Govexec.com/dailyfed/ 1001/101901nj1.htm. Accessed April 25, 2002.
10. _. 2002. Pentagon Juggles Politics of Creating North American Command. GovExec.com, March 22. Available at www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0302/032202nj1a. htm. Accessed May 17, 2002.
11. General Accounting Office (GAO). 1996. Federal Grants: Design Improvements Could Help Federal Resources Go Further. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. GAO/AIMD-97-7.
12. _. 2001a. Combating Terrorism: Selected Challenges and Related Recommendations. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. GAO-01-8222001.
13. _. 2001b. Disaster Assistance: Improvement Needed in Disaster Declaration Criteria and Eligibility Assurance Procedures. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. GAO-01-837.
14. Harris, Shane. 2002. Coming Together. March 1. Available at www.govexec.com/features/0302/0302s2.htm. Accessed April 29, 2002.
15. Hinton, Henry L., Jr. 2002, Homeland Security: Progress Made, More Direction and Partnership Sought. Testimony before the U.S. House, Committee on Government Reform, Subcommittee on National Security, Veteran Affairs, and International Relations. March 12. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office. GAO-02-490T.
16. Kayyem, Juliette N. 2001. U.S. Preparations for Biological Terrorism: Legal Limitations and the Need for National Planning. Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. BCSIA Discussion Paper 2001-4.
17. Keith, Leon D. 2001. Davis Reveals Threat to Bridges. Available at www.sacbee.com/content/news. Accessed May 28, 2002.
18. Kincaid, John. 1999. De Facto Devolution and Urban Defunding: The Priority of Persons over Places. Journal of Urban Affairs 21(2): 135-67.
19. Marshall, Lynn, and Tom Gorman. 2001. Now Portland Comes in for Questioning. Available at www.latimes.com/news/nationwide/nation/la-113001port. stoiy. Accessed May 16, 2002.
20. McKay, David H. 1982. Fiscal Federalism, Professionalism and the Transformation of American State Government. Public Administration 60(Spring): 10-22.
21. Mueller, Robert S. III. 2002. Remarks at the annual meeting of the Police Executive Research Forum, May 9, Phoenix, Arizona.
22. Nathan, Richard P., and Fred C. Doolittte. 1985. Federal Grants: Giving and Taking Away. Political Science Quarterly 100(1): 53-74.
23. National Conference on State Legislatures. 2002. Protecting Democracy: America's Legislatures Respond. Washington DC: National Conference on State Legislatures.
24. National League of Cities (NLC). 2002. NLC Homeland Security Group Outlines City Needs. Available at www.nlc.org/nlc_org/site/newsroom/ nations_cites_weekly. Accessed March 8, 2002.
25. Online Newshour. 2002. Warnings and Worries. May 21. Available at www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/terrorism/jan-june02/warn_5-21.html. Accessed May 22, 2002.
26. Posner, Paul L. 2002. Combating Terrorism: Intergovernmental Partnership in a National Strategy to Enhance State and Local Preparedness. Testimony before the U.S. House, Committee on Government Reform, Subcommittee on Government Efficiency, Financial Management, and Intergovernmental Relations. March 22. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office. GAO-02-547T.
27. Rich, Michael J. 1989. Distributive Politics and the Allocation of Federal Grants. American Political Science Review 83(1): 193-213.
28. Seigle, Greg. 2002. Justice Department Slow to Get Anti-Terrroism Funding to States. Available at www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0402/042402gsnl.htm. Accessed April 25, 2002.
29. Shapek, Raymond A. 1981. Managing Federalism: Evolution and Development of the Grant-in-Aid System. Charlottesville, NC: Community Collaborators.
30. Stine, William F. 1994. Is Local Government Revenue Response to Federal Aid Symmetrical? Evidence from Pennsylvania County Governments in an Era of Retrenchment. National Tax Journal 47(4): 799-816.
31. Stratton, Ruth M. 1989. Disaster Relief: The Politics of Intergovernmental Relations, Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
32. U.S. Commission on National Security/21st Century (USCNS). 2001. Road Map for National Security: Imperative for Change. Washington, DC: USCNS.
33. U.S. Department of Defense (DoD). 2002. Special Briefing on the Unified Command Plan. Available at www.defenselink.mil/news/april2002/t04172002_to417sd. html. Accessed May 17, 2002.
34. U.S. House. 2001. Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management. Hearing on Combating Terrorism: Options to Improve the Federal Response. 107th Congress, 1st sess. April 24.
35. Walker, David. 1996. The Advent of Ambiguous Federalism and the Emergence of New Federalism III. Public Administration Review 56(3): 271-80.
36. Walters, Jonathan. 2001. Safety is Still a Local Issue. Governing 15(November): 12.
37. _. 2002. Frayed Connections. GovExec.com, March 1. Available at www.govexec.com/features/0302/0302story1.htm. Accessed May 17, 2002.
38. Wamsley, Gary L., and Aaron Schroeder. 1996. Escalating in a Quagmire. Public Administration Review 56(3): 235-44.
39. Whitman, Cameron. 2002. Many City Interests Face Cuts in President's Budget. National League of Cities, February 11. Available at http://wwww.nlc.org/nlc_org/site/newsroom. Accessed May 19, 2002.
40. Wise, Charles R. 1990. Public Service Configurations and Public Organizations: Public Organization Design in the Post-Privatization Era. Public Administration Review 50(6): 141-55.
41. _. 2002. Organizing for Homeland Security. Public Administration Review 62(2): 131-44.
42. Wright, Deil S. 1990. Federalism, Intergovernmental Relations, and Intergovernmental Management: Historical Reflection and Conceptual Comparisons. Public Administration Review 50(2): 168-78.
43. Yim, Randall A. 2002. National Preparedness: Integration of Federal, State, Local, and Private Sector Efforts Is Critical to an Effective National Strategy for Homeland Security. Testimony before the U.S. House, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office. GAO-02-621T.