Is ACCTRAN better than DELTRAN?

Cladistics

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1032-1038

  Agnarsson, Ingi ^a,b   Miller, Jeremy A ^c  

^a ANTON MELIK GEOGRAPHICAL INSTITUTE   (Slovenia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AKRON   (United States)

^c CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ANCESTRY; ASYMMETRY; HOMOLOGY; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENETICS; RECONSTRUCTION;

EID: 56649089778     PISSN: 07483007     EISSN: 10960031     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2008.00229.x     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Agnarsson, I., 2004. Morphological phylogeny of cobweb spiders and their relatives (Araneae, Araneoidea, Theridiidae). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 141, 447 626.
2. Agnarsson, I., 2006. A revision of the New World eximius lineage of Anelosimus (Araneae, Theridiidae) and a phylogenetic analysis using worldwide exemplars. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 146, 453 593.
3. Agnarsson, I., Coddington, J.A., 2008. Quantitative tests of primary homology. Cladistics 24, 51 61.
4. Agnarsson, I., Coddington, J.A., Knoflach, B., 2007. Morphology and evolution of cobweb spider male genitalia (Araneae: Theridiidae). J. Arachnol. 35, 334 395.
5. Benjamin, S.P., 2004. Taxonomic revision and phylogenetic hypothesis for the jumping spider subfamily Ballinae (Araneae, Salticidae). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 142, 1 82.
6. Britto, M.R., 2003. Phylogeny of the subfamily Corydoradinae Hoedeman, 1952 (Siluriformes: Callichthyidae), with a definition of its genera. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 153, 119 154.
7. Cunningham, C.W., 1999. Some limitations of ancestral character-state reconstructions when testing evolutionary hypotheses. Syst. Biol. 48, 665 674.
8. Cunningham, C.W., Omland, K.E., Oakley, T.H., 1998. Reconstructing ancestral character states: a critical reappraisal. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 361 366.
9. De Pinna, M.C.C., 1991. Concepts and tests of homology in the cladistic paradigm. Cladistics 7, 367 394.
10. Farris, J.S., 1970. Methods for computing Wagner trees. Syst. Zool. 19, 83 92.
11. Forest, L., Savolainen, V., Chase, M.W., Lupia, R., Bruneau, A., Cranes, P.R., 2005. Teasing apart molecular- versus fossil-based error estimates when dating phylogenetic trees: a case study in the birch family (Betulaceae). Syst. Bot. 30, 118 133.
12. Gaubert, P., Wozencraft, W.C., Cordeiro-Estrela, P., Veron, G., 2005. Mosaics of convergences and noise in morphological phylogenies: what's in a viverrid-like carnivoran? Syst. Biol. 54, 865 894.
13. Goloboff, P., 1997. Self-weighted optimization: tree searches and character state reconstructions under implied transformation costs. Cladistics 13, 225 246.
14. Gregorin, R., Ditchfield, A.D., 2005. New genus and species of nectar-feeding bat in the tribe Lonchophyllini (Phyllostomidae: Glossophaginae) from northeastern Brazil. J. Mammal. 86, 403 414.
15. Griswold, C.E., Coddington, J.A., Hormiga, G., Scharff, N., 1998. Phylogeny of the orb-web building spiders (Araneae, Orbiculariae: Deinopoidea, Araneoidea). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 123, 1 99.
16. Hilton, E.J., 2003. Comparative osteology and phylogenetic systematics of fossil and living bony-tongue fishes (Actinopterygii, Teleostei, Osteoglossomorpha). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 137, 1 100.
17. Hormiga, G., 1994. Cladistics and the comparative morphology of linyphiid spiders and their relatives (Araneae, Aranoidea, Linyphiidae). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 111, 1 71.
18. Hormiga, G., 2003. Weintrauboa, a new genus of pimoid spiders from Japan and adjacent islands, with comments on the monophyly and diagnosis of the family Pimoidae and the genus Pimoa (Araneoidea, Araneae). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 139, 261 281.
19. Kearney, M., Rieppel, O., 2006. Rejecting "the given" in systematics. Cladistics 22, 369 377.
20. Kitching, R.L., Forey, P.L., Humphries, C.J., Williams, D.M., 1998. Cladistics: The Theory and Practice of Parsimony Analysis, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
21. Maddison, D.R., 1994. Phylogenetic methods for inferring the evolutionary history and processes of change in discretely valued characters. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 39, 267 292.
22. Maddison, D.R., Maddison, W.P. 2001. MacClade 4.04: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
23. Maddison, W.P., Maddison, D.R. 1992. MacClade version 3: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
24. Maddison, W.P., Maddison, D.R., 2002. MacClade: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution, Version 4.01. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
25. Martel, E., Poncet, V., Lamy, F., Siljak-Yakovlev, S., Lejeune, B., Sarr, A., 2004. Chromosome evolution of Pennisetum species (Poaceae): implications of ITS phylogeny. Plant. Syst. Evol. 249, 139 149.
26. Miller, J.A., Hormiga, G., 2004. Clade stability and the addition of data: a case study from erigonine spiders (Araneae: Linyphiidae, Erigoninae). Cladistics 20, 385 442.
27. Minaka, N., 1993. Algebraic properties of the most parsimonious reconstructions of the hypothetical ancestors on a given tree. Forma 8, 277 296.
28. Miyakawa, K., Narushima, H., 2004. Lattice-theoretic properties of MPR-posets in phylogeny. Discrete Appl. Math. 134, 169 192.
29. Mooers, A.Ø., Schluter, D., 1999. Reconstructing ancestor states with maximum likelihood: support for one- and two-rate models. Syst. Biol. 48, 623 633.
30. Mooring, M.S., Blumstein, D.T., Stoner, C.J., 2004. The evolution of parasite-defence grooming in ungulates. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 81, 17 37.
31. Narushima, H., Misheva, N., 2002. On characteristics of ancestral character-state reconstructions under the accelerated transformation optimization. Discrete Appl. Math. 122, 195 209.
32. Nelson, G.J., Platnick, N.I., 1981. Systematics and Biogeography: Cladistics and Vicariance. Columbia University Press, New York.
33. Oakley, T.H., Cunningham, C.W., 2002. Molecular phylogenetic evidence for the independent evolutionary origin of an arthropod compound eye. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 1426 1430.
34. Omland, K.E., 1999. The assumptions and challenges of ancestral state reconstructions. Syst. Biol. 48, 604 611.
35. Patterson, C. 1982. Morphological characters and homology. In : Joysey, K.A., Friday, A.E. Eds Problems of Phylogenetic Reconstruction, Academic Press, London, pp. 21 74.
36. Prendini, L., Weygoldt, P., Wheeler, W.C., 2005. Systematics of the Damon variegatus group of African whip spiders (Chelicerata: Amblypygi): evidence from behaviour, morphology and DNA. Org. Divers Evol. 5, 203 236.
37. Ree, R.H., Donoghue, M.J., 1999. Inferring rates of change in flower symmetry in asterid angiosperms. Syst. Biol. 48, 633 641.
38. Richter, S., 2005. Homologies in phylogenetic anlayses - concept and tests. Theory Biosci. 124, 105 120.
39. Rieppel, O., Kearney, M., 2002. Similarity Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 75, 59 82.
40. Sankoff, D., Rousseau, P., 1975. Locating the vertices of a Steiner tree in an arbitrary space. Math. Program. 9, 240 246.
41. Scholtz, G., 2005. Homology and ontogeny: pattern and process in comparative developmental biology. Theory Biosci. 124, 121 143.
42. Schuh, R.T., 2000. Biological Systematics: Principles and Applications. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
43. Schultz, T.R., Churchill, G.A., 1999. The role of subjectivity in reconstructing ancestral character states: a Bayesian approach to unknown rates, states, and transformation asymmetries. Syst. Biol. 48, 651 664.
44. Shelley, E.L., Blumstein, D.T., 2005. The evolution of vocal alarm communication in rodents. Behav. Ecol. 16, 169 177.
45. Swofford, D.L., Maddison, W.P., 1987. Reconstructing ancestral character states under Wagner parsimony. Math. Biosci. 87, 199 229.
46. Swofford, D.L., Maddison, W.P. 1992. Parsimony, character-state reconstructions, and evolutionary inferences. In : Mayden, R.L. Ed Systematics, Historical Ecology, and North American Freshwater Fishes. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, pp. 187 223.
47. Trueman, J.W.H., Pfeil, B.E., Kelchner, S.A., Yeates, D.K., 2004. Did stick insects really regain their wings? Syst. Entomol. 29, 138 139.
48. Whiting, M.F., Whiting, A.S., 2004. Is wing recurrence really impossible?: a reply to Trueman et al. Syst. Entomol. 29, 140 141.
49. Whiting, M.F., Bradler, S., Maxwell, T., 2003. Loss and recovery of wings in stick insects. Nature 421, 264 267.
50. Wiens, J.J., 2001. Character analysis in morphological phylogenetics: problems and solutions. Syst. Biol. 50, 689 699.
51. Zanata, A.M., Vari, R.P., 2005. The family Alestidae (Ostariophysi, Characiformes): a phylogenetic analysis of a trans-Atlantic clade. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 145, 1 144.