Clinical value of computer-assisted analysis in MR mammography. A comparison between two systems and three observers with different levels of experience;Klinische wertigkeit computergestützter analysen in der MR-mammografie. Ein vergleich zwischen zwei systemen und drei untersuchern mit unterschiedlicher erfahrung

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 180, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 968-976

  Renz, Diane Miriam ^a   Baltzer, P A T ^a   Kullnig, P E ^a   Bottcher J ^a   Vag, T ^a   Gajda, M ^a   Camera, O ^a   Runnebaum, I B ^a   Kaiser, W A ^a  

^a FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

Breast; CAD; Computer assisted detection; MR imaging; MR mammography

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST LESION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; SCORING SYSTEM; BREAST DISEASE; BREAST TUMOR; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY;

BREAST DISEASES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 56149087953     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1027772     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Kuhl CK. Current status of breast MR imaging. Part 2. Clinical applications. Radiology 2007; 244: 672-691
2. Kaiser WA, Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations. Radiology 1989; 170: 681-686
3. Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 1295-1303
4. Winnekendonk G, Krug B, Warm M et al. Diagnostischer Stellenwert der präoperativen MR-Mammographie (MRM). Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 688-693
5. Preda L, Villa G, Rizzo S et al. Magnetic resonance mammography in the evaluation of recurrence at the prior lumpectomy site after conservative surgery and radiotherapy. Breast Cancer Res 2006; 8: R53
6. Kuhl CK. Familiäre Brustkrebserkrankung: klinische Grundlagen und Früherkennung. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2006; 178: 680-687
7. Obenauer S, Grabbe E, Knollmann F. Stellenwert der MR-gestützten Lokalisation und Biopsie von Brustläsionen. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2006; 178: 477-483
8. Schulz-Wendtland R, Wenkel E, Lell M et al. Experimental phantom lesion detectability study using a digital breast tomosynthesis prototype system. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2006; 178: 1219-1223
9. Fischer T, Filimonow S, Hamm B et al. Dignitätsbeurteilung mammasonographischer Herde mittels dreidimensionaler Darstellung. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2006; 178: 1224-1234
10. Kuhl CK, Schild HH, Morakkabati N. Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution. Radiology 2005; 236: 789-800
11. Gribbestad IS, Nilsen G, Fjøsne HE et al. Comparative signal intensity measurements in dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR mammography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1994; 4: 477-480
12. Holland AE, Hendrick RE, Jin H et al. Correlation of high-resolution breast MR imaging with histopathology, validation of a technique. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 11: 601-606
13. Kuhl CK, Bieling HB, Lutterbey G et al. Standardisierung und Beschleunigung der quantitativen Analyse dynamischer MR-Mammographien durch Parameterbilder und automatisierte ROI-Definition. Fortschr Röntgenstr 1996; 164: 475-482
14. Mussurakis S, Buckley DL, Coady AM et al. Observer variability in the interpretation of contrast enhanced MRI of the breast. Br J Radiol 1996; 69: 1009-1016
15. Mussurakis S, Buckley DL, Horsman A. Dynamic MRI of invasive breast cancer: assessment of three region-of-interest analysis methods. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997; 21: 431-438
16. Vornweg TW, Teifke A, Kauczor HU et al. Selbstorganisierende neuronale Netze zur automatischen Detektion und Klassifikation von Kontrast(mittel)-verstärkten Läsionen in der dynamischen MR-Mammographie. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2005; 177: 703-713
17. Degani H, Gusis V, Weinstein D et al. Mapping pathophysiological features of breast tumors by MRI at high spatial resolution. Nat Med 1997; 3: 780-782
18. Kelcz F, Furman-Haran E, Grobgeld D et al. Clinical testing of high-spatial-resolution parametric contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast. Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179: 1485-1492
19. Williams TC, DeMartini WB, Partridge SC et al. Breast MR imaging: computer-aided evaluation program for discriminating benign from malignant lesions. Radiology 2007; 244: 94-103
20. Hauth EAM, Jaeger H, Maderwald S et al. Evaluation of quantitative parametric analysis for characterization of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 2834-2841
21. Doi K. Computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging: historical review, current status and future potential. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2007; 31: 198-211
22. Malich A, Vogel D, Facius M et al. Evaluation der Primärbefundung durch ein CAD-System in der Mammadiagnostik. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2003; 175: 1225-1231
23. Rubin GD, Lyo JK, Paik DS et al. Pulmonary nodules on multi-detector row CT scans: performance comparison of radiologists and computer-aided detection. Radiology 2005; 234: 274-283
24. Schäfer ML, Pfeil A, Renz DM et al. Effects of long-term immobilisation on cortical bone mass after traumatic amputation of the phalanges estimated by digital X-ray radiogrammetry. Osteoporos Int 2008; 19: 1291-1299
25. Fischer U, Helbich T (eds). ACR BI-RADS. In: Fischer U, Helbich T (Hrsg). Deutsche Ausgabe des Breast imaging reporting and data system. Stuttgart: Thieme, 2006
26. Wiener JI, Schilling KJ, Adami C et al. Assessment of suspected breast cancer by MRI: a prospective clinical trial using a combined kinetic and morphologic analysis. Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184: 878-886
27. Szabó BK, Aspelin P, Wiberg MK et al. Dynamic MR imaging of the breast. Analysis of kinetic and morphologic diagnostic criteria. Acta Radiol 2003; 44: 379-386
28. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 1999; 211: 101-110
29. Baum F, Fischer U, Vosshenrich R et al. Classification of hypervascularized lesions in CE MR imaging of the breast. Eur Radiol 2002; 12: 1087-1092
30. Malich A, Fischer DR, Wurdinger S et al. Potential MRI interpretation model: differentiation of benign from malignant breast masses. Am J Roentgenol 2005; 185: 964-970
31. Renz DM, Baltzer PAT, Böttcher J et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of inflammatory breast carcinoma and acute mastitis. A comparative study. Eur Radiol 2008; [Epub ahead of print]
32. Buadu LD, Murakami J, Murayama S et al. Breast lesions: correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis. Radiology 1996; 200: 639-649
33. Sherif H, Mahfouz AE, Oellinger H et al. Peripheral washout sign on contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast. Radiology 1997; 205: 209-213
34. Pediconi F, Catalano C, Venditti F et al. Color-coded automated signal intensity curves for detection and characterization of breast lesions: preliminary evaluation of a new software package for integrated magnetic resonance-based breast imaging. Invest Radiol 2005; 40: 448-457
35. Lehman CD, Peacock S, DeMartini WB et al. A new automated software system to evaluate breast MR examinations: improved specificity without decreased sensitivity. Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187: 51-56
36. Teifke A, Vornweg TW, Hlawatsch A et al. Mammadiagnostische Zweitbefundung in der Radiologischen Klinik: sinnvoller Mehraufwand oder Ressourcenverschwendung? Fortschr Röntgenstr 2006; 178: 330-336
37. Balleyguier C, Kinkel K, Fermanian J et al. Computer-aided detection (CAD) in mammography: Does it help the junior or the senior radiologist? Eur J Radiol 2005; 54: 90-96
38. Thurfjell E, Thurfjell MG, Egge E et al. Sensitivity and specificity of computer-assisted breast cancer detection in mammography screening. Acta Radiol 1998; 39: 384-388
39. Malich A, Beier A, Bank P et al. Inwieweit verbessert der Einsatz eines CAD-Systems das Prüfungsergebnis bei der Beurteilung einer kassenärztlichen Mammographiefallsammlung? Fortschr Röntgenstr 2007; 179: 53-57
40. Gilhuijs KGA, Deurloo EE, Muller SH et al. Breast MR imaging in women at increased lifetime risk of breast cancer: clinical system for computerized assessment of breast lesions - initial results. Radiology 2002; 225: 907-916
41. Penn A, Thompson S, Brem R et al. Morphologic blooming in breast MRI as a characterization of margin for discriminating benign from malignant lesions. Acad Radiol 2006; 13: 1344-1354
42. Hukkinen K, Vehmas T, Pamilo M et al. Effect of computer-aided detection on mammographic performance: experimental study on readers with different levels of experience. Acta Radiol 2006; 3: 257-263