Reductions of greenhouse gas emissions in Annex I and non-Annex I countries for meeting concentration stabilisation targets: An editorial comment

Climatic Change

Volumn 91, Issue 3-4, 2008, Pages 249-274

  Den Elzen, Michel ^a   Höhne, Niklas ^b  

^a PBL NETHERLANDS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AGENCY   (Netherlands)

^b Ecofys Germany GmbH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE FUELS; CLIMATOLOGY; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; EMISSION CONTROL; FORESTRY; GAS EMISSIONS; GASES; GLOBAL WARMING; GREENHOUSE GASES; GREENHOUSES; LAND USE; LEAKAGE (FLUID); METAL DRAWING;

BACKGROUND INFORMATIONS; BASE-LINES; CLIMATE POLICIES; CLIMATIC CHANGES; EMISSION REDUCTIONS; GLOBAL EMISSIONS; GREENHOUSE GAS CONCENTRATIONS; GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS; IN LINES; LOW CONCENTRATIONS; STABILISATION; WORKING GROUPS;

CARBON MONOXIDE;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE CHANGE; DEVELOPING WORLD; EMISSION CONTROL; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GREENHOUSE GAS; LAND USE CHANGE;

CARBON MONOXIDE; CONCENTRATION; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; FORESTRY; GAS; GREENHOUSE GASES; GREENHOUSES; LAND USE; LEAKAGE; METAL DRAWING; METEOROLOGY;

EID: 56549105431     PISSN: 01650009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-008-9484-z     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. Baer P, Athanasiou T, Kartha S (2008) The right to development in a climate constrained world: the greenhouse development rights framework, 2nd edn, May 2008. Heinrich Böll Foundation, Berlin, Germany. www.ecoequity.org/ docs/TheGDRsFramework.pdf
2. Baumert KA, Bhandari R, Kete N (1999) What might a developing country climate commitment look like? World Resources Institute, Washington
3. MM Berk MGJ den Elzen 2001 Options for differentiation of future commitments in climate policy: how to realise timely participation to meet stringent climate goals? Clim Pol 1 4 465 480
4. Blanchard O (2002) Scenarios for differentiating commitments. In: Baumert KA, Blanchard O, Llose, Perkaus JF (eds) Options for protecting the climate. WRI, Washington, pp 203-222
5. C Böhringer A Löschel 2005 Climate policy beyond Kyoto: Quo Vadis? A computable general equilibrium analysis based on expert judgments KYKLOS 58 4 467 493
6. C Böhringer H Welsch 2006 Burden sharing in a greenhouse: egalitarianism and sovereignty reconciled Appl Econ 38 981 996
7. Bollen JC, Manders AJG, Veenendaal PJJ (2004) How much does a 30% emission reduction cost? Macroeconomic effects of post-Kyoto climate policy in 2020. CPB Document no 64, Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, The Hague
8. BP: (2007). Statistical review of World Energy 2007. British Petroleum. http://www.bp.com/productlanding.do?categoryId=6848&contentId=7033471
9. Criqui P, Kitous A, Berk MM, et al (2003) Greenhouse gas reduction pathways in the UNFCCC Process up to 2025-Technical Report. B4-3040/2001/325703/ MAR/E.1 for the DG Environment, CNRS-IEPE, Grenoble, France
10. MGJ den Elzen 2002 Exploring climate regimes for differentiation of future commitments to stabilise greenhouse gas concentrations Integrated Assessment 3 4 343 359
11. MGJ den Elzen P Lucas 2005 The FAIR model: a tool to analyse environmental and costs implications of climate regimes Environ Model Assess 10 2 115 134
12. MGJ den Elzen M Meinshausen 2006 Meeting the EU 2°C climate target: global and regional emission implications Clim Pol 6 5 545 564
13. den Elzen MGJ, Meinshausen M (2006b) Multi-gas emission pathways for meeting the EU 2°C climate target. In: Schellnhuber HJ, Cramer W, Nakicenovic N, Wigley T, Yohe G (eds) Avoiding dangerous climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 299-310
14. MGJ den Elzen JS Fuglestvedt N Höhne 2005 Analysing countries' contribution to climate change: scientific uncertainties and methodological choices Environ Sci Policy 8 6 614 636
15. MGJ den Elzen P Lucas DP van Vuuren 2005 Abatement costs of post-Kyoto climate regimes Energ Pol 33 16 2138 2151
16. MGJ den Elzen MM Berk P Lucas C Criqui A Kitous 2006 Multi-Stage: a rule-based evolution of future commitments under the Climate Change Convention International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 6 1 1 28
17. MGJ den Elzen N Höhne B Brouns H Winkler HE Ott 2007 Differentiation of countries' post-2012 mitigation commitments under the "South-North Dialogue" Proposal Environ Sci Policy 10 3 185 203
18. MGJ den Elzen M Meinshausen DP van Vuuren 2007 Multi-gas emission envelopes to meet greenhouse gas concentration targets: costs versus certainty of limiting temperature increase Glob Environ Change 17 2 260 280
19. MGJ den Elzen N Höhne S Moltmann 2008 The Triptych approach revisited: a staged sectoral approach for climate mitigation Energ Pol 36 3 1107 1124
20. den Elzen MGJ, Lucas P, van Vuuren DP (2008b) Regional abatement action and costs under allocation schemes for emission allowances for achieving low CO2-equivalent concentrations. Climate Change, in press. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1007/s10584-008-9466-1
21. DOE (2003) International Energy Outlook 2003. www.eia.doe.gov/. Department of Energy (DOE), Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC
22. Fisher BS, Nakicenovic N, Alfsen K et al (2007) Issues related to mitigation in the long term context. In: Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR, Dave R, Meyer LA (eds) Climate change 2007: mitigation. Contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
23. H Groenenberg K Blok JP van der Sluijs 2004 Global Triptych: a bottom-up approach for the differentiation of commitments under the Climate Convention Clim Pol 4 153 175
24. Gupta S, Tirpak DA, Burger N et al (2007) Policies, instruments and co-operative arrangements. In: Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR, Dave R, Meyer LA (eds) Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
25. Höhne N (2005) What is next after the Kyoto Protocol. Assessment of options for international climate policy post 2012. University of Utrecht, PhD thesis, Utrecht, the Netherlands
26. Höhne N, Galleguillos C, Blok K, Harnisch J, Phylipsen D (2003) Evolution of commitments under the UNFCCC: involving newly industrialized countries and developing countries. Research-report 20141255, UBA-FB 000412, ECOFYS Gmbh, Berlin, Germany
27. Höhne N, Phylipsen D, Ullrich S, Blok K (2005) Options for the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol, research report for the German Federal Environmental Agency. Climate Change 02/05, ISSN 1611-8855, ECOFYS Gmbh. Available at www.umweltbundesamt.de, Berlin, Germany
28. N Höhne MGJ den Elzen M Weiss 2006 Common but differentiated convergence (CDC), a new conceptual approach to long-term climate policy Clim Pol 6 2 181 199
29. Höhne N, Phylipsen D, Moltmann S (2007) Factors underpinning future action. Reporrt PECSDE061439, commissioned by Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), ECOFYS Gmbh. Available at: http://www.post-kyoto.com/ data/fufa2.pdf, Cologne, Germany
30. IEA (2004) World Energy Outlook 2004. International Energy Agency, Paris
31. IEA (2007) World Energy Outlook 2007. International Energy Agency, Paris
32. IEA (2008) CO2 emissions form fuel combustion-1971-2005, 2007 edn. International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris
33. IIASA (1998) IIASA/WEC Global Energy Perspectives, Available at: http://www.iiasa.ac.at/cgi-bin/ecs/book_dyn/bookcnt.pyAustria. Laxenburg
34. IMAGE-team (2001) The IMAGE 2.2 implementation of the SRES scenarios. A comprehensive analysis of emissions, climate change and impacts in the 21st century. CD-ROM publication 481508018, Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (MNP), Bilthoven, the Netherlands
35. IPCC (2001) Climate Change 2001.The science of climate change. IPCC Assessment Reports. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 1-18
36. Jacoby HD, Schmalensee R, Wing IS (1999) Toward a useful architecture for climate change negotiations. Report No 49, MIT, Cambridge, MA
37. M Leimbach 2003 Equity and carbon emissions trading: a model analysis Energ Pol 31 10 1033 1044
38. M Meinshausen WL Hare TML Wigley 2006 Multi-gas emission pathways to meet climate targets Climate Change 75 1-2 151 194
39. Meyer A (2000) Contraction & Convergence. The global solution to climate change. Schumacher Briefings, 5. Green Books, Bristol, UK
40. A Michaelowa S Butzengeiger M Jung 2005 Graduation and deepening: an ambitious post-2012 climate policy scenario International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 5 25 46
41. Nakicenovic N, Riahi K (2003) Model runs with MESSAGE in the Context of the Further Development of the Kyoto-Protocol, WBGU-German Advisory Council on Global Change. WBGU website, http://www.wbgu.de/. Berlin, Germany
42. Nakicenovic N, Alcamo J, Davis G et al (2000) Special report on emissions scenarios. IPCC Special Reports. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
43. Ott HE, Winkler H, Brouns B et al (2004) South-North dialogue on equity in the greenhouse. A proposal for an adequate and equitable global climate agreements. Eschborn, Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit, www.erc.uct.ac.za/recentpub.htm or www.south-north-dialogue.net
44. TA Persson C Azar K Lindgren 2006 Allocation of CO2 emission permits-economic incentives for emission reductions in developing countries Energ Pol 34 1889 1899
45. GJM Phylipsen JW Bode K Blok H Merkus B Metz 1998 A Triptych sectoral approach to burden differentiation; GHG emissions in the European bubble Energ Pol 26 12 929 943
46. Sheehan P (2008) Responsibility for past and future global warming: uncertainties in attributing anthropogenic climate change. Climatic Change. doi: 10.1007/s10584-008-9415-z
47. GR Timilsina 2008 Atmospheric stabilization of CO2 emissions: near-term reductions and absolute versus intensity-based targets Energ Pol 36 1927 1936
48. UNFCCC (1997) Paper no. 1: Brazil; Proposed Elements of a Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. UNFCCC/AGBM/1997/MISC.1/ Add.3 GE.97, Bonn
49. K Vaillancourt JP Waaub 2006 A decision aid tool for equity issues analysis in emission permit allocations Clim Pol 5 5 487 501
50. van Vuuren DP, Riahi K (2008) Do recent emission trends imply higher emissions for ever? Climatic Change. doi: 10.1007/s10584-008-9485-y
51. van Vuuren DP, den Elzen MGJ, Berk MM et al (2003) Regional costs and benefits of alternative post-Kyoto climate regimes. RIVM-report 728001025. www.mnp.nl/en, Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (MNP), Bilthoven, the Netherlands
52. van Vuuren DP, Eickhout B, Lucas PL, den Elzen MGJ (2006) Long-term multi-gas scenarios to stabilise radiative forcing. Energy Journal, Multi-Greenhouse Gas Mitigation and Climate Policy (Special Issue #3):201-234
53. DP van Vuuren MGJ den Elzen B Eickhout 2007 Stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations at low levels: an assessment of reduction strategies and costs Climatic Change 81 2 119 159
54. WBGU (2003) Climate protection strategies for the 21st century. Kyoto and beyond. German Advisory Council on Global Change, Berlin
55. H Winkler R Spalding-Fecher L Tyani 2002 Comparing developing countries under potential carbon allocation schemes Clim Pol 9 1 16