Scanning electron microscopy evaluation of the bonding mechanism of a self-etching primer on enamel

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 76, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 132-136

  Cal Neto, Julio P ^a   Miguel, José Augusto M ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Phosphoric acid etching; Scanning electron microscopy; Self etching primer

Indexed keywords

EID: 31144450061     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Buonocore MG. Simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surface. J Dent Res. 1955;34:849-853.
2. Milia E, Lallai MR. In vivo effect of a self-etching primer on dentin. Am J Dent. 1999;12:167-171.
3. Bishara SE, Von Wald L, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ. Effect of a self-etch primer/adhesive on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;119:621-624.
4. Yamada R, Hayakawa T, Kasai K. Effect of using self-etching primer for bonding orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod. 2002;72:558-564.
5. Chigira H, Koike T, Hasegawa T, Itoh K, Wakumoto S, Hyakawa T. Effect of the self etching dentin primers on bonding efficacy of dentine adhesive. Dent Mater J. 1989;8:86-92.
6. Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, De Angelis M, Scribante A, Klersy C. Effect of water and saliva contamination on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with conventional, hydrophilic, and self-etching primers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123:633-640.
7. Craig RG. Restorative Dental Materials. 10th ed. St Louis, Mo: Mosby Year Book; 1997:256.
8. Dorminey JC, Dunn WJ, Taloumis LJ. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with a modified 1-step etchant-and primer technique. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124:410-413.
9. Kanemura N, Sano H, Tagami J. Tensile bond strength to and SEM evaluation of ground and intact enamel surfaces. J Dent. 1999;27:523-530.
10. Osorio R, Toledano M, Garcia-Godoy F. Bracket bonding with 15- or 60-second etching and adhesive remaining on enamel after debonding. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:45-48.
11. Çehreli ZC, Altay N. Effects of a nonrinse conditioner and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on the etch pattern of intact human permanent enamel. Angle Orthod. 2000;70:22-27.
12. Barkmeier WW, Gwinnet AJ, Shaffer SE. Effects of enamel etching time on bond strength and morphology. J Clin Orthod. 1985;19:36-38.
13. Barkmeier WW, Gwinnet AJ, Shaffer SE. Effects of reduced acid concentration and etching time on bond strength and enamel morphology. J Clin Orthod. 1987;21:395-398.
14. Sadowsky PL, Retief DH, Cox PR, Hernandez-Ortiz R, Rape WG, Bradley EL. Effects of etchant concentration and duration on the retention of orthodontic brackets: an in vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;98:417-421.
15. Gordan VV, Vargas MA, Cobb DS. Evaluation of adhesive systems using acidic primers. Am J Dent. 1997;10:219-223.
16. Barkmeier WW, Shaffer SE, Gwinnet AJ. Effects of 15 or 60 second enamel acid conditioning on adhesion and morphology. Oper Dent. 1986;11:111-116.
17. Burrow W. The influence of age and depth of dentin on bonding. Dent Mater. 1994;10:241-246.
18. Arnold RW, Combe EC, Warford JH Jr. Bonding of stainless steel brackets to enamel with a new self-etching primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;122:274-276.
19. Cagidiaco MC, Ferrari M, Vichi C. Mapping of tubule and intertubule surface areas available for bonding in Class V and Class II preparations. J Dent. 1997;25:379-389.
20. Ferrari M, Manocci F, Kugel G. Standardized microscopic evaluation of the bonding mechanism of NRC/Prime & Bond NT. Am J Dent. 1999;12:77-83.