Cervical spine biomechanics following implantation of a disc prosthesis

Medical Engineering and Physics

Volumn 30, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 1127-1133

  Galbusera, Fabio ^a   Bellini, Chiara M ^a   Raimondi, Manuela T ^a,b   Fornari, Maurizio ^a   Assietti, Roberto ^c  

^a IRCCS ISTITUTO ORTOPEDICO GALEAZZI   (Italy)

^b POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

^c FATEBENEFRATELLI HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

Artificial disc; Cervical arthroplasty; Cervical disc prosthesis; Finite element

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); MECHANICS; PROSTHETICS;

ANNULUS FIBROSUS; ARTIFICIAL DISC; CERVICAL ARTHROPLASTY; CERVICAL DISC PROSTHESIS; CERVICAL SPINES; DETAILED MODELS; DISC ARTHROPLASTY; FACET JOINTS; FINITE ELEMENT; FINITE ELEMENT MODELS; IMPLANT INTERFACES; MECHANICAL ASPECTS; MECHANICAL BEHAVIOURS; MICRO MOTIONS; NONLINEAR FINITE ELEMENTS; PHYSIOLOGICAL MOTIONS; POSTE-RIORS; SEGMENTAL MOTIONS; SINGLE LEVELS; TOTAL DISC ARTHROPLASTY;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; BODY MOVEMENT; CERVICAL SPINE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FORCE; IMPLANT; IMPLANTATION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; KINEMATICS; LIGAMENT; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTIC MODULUS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TORQUE;

EID: 55949123013     PISSN: 13504533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Mummaneni P.V., and Haid R.W. The future in the care of the cervical spine: interbody fusion and arthroplasty. J Neurosurg Spine 1 2 (2004) 155-159
2. Hilibrand A.S., and Robbins M. Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion?. Spine J 4 6 Suppl (2004) 190S-194S Review
3. Goffin J., Van Calenbergh F., van Loon J., Casey A., Kehr P., Liebig K., et al. Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis: single-level and bi-level. Spine 28 24 (2003) 2673-2678
4. Duggal N., Pickett G.E., Mitsis D.K., and Keller J.L. Early clinical and biomechanical results following cervical arthroplasty. Neurosurg Focus 17 3 (2004) E9 Review
5. Coric D., Finger F., and Boltes P. Prospective randomized controlled study of the Bryan cervical disc: early clinical results from a single investigational site. J Neurosurg Spine 4 1 (2006) 31-35
6. Puttlitz C.M., and DiAngelo D.J. Cervical spine arthroplasty biomechanics. Neurosurg Clin N Am 16 4 (2005) 589-594 Review
7. DiAngelo D.J., and Foley K.T. An improved biomechanical testing protocol for evaluating spinal arthroplasty and motion preservation devices in a multilevel human cadaveric cervical model. Neurosurg Focus 17 3 (2004) E4
8. DiAngelo D.J., Foley K.T., Morrow B.R., Schwab J.S., Song J., German J.W., et al. In vitro biomechanics of cervical disc arthroplasty with the ProDisc-C total disc implant. Neurosurg Focus 17 3 (2004) E7
9. Chang U.K., Kim D.H., Lee M.C., Willenberg R., Kim S.H., and Lim J. Range of motion change after cervical arthroplasty with ProDisc-C and prestige artificial discs compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 7 1 (2007) 40-46
10. Dmitriev A.E., Cunningham B.W., Hu N., Sell G., Vigna F., and McAfee P.C. Adjacent level intradiscal pressure and segmental kinematics following a cervical total disc arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine 30 10 (2005) 1165-1172
11. Wigfield C.C., Skrzypiec D., Jackowski A., and Adams M.A. Internal stress distribution in cervical intervertebral discs: the influence of an artificial cervical joint and simulated anterior interbody fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 16 5 (2003) 441-449
12. Pickett G.E., Rouleau J.P., and Duggal N. Kinematic analysis of the cervical spine following implantation of an artificial cervical disc. Spine 30 17 (2005) 1949-1954
13. Denoziere G., and Ku D.N. Biomechanical comparison between fusion of two vertebrae and implantation of an artificial intervertebral disc. J Biomech 39 4 (2006) 766-775
14. Goel V.K., Grauer J.N., Patel T.Ch., Biyani A., Sairyo K., Vishnubhotla S., et al. Effects of Charité artificial disc on the implanted and adjacent spinal segments mechanics using a hybrid testing protocol. Spine 30 24 (2005) 2755-2764
15. Dooris A.P., Goel V.K., Grosland N.M., Gilbertson L.G., and Wilder D.G. Load-sharing between anterior and posterior elements in a lumbar motion segment implanted with an artificial disc. Spine 26 6 (2001) E122-E129
16. Ha S.K. Finite element modeling of multi-level cervical spinal segments (C3-C6) and biomechanical analysis of an elastomer-type prosthetic disc. Med Eng Phys 28 6 (2006) 534-541
17. Galbusera F., Fantigrossi A., Raimondi M.T., Sassi M., Fornari M., and Assietti R. Biomechanics of the C5-C6 spinal unit before and after placement of a disc prosthesis. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 5 4 (2006) 253-261
18. Yoganandan N., Kumaresan S.C., Voo L., Pintar F.A., and Larson S.J. Finite element modeling of the C4-C6 cervical spine unit. Med Eng Phys 18 7 (1996) 569-574
19. Yoganandan N., Kumaresan S., and Pintar F.A. Geometric and mechanical properties of human cervical spine ligaments. J Biomech Eng 122 6 (2000) 623-629
20. Haghpanahi M., and Mapar R. Development of a parametric finite element model of lower cervical spine in sagittal plane. Conf Proc IEEE Med Eng Biol Soc 1 (2006) 1739-1741
21. Panjabi M.M. Hybrid multidirectional test method to evaluate spinal adjacent-level effects. Clin Biomech 22 3 (2007) 257-265
22. Wilke H.J., Wenger K., and Claes L. Testing criteria for spinal implants: recommendations for the standardization of in vitro stability testing of spinal implants. Eur Spine J 7 2 (1998) 148-154
23. Penning L., and Wilmink J.T. Rotation of the cervical spine. A CT study in normal subjects. Spine 12 8 (1987) 732-738
24. McCane B., Abbott J.H., and King T. On calculating the finite centre of rotation for rigid planar motion. Med Eng Phys 27 1 (2004) 75-79
25. Eaton J.W. GNU octave manual (2002), Publisher: Network Theory Limited
26. Wheeldon J.A., Pintar F.A., Knowles S., and Yoganandan N. Experimental flexion/extension data corridors for validation of finite element models of the young, normal cervical spine. J Biomech 39 2 (2006) 375-380
27. Yoganandan N., Kumaresan S., and Pintar F.A. Biomechanics of the cervical spine. Part 2. Cervical spine soft tissue responses and biomechanical modelling. Clin Biomech 16 1 (2001) 1-27
28. Yin L., and Elliott D.M. A homogenization model of the annulus fibrosus. J Biomech 38 8 (2005) 1674-1684
29. Del Palomar A.P., Calvo B., and Doblaré M. An accurate finite element model of the cervical spine under quasi-static loading. J Biomech 41 3 (2008) 523-531
30. Rousseau M.A., Bonnet X., and Skalli W. Influence of the geometry of a ball-and-socket intervertebral prosthesis at the cervical spine: a finite element study. Spine 33 1 (2008) E10-E14
31. Chang U.K., Kim D.H., Lee M.C., Willenberg R., Kim S.H., and Lim J. Changes in adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force after cervical arthroplasty compared with cervical discectomy and fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 7 1 (2007) 33-39