Distributed pair programming: An empirical study

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3134, Issue , 2004, Pages 81-91

  Hanks, Brian F ^a  

^a University of California Santa Cruz   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERS;

EMPIRICAL STUDIES; INTRODUCTORY PROGRAMMING; PAIR-PROGRAMMING; STUDENT PERCEPTIONS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 33745791855     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-27777-4_9     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Laurie Williams and Robert Kessler. Pair Programming Illuminated. Addison-Wesley, 2002.
2. Alistair Cockburn and Laurie Williams. The costs and benefits of pair programming. In Giancarlo Succi and Michele Marchesi, editors, Extreme Programming Examined, pages 223 - 247. Addison-Wesley, 2001.
3. Laurie A. Williams. Strengthening the case for pair programming. IEEE Software, 17(4):19-25, July/August 2000.
4. Charlie McDowell, Linda Werner, Heather Bullock, and Julian Fernald. The impact of pair programming on student performance, perception and persistence. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2003), pages 602-607, May 3-10, 2003.
5. John T. Nosek. The case for collaborative programming. Communications of the ACM, 41(3):105-108, March 1998.
6. Charlie McDowell, Brian Hanks, and LindaWerner. Experimenting with pair programming in the classroom. In Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, 2003.
7. Brian Hanks and Charlie McDowell. Program quality with pair programming in CS1. To appear in Proceedings of the ninth annual conference on innovation and technology in computer science education (ITiCSE), June 28-30, 2004.
8. Judith Olson, Stephanie Teasley, Lisa Covi, and Gary Olson. The (currently) unique advantages of collocated work. In Pamela Hinds and Sara Kiesler, editors, Distributed Work, pages 113-135. The MIT Press, 2002.
9. Till Schummer and Jan Schummer. Support for distributed teams in extreme programming. In Giancarlo Succi and Michele Marchesi, editors, Extreme Programming Examined, pages 355-378. Addison-Wesley, 2001.
10. Frank Maurer. Supporting distributed extreme programming. In Extreme Programming and Agile Methods - XP/Agile Universe 2002, number 2418 in LNCS, pages 13-22. Springer, 2002.
11. Prashant Baheti, Edward Gehringer, and David Stotts. Exploring the efficacy of distributed pair programming. In Extreme Programming and Agile Methods - XP/Agile Universe 2002, number 2418 in LNCS, pages 208-220. Springer, 2002.
12. Gerardo Canfora, Aniello Cimitile, and Corrado Aaron Visaggio. Lessons learned about distributed pair programming: What are the knowledge needs to address? In Proceedings of the Twelfth IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE03), pages 314-319, 2003.
13. David Stotts, Laurie Williams, Nachiappan Nagappan, Preshant Baheti, Dennis Jen, and Anne Jackson. Virtual teaming: Experiments and experiences with distributed pair programming. In Extreme Programming and Agile Methods - XP/Agile Universe 2003, number 2753 in LNCS, pages 129-141. Springer, 2003.
14. Tristan Richardson, Quentin Stafford-Fraser, Kenneth R. Wood, and Andy Hopper. Virtual network computing. IEEE Internet Computing, 2(1):33-38, January-February 1998.
15. Saul Greenberg. Sharing views and interactions with single-user applications. ACM SIGOIS Bulletin, 11(2-3):227-237, April 1990.
16. Stephen Hayne, Mark Pendergast, and Saul Greenberg. Gesturing through cursors: Implementing multiple pointers in group support systems. In Proceedings of the 26th Hawaii International Conference on System Science, volume 4, pages 4-12, 1993
17. Saul Greenberg, Carl Gutwin, and Mark Roseman. Semantic telepointers for groupware. In Proceedings of the 6th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, pages 54-61, 1996.
18. Elena Rocco. Trust breaks down in electronic contexts but can be repaired by some initial face-to-face contact. In Proceedings of CHI 98, pages 496-502, 1998.