Equity and carbon emissions trading: A model analysis

Energy Policy

Volumn 31, Issue 10, 2003, Pages 1033-1044

  Leimbach, Marian ^a  

^a POTSDAM INSTITUTE FOR CLIMATE IMPACT RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Climate policy; Emissions trading; Equity; Integrated assessment

Indexed keywords

CARBON; COST EFFECTIVENESS; EVALUATION; INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS;

CLIMATE POLICY;

INDUSTRIAL EMISSIONS;

CARBON EMISSION; CLIMATE CHANGE; EMISSION CONTROL; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; EQUITY; MODELING;

EID: 0037411665     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00180-5     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aaheim, H.A., 1999. The appropriateness of economic approaches to the analysis of burden-sharing. In Toth, F.L. (Ed.), Fair Weather? Equity Concerns in Climate Change, Earthscan, London.
2. Azar, C., 1999. Weight factors in cost-benefit analysis of climate change. Environmental and Resource Economics 15, 249-267.
3. Böhringer, C., Welsch, H., 1999. 'C&C - contraction and convergence of carbon emissions: the economic implications of international emissions trading' ZEW discussion paper 99-13, Centre for European Economic Research, Mannheim.
4. Bosello, F., Roson, R., 2000. Distributional consequences of alternative emissions trading schemes. In Carraro C. (Ed.), Efficiency and Equity of Climate Change Policy, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht.
5. Bruckner, T., Petschel-Held, G., Toth, F.L., Füssel, M., Helm, C., Leimbach, M., Schellnhuber, H.J., 1999. Climate change decision-support and the tolerable windows approach. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 4, 217-234.
6. Bruckner, T., Hooss, G., Füssel, M., Hasselmann, K., 2003. Climate system modeling within the framework of the tolerable windows approach: the ICLIPS climate model. Climatic Change, in press.
7. Buonanno, P., Carraro, C., Castelnuovo, E., Galeotti, M., 2001. Emissions trading restrictions with endogenous technical change. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 1, 379-395.
8. Carraro, C., 2000. (Ed.), Efficiency and Equity of Climate Change Policy, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht.
9. Edmonds, J., Wise, M., Barns, D.W., 1995. Carbon coalitions: the cost and effectiveness of energy agreements to alter trajectories of atmospheric carbon dioxide emissions. Energy Policy 23, 309-335.
10. Gritsevskyi, A., Schrattenholzer, L., 2003. Costs of reducing carbon emissions: an integrated modeling framework approach. Climatic Change, in press.
11. 2 emissions. Energy Policy 27, 727-736.
12. Helm, C., 1999. Applying fairness criteria to the allocation of climate protection burdens: an economic perspective. In Toth, F.L. (Ed.), Fair Weather? Equity Concerns in Climate Change, Earthscan, London.
13. Leimbach, M., Toth, F.L., 2003. Economic development and emission control over the long term: the ICLIPS aggregated economic model. Climatic Change, in press.
14. Leggett, J., Pepper, W.J., Swart, R.J., 1992. Emission scenarios for the IPCC: an update. In Houghton, J.T. Callander, B.A. Varney, S.K. (Eds.), Climate Change 1992: the supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment, Cambridge University press, Cambridge.
15. Manne, A., Richels, R., 1995. The greenhouse debate: economic efficiency, burden sharing and hedging strategies. Energy Journal 16 (4), 1-37.
16. Manne, A., Rutherford, T., 1994. International trade, capital flows and sectoral analysis: formulation and solution of intertemporal equilibrium models. In Cooper, W.W. Whinston, A.B. (Eds.), New Directions in Computational Economics, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht.
17. Metz, B., 2000. International equity in climate change policy. Integrated Assessment 1, 111-126.
18. Meyer, A., 2000. Contraction & Convergence: the Global Solution to Climate Change, Schumacher Briefing No.5, Green Books Ltd., Foxhole.
19. Müller, B., 2001. Fair Compromise in a Morally Complex World, Paper presented at the Pew Center 'Equity and Global Climate Change' Conference, Washington, DC, 17-18 April 2001.
20. Nakicenovic, N., Swart, R., 2000. Emission Scenarios. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
21. Negishi, T., 1972. General Equilibrium Theory and International Trade. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
22. Nordhaus, W.D., Boyer, J., 2000. Warming the World. Economic Models of Global Warming. MIT Press, Cambridge.
23. Porter, M., van der Linde, C., 1995. Toward a new conception of the environmental-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives 4 (9), 97-118.
24. Rawls, J., 1971. A Theory of Social Justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
25. Ridgley, M.A., 1996. Fair sharing of greenhouse gas burdens. Energy Policy 24 (6), 517-529.
26. Ringius, L., Torvanger, A., Holtsmark, B., 1998. Can multi-criteria rules fairly distribute climate burdens? - OECD results from three burden sharing rules. Energy Policy 26 (10), 777-793.
27. 2 emissions. In Tietenberg, T. (Ed.), The Economics of Global Warming, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
28. Rose, A., Stevens, B., 2001. An economic analysis of flexible permit trading in the Kyoto protocol. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 1, 219-242.
29. Rose, A., Stevens, B., Edmonds, J., Wise, M., 1998. International equity and differentiation in global warming policy. Environmental and Resource Economics 12, 25-51.
30. Toth, F.L., Bruckner, T., Füssel, M., Leimbach, M., Petschel-Held, G., 2003. Integrated assessment of long-term climate policies: Part 1. Model presentation. Climatic Change, in press.
31. WBGU, 1995. Scenario for the derivation of global CO2 reduction targets and implementation strategies. German Advisory Council on Global Change, Bremerhaven.