12-Month self-ligating bracket failure rate with a self-etching primer

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 78, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1095-1100

  Elekdag Turk, Selma ^a   Cakmak, Fethiye ^a   Isci, Devrim ^a   Turk, Tamer ^a  

^a ONDOKUZ MAYIS UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Bracket failure; Self etching primer; Self ligating brackets; Survival rate

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY; NICKEL; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; STAINLESS STEEL; TITANIUM; TITANIUM NICKELIDE; TRANSBOND PLUS SELF ETCHING PRIMER; TRANSBOND PLUS SELF-ETCHING PRIMER; TRANSBOND XT; TRANSBOND XT LIGHT CURE ADHESIVE PRIMER;

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CANINE TOOTH; CHEMISTRY; CHILD; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCISOR; MALE; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; PATHOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SEX DIFFERENCE; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURVIVAL; TOOTH ARCH;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADOLESCENT; BICUSPID; CHILD; COMPOSITE RESINS; CUSPID; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL ARCH; DENTAL BONDING, LIGHT-CURED; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCISOR; MALE; NICKEL; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; ORTHODONTIC WIRES; RESIN CEMENTS; SEX FACTORS; STAINLESS STEEL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TITANIUM;

EID: 56049123217     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/112507-552.1     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Cinader D. Chemical processes and performance comparisons of Transbond Plus self-etching primer. Orthod Perspect. 2001;7:8-9.
2. Cal-Neto JP, Miguel JA. Scanning electron microscopy evaluation of the bonding mechanism of a self-etching primer on enamel. Angle Orthod. 2006;76:132-136.
3. Hannig M, Bock H, Bott B, Hoth-Hannig W. Inter-crystallite nanoretention of self-etching adhesives at enamel imaged by transmission electron microscopy. Eur J Oral Sci. 2002;110:464-470.
4. Pashley DH, Tay FR. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives part II: etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Mater. 2001;17:430-444.
5. Grubisa HS, Heo G, Raboud D, Glover KE, Major PW. An evaluation and comparison of orthodontic bracket bond strengths achieved with self-etching primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;126:213-219.
6. Dorminey JC, Dunn WJ, Taloumis LJ. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with a modified 1-step etch-ant-and-primer technique. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124:410-413.
7. Turk T, Elekdag-Turk S, Isci D. Effects of self-etching primer on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets at different debond times. Angle Orthod. 2007;77:108-112.
8. Aljubouri YD, Millett DT, Gilmour WH. Six and 12 months' evaluation of a self-etching primer versus two-stage etch and prime for orthodontic bonding: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Orthod. 2004;26:565-571.
9. Asgari S, Salas A, English J, Powers J. Clinical evaluation of bond failure rates with a new self-etching primer. J Clin Orthod. 2002;36:687-689.
10. Ireland AJ, Knight H, Sherriff M. An in vivo investigation into bond failure rates with a new self-etching primer system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124:323-326.
11. Cal-Neto JP, Miguel JA. An in vivo evaluation of bond failure rates with hydrophilic and self-etching primer systems. J Clin Orthod. 2005;39:701-702.
12. dos Santos JE, Quioca J, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Six-month bracket survival with a self-etch adhesive. Angle Orthod. 2006;76:863-868.
13. Murfitt PG, Quick AN, Swain MV, Herbison GP. A randomised clinical trial to investigate bond failure rates using a self-etching primer. Eur J Orthod. 2006;28:444-449.
14. Årtun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod. 1984;85:333-340.
15. Hasegawa T, Retief DH, Russell CM, Denys FR. Shear bond strength and quantitative microleakage of a multipurpose dental adhesive system resin bonded to dentin. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;73:432-438.
16. House K, Ireland AJ, Sherriff M. An investigation into the use of a single component self-etching primer adhesive system for orthodontic bonding: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Orthod. 2006;33:38-44.
17. Pandis N, Eliades T. A comparative in vivo assessment of the long-term failure rate of 2 self-etching primers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;128:96-98.
18. Hitmi L, Muller C, Mujajic M, Attal JP. An 18-month clinical study of bond failures with resin-modified glass ionomer cement in orthodontic practice. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;120:406-415.
19. O'Brien KD, Read MJ, Sandison RJ, Roberts CT. A visible light-activated direct-bonding material: an in vivo comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;95:348-351.
20. Mavropoulos A, Karamouzos A, Kolokithas G, Athanasiou AE. In vivo evaluation of two new moisture-resistant orthodontic adhesive systems: a comparative clinical trial. J Orthod. 2003;30:139-147.
21. Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T. Failure rate of self-ligating and edgewise brackets bonded with conventional acid etching and a self-etching primer: a prospective in vivo study. Angle Orthod. 2006;76:119-122.
22. Hegarty DJ, Macfarlane TV. In vivo bracket retention comparison of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement and a resin-based bracket adhesive system after a year. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;121:496-501.