Curriculum-based measurement procedures to develop multiple-skill mathematics computation probes: Evaluation of random and stratified stimulus-set arrangements

School Psychology Review

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 387-400

  Christ, Theodore J ^a   Vining, Odell ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750542718     PISSN: 02796015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Brennan, R. L. (2000). (Mis)conceptions about generalizability theory. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 19, 5-10.
2. Brennan, R. L. (2001). Generalizability theory. New York: Springer-Verlag.
3. Brennan, R. L. (2003). Generalizability theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 105-107.
4. Christ, T. J. (2003). The effects of passage-difficulty on CBM progress monitoring outcomes: Stability and accuracy. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 63, 10. (UMI No. 4960)
5. Christ, T. J., Johnson-Gros, K., & Hintze, J. M. (2005). An examination of computational fluency: The reliability of curriculum-based outcomes within the context of educational decisions. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 615-622.
6. Crawford, L., Tindal, G., & Stieber, S. (2001). Using oral reading rate to predict student performance on state-wide achievement tests. Educational Assessment, 7, 303-323.
7. Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modem test theory. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace.
8. Cronbach, L. J. (1984). Essentials of psychological testing (3rd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
9. Cronbach, L. J., & Gleser, G. C. (1972). The dependability of behavior measures: Theory of generalizability for scores and profiles. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
10. Cronbach, L. J., Nanda, H., & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measures. New York: John Wiley.
11. Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
12. Deno, S. L. (2003). Developments in curriculum-based measurement. Journal of Special Education, 37, 184-192.
13. Fuchs, L. S., & Deno, S. L. (1991). Paradigmatic distinctions between instructionally relevant measurement models. Exceptional Children, 57, 488-500.
14. Good, R. H., & Jefferson, G. (1998). Contemporary perspectives on curriculum-based measurement validity. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Advanced applications of curriculum based measurement (pp. 61-88). New York: Guilford Press.
15. Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric methods (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
16. Hintze, J. M., Christ, T. J., & Keller, L. A. (2002). The generalizability of CBM survey-level mathematics assessments: Just how many samples do we need? School Psychology Review, 31, 514-528.
17. Hintze, J. M., Owen, S. V., Shapiro, E. S., & Daly, E. J. (2000). Generalizability of oral reading fluency measures: Application of G theory to curriculum-based measurement. School Psychology Quarterly, 15, 52-68.
18. Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.
19. Marston, D. B. (1989). A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 18-78). New York: Guildford Press.
20. Shapiro, E. S. (1996). Academic skills problems: Direct assessment and intervention (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
21. Shavelson, R. J., & Webb, N. M. (1991). Generalizability theory: A primer. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
22. Shinn, M. R. (2002). Best practices in using curriculum-based measurement in a problem-solving model. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (pp. 671-698). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
23. Shinn, M. R. (Ed.). (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: Guild-ford Press.
24. Shinn, M. R. (Ed.). (1998). Advanced applications of curriculum based measurement. New York: Guilford Press.
25. Shinn, M. R., Bamonto, S., Cornachione, C., Parker, C., Peterson, K., Thurber, R., et al. (1997). Curriculum-based measurement and problem-solving assessment: Training modules. University of Oregon.
26. Stage, S. A., & Jacobsen, M. D. (2001). Predicting student success on a state-mandated performance-based assessment using oral reading fluency. School Psychology Review, 30, 407-419.
27. Thurber, R. S. (2000). Construct validity of curriculum-based mathematics measures. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 61, 87.
28. Thurber, R. S., Shinn, M. R., & Smolkowski, K. (2002). What is measured in mathematics tests? Construct validity of curriculum-based mathematics measures. School Psychology Review, 31, 498-513.