Determining the cause of hearing loss: Differential diagnosis using a comparison of audiometric and otoacoustic emission responses

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 508-525

  Mills, David M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FUROSEMIDE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; GERBIL; HEARING LOSS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NONHUMAN; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; VESTIBULOCOCHLEAR NERVE DISEASE;

ANIMALS; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; GERBILLINAE; HEARING LOSS; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STRIA VASCULARIS;

EID: 33748529308     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.aud.0000233885.02706.ad     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Arts, H. A., Norton, S. J., & Rubel, E. W. (1999). The effect of perilymphatic tetrodotoxin on peripheral auditory system function. Seminars in Hearing, 20, 3-12.
2. Ashmore, J. F. (1987). A fast motile response in guinea-pig outer hair cells: the cellular basis of the cochlear amplifier. Journal of Physiology (London), 388, 323-347.
3. Bhatt, K. A., Liberman, M. C., & Nadol, J. B. (2001). Morphometric analysis of age-related changes in the human basilar membrane. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, 110, 1147-1153.
4. Brownell, W. E., Bader, C. R., Bertrand, D., & de Ribaupierre, Y. (1985). Evoked mechanical responses of isolated cochlear outer hair cells. Science, 227, 194-196.
5. Dallos, P. (1992). The active cochlea. Journal of Neuroscience, 12, 4575-4585.
6. Davis, H. (1983). An active process in cochlear mechanics. Hearing Research, 9, 79-90.
7. Drexl, M., Faulstich, M., von Stebut, B., Radtke-Schuller, S., & Kossl, M. (2003). Distortion product otoacoustic emissions and auditory evoked potentials in the hedgehog tenrec, Echinops telfairi. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 4, 555-564.
8. Feeney, M. P., & Sanford, C. A. (2004). Age effects in the human middle ear: wideband acoustical measures. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 3546-3558.
9. Gorga, M. P., Neely, S. T., Bergman, B. M., Beauchaine, K. L., Kaminski, J. R., & Liu, Z. (1994). Toward understanding the limits of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96, 1494-1500.
10. Gorga, M. P., Neely, S. T., & Dorn, P. A. (1999). Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance for a priori and for multifrequency audiometric standards. Ear and Hearing, 20, 345-362.
11. Gorga, M. P., Neely, S. T., Dorn, P. A., & Hoover, B. M. (2003). Further efforts to predict pure-tone thresholds from distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113, 3275-3284.
12. Hellstrom, L. I., & Schmiedt, R. A. (1990). Compound action potential input/output functions in young and quiet-aged gerbils. Hearing Research, 50, 163-174.
13. Kemp, D. T. (1978). Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64, 1386-1391.
14. Kujawa, S. G., & Liberman, M. C. (2001). Effects of olivocochlear feedback on distortion product otoacoustic emissions in guinea pig. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2, 268-278.
15. Mills, D. M. (1997). Interpretation of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements, I: two stimulus tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 413-429.
16. Mills, D. M. (2003). Differential responses to acoustic damage and furosemide in auditory brainstem and otoacoustic emission measures. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113, 914-924.
17. Mills, D. M., Norton, S. J., & Rubel, E. W. (1993). Vulnerability and adaptation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions to endocochlear potential variation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94, 2108-2122.
18. Mills, D. M., & Rubel, E. W. (1994). Variation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions with furosemide injection. Hearing Research, 77:183-199.
19. Mills, D. M., & Schmiedt, R. A. (2004). Metabolic presbycusis: differential changes in auditory brainstem and otoacoustic emission responses with chronic furosemide application in the gerbil. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 5, 1-10.
20. Mills, D. M., & Shepherd, R. K. (2001). Distortion product otoacoustic emission and auditory brainstem responses in the echidna (Tachyglossus aculeatus). Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2, 130-146.
21. Mills, J. H., Schmiedt, R. A., & Kulish, L. F. (1990). Age-related changes in auditory potentials of Mongolian gerbil. Hearing Research, 46, 201-210.
22. Moscicki, E. K., Elkins, E. F., Baum, H. M., & McNamera, P. M. (1985). Hearing loss in the elderly: an epidemiologic study of the Framingham Heart Study Cohort. Ear and Hearing, 6, 184-190.
23. Muller, J., & Janssen, T. (2004). Similarity in loudness and distortion product otoacoustic emission input-output functions: implications for an objective hearing aid adjustment. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115, 3081-3091.
24. Nelson, E. G., & Hinojosa, R. (2003). Presbycusis: a human temporal bone study of individuals with flat audiometric patterns of hearing loss using a new method to quantify stria vascularis volume. Laryngoscope, 113, 1672-1686.
25. Norton, S. J., Gorga, M. P., Widen, J. E., Folsom, R. C., Sininger, Y., Cone-Wesson, B., Vohr, B. R., Mascher, K., & Fletcher, K. (2000). Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: evaluation of transient evoked otoacoustic emission, distortion product otoacoustic emission, and auditory brain stem response test performance. Ear and Hearing, 21, 508-528.
26. Nuttall, A. L., & Dolan, D. F. (1996). Steady-state sinusoidal velocity responses of the basilar membrane in guinea pig. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 1556-1565.
27. Parker, M. A., & Cotanche, D. A. (2004). The potential use of stem cells for cochlear repair. Audiology and Neuro-Otology, 9, 72-80.
28. Pauler, M., Schuknecht, H. F., & White, J. A. (1988). Atrophy of the stria vascularis as a cause of sensorineural hearing loss. Laryngoscope, 98, 754-759.
29. Pickles, J. O. (1988). An Introduction to the Physiology of Hearing. San Diego: Academic Press.
30. Probst, R., Lonsbury-Martin, B. L., & Martin, G. K. (1991). A review of otoacoustic emissions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 2027-2067.
31. Puel, J.-L., Ruel, J., d'Aldin, C. G., & Pujol, R. (1998). Excitotoxicity and repair of cochlear synapses after noise-trauma induced hearing loss. Neuroreport, 9, 2109-2114.
32. Rubsamen, R., Mills, D. M., & Rubel, E. W. (1995). Effects of furosemide on distortion product otoacoustic emissions and on neuronal responses in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus. Journal of Neurophysiology, 74, 1628-1638.
33. Ruggero, M. A., & Rich, N. C. (1991). Furosemide alters organ of Corti mechanics: evidence for feedback of outer hair cells upon the basilar membrane. J. Neuroscience, 11, 1057-1067.
34. Ruggero, M. A., Rich, N. C., Recio, A., Narayan, S. S., & Robles, L. (1997). Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 2151-2163.
35. Ryan, A. (1976). Hearing sensitivity of the mongolian gerbil, Meriones unguiculatis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 59, 1222-1226.
36. Schmiedt, R. A. (1996). Effects of aging on potassium homeostasis and the endocochlear potential in the gerbil cochlea. Hearing Research, 102, 125-132.
37. Schmiedt, R. A., & Schulte, B. A. (1992). Physiologic and histopathologic changes in quiet- and noise-aged gerbil cochleas. In: Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. Dancer, A. L., Henderson, D., Salvi, R. J., & Hamernik, R. P., Eds. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book; pp. 246-256.
38. Schuknecht, H. F. (1964). Further observations on the pathology of presbycusis. Archives of Otolaryngology, 80, 369-382.
39. Schuknecht, H. F. (1974) Pathology of the Ear, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
40. Schuknecht, H. F. (1994). Auditory and cytocochlear correlates of inner ear disorders. Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, 110, 530-538.
41. Schuknecht, H. F., & Gacek, M. R. (1993). Cochlear pathology in presbycusis. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, 102(suppl 158), 1-16.
42. Sellick, P. M., & Russell, I. J. (1980). The responses of inner hair cells to basilar membrane velocity during low frequency auditory stimulation in the guinea pig cochlea. Hearing Research, 2, 439-445.
43. Sewell, W. F. (1984a). The effects of furosemide on the endocochlear potential and auditory-nerve fiber tuning curves in cats. Hearing Research, 14, 305-314.
44. Sewell, W. F. (1984b). Furosemide selectively reduces one component in rate-level functions from auditory-nerve fibers. Hearing Research, 15, 69-72.
45. Sewell, W. F. (1984c). The relation between the endocochlear potential and spontaneous activity in auditory nerve fibres of the cat. Journal of Physiology (London), 347, 685-696.
46. Shera, C. A., & Guinan, J. J. (1999). Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 782-798.
47. Starr, A., Picton, T. W., Sininger, Y., Hood, L. J., & Berlin, C. I. (1996). Auditory neuropathy. Brain, 119, 741-753.
48. Stover, L., Gorga, M. P., & Neely, S. T. (1996). Toward optimizing the clinical utility of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 956-967.
49. Talmadge, C. L., Long, G. R., Tubis, A., & Dhar, S. (1999). Experimental confirmation of the two-source interference model for the fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 275-292.
50. Trautwein, P., Hofstetter, P., Wang, J., Salvi, R., & Nostrant, A. (1996). Selective inner hair cell loss does not alter distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Hearing Research, 96, 71-82.
51. Walsh, E. J., McGee, J., McFadden, S. L., & Liberman, M. C. (1998). Long-term effects of sectioning the olivocochlear bundle in neonatal cats. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 3859-3869.
52. Wang, Y., Hirose, K., & Liberman, M. C. (2002). Dynamics of noise-induced cellular injury and repair in the mouse cochlea. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 3, 248-268.