In vivo evaluation of two new moisture-resistant orthodontic adhesive systems: A comparative clinical trial

Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 139-147

  Mavropoulos, A ^a   Karamouzos, A ^a   Kolokithas, G ^a   Athanasiou, A E ^a  

^a ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

Author keywords

Clinical trial; Moistureresistant adhesive; Orthodontic bonding

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT; ALCOHOL; ASSURE CEMENT; COMPOMER; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RESIN CEMENT; SILICON DIOXIDE; STAINLESS STEEL; TRANSBOND MOISTURE INSENSITIVE PRIMER; TRANSBOND MOISTURE-INSENSITIVE PRIMER; UNITE;

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; MECHANICAL STRESS; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICAL MODEL; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURVIVAL; TIME; TOOTH;

ADHESIVES; ADOLESCENT; CHILD; COMPOMERS; DENTAL BONDING; ETHANOL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; METHACRYLATES; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; RESIN CEMENTS; SILICON DIOXIDE; STAINLESS STEEL; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS; TOOTH;

EID: 0142093616     PISSN: 14653125     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ortho/30.2.139     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bishara SE, Khowassah MA, Oesteerle LJ. Effect of humidity and temperature changes on orthodontic bonding adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1975;54:751-8.
2. Zachrisson BU. A post-treatment evaluation of direct bonding in orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1977;71:173-89.
3. Newman GV. A post-treatment survey of direct bonding of metal brackets. Am J Orthod 1978;74:197-206.
4. Mizrahi E. Success and failure of banding and bonding. A clinical study. Angle Orthod 1982;52:113-17.
5. Trimpeneers LM, Dermaut LR. A clinical trial comparing the failure rates of two orthodontic bonding systems. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1996;110:547-50.
6. Grandhi RK, Combe EC, Speidel TM. Shear bond strength of stainless steel orthodontic brackets with a moistureinsensitive primer. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2001;119:251-5. (Pubitemid 33601197)
7. Ewoldsen N, Demke RS. A review of orthodontic cements and adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2001;120:45-8. (Pubitemid 33628930)
8. Hobson RS, Ledvinka J, Meechan JG. The effect of moisture and blood contamination on bond strength of a new orthodontic bonding material. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2001;120:54-7. (Pubitemid 33628932)
9. Webster MJ, Nanda RS, Duncanson MG, Khajotia SS, Sinha PK. The effect of saliva on shear bond strengths of hydrophilic bonding systems. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2001;119:54-8. (Pubitemid 33608767)
10. Eliades T, Katsavrias E, Eliades G. Moisture-insensitive adhesives: reactivity with water and bond strength to wet and saliva-contaminated enamel. Eur J Orthod 2002;24:35-42.
11. Rix D, Foley TF, Mamandras A. Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives: composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2001;119:36-42. (Pubitemid 33608765)
12. Littlewood SJ, Mitchell L, Greenwood DC, Bubb NL, Wood DJ. Investigation of a hydrophilic primer for orthodontic bonding: an in vitro study. J Orthod 2000;27:181-6.
13. Eliades T, Brantley WA. The inappropriateness of conventional orthodontic bond strength assessment protocols. Eur J Orthod 2000;22:13-23.
14. Årtun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod 1984;85:333-40.
15. Karamouzos A, Mavropoulos A, Athanasiou AE, Kolokithas G. In vivo evaluation of a moisture-active orthodontic adhesive: a comparative clinical trial. Orthod Craniofac Res 2002;5:170-8.
16. Brantley WA, Eliades T. Orthodontic Materials: scientific and clinical aspects. Stuttgart: Thieme, 2001.
17. Littlewood SJ, Mitchell L, Greenwood DC. A randomized controlled trial to investigate brackets bonded with a hydrophilic primer. J Orthod 2001;28:301-5.
18. Verbeeck RMH, De Maeyer EAP, Marks LAM, De Moor RJG, De Witte AMJC, Trimpeneers LM. Fluoride release process of (resin-modified) glass-ionomer cements versus (polyacid-modified) composite resins. Biomaterials 1998;19:509-19. (Pubitemid 28246071)
19. Cacciafesta V, Bosch C, Melsen B. Clinical comparison between a resin-reinforced self-cured glass ionomer cement and a composite resin for direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Part I: Wetting with water. Clin Orthod Res 1998;1:29-36.
20. O'Brien KD, Read MJ, Sandison RJ, Roberts CT. A visible light-activated direct-bonding material: an in vivo comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1989;95:348-51.
21. Sunna S, Rock WP. Clinical performance of orthodontic brackets and adhesive systems: a randomized clinical trial. Br J Orthod 1998;25:283-7.
22. Shammaa I, Ngan P, Kim H, Kao E, Gladwin M, Gunel E, Brown C. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study. Angle Orthod 1999;69:463-9.
23. Cacciafesta V, Bosch C, Melsen B. Clinical comparison between a resin-reinforced self-cured glass ionomer cement and a composite resin for direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Part 2: bonding on dry enamel and on enamel soaked with saliva. Clin Orthod Res 1999;2:186-93.
24. Chung CH, Piatti A. Clinical comparison of the bond failure rates between fluoride-releasing and non-fluoride-releasing composite resins. J Clin Orthod 2000;34:409-12.
25. Lovius BBJ, Pender N, Hewage S, O'Dowling I, Tomkins A. A clinical trial of a light activated material over an 18-month period. Br J Orthod 1987;14:11-20.
26. Wiltshire WA. Shear bond strength of a glass ionomer for direct bonding in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994;106:127-30.
27. Trimpeneers LM, Dermaut LR. A clinical trial comparing the failure rates of two orthodontic bonding systems. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1996;110:547-50.
28. Carstensen W. Clinical results after direct bonding of brackets using shorter etching times. Am J Orthod 1986;89:70-2.
29. Kinch AP, Taylor H, Warltier R, Oliver RG, Newcombe RG. A clinical trial comparing the failure rates of directly bonded brackets using etch times of 15 or 60 seconds. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988;94:476-83.
30. Read MJ, O'Brien KD. A clinical trial of an indirect bonding technique with a visible light-cured adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990;98:259-62.
31. Millett DT, Hallgren A, Cattanach D, McFadzean R, Pattison J, Robertson M, Love J. A 5-year clinical review of bond failure with a light-cured resin adhesive. Angle Orthod 1998;68:351-6. (Pubitemid 128543202)
32. Armas Galindo HR, Sadowsky PL, Vlachos C, Jacobson A, Wallace D. An in vivo comparison between a visible lightcured bonding system and a chemically cured bonding system. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1998;113:271-5.
33. Underwood ML, Rawls HR, Zimmerman BF. Clinical evaluation of a fluoride-exchanging resin as an orthodontic adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1989;96:93-9.
34. Gorelick L, Geiger AM, Gwinnett AJ. Implications of the failure rates of bonded brackets and eyelets: a clinical study. Am J Orthod 1984;86:403-6.
35. Whittaker DK. Structural variations in the surface zone of human tooth enamel observed by scanning electron microscopy. Arch Oral Biol 1982;27:383-92. (Pubitemid 12076227)
36. White L. Toothbrush pressures of orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod 1983;83:109-13.
37. Hitmi L, Muller C, Mujajic M, Attal JP. An 18-month clinical study of bond failures with resin-modified glass ionomer cement in orthodontic practice. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2001;120:406-15. (Pubitemid 33601795)
38. Millet DT, Gordon PH. A 5-year clinical review of bond failure with a no-mix adhesive (Right on). Eur J Orthod 1994;16:203-11.