Influence of the geometry of a ball-and-socket intervertebral prosthesis at the cervical spine: A finite element study

Spine

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2008, Pages

  Rousseau, Marc Antoine ^a   Bonnet, Xavier ^b   Skalli, Wafa ^b  

^a LABORATOIRE DE BIOMÉCANIQUE   (France)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Cervical spine; Finite element modeling; Total replacement

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BALL AND SOCKET INTERVERTEBRAL PROSTHESIS; BIOMECHANICS; CERVICAL SPINE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FORCE; GEOMETRY; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS; RANGE OF MOTION; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; BIOMECHANICS; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DISKECTOMY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; ROTATION; ZYGAPOPHYSEAL JOINT;

EID: 37649007392     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e62ea     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Wigfield CC, Gill SS, Nelson RJ, et al. The new Frenchay artificial cervical joint: results from a two-year pilot study. Spine 2002;22:2446-52.
2. Goffin J, Van Calenbergh F, van Loon J, et al. Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis: single-level and bi-level. Spine 2003;24:2673-8.
3. Pickett GE, Rouleau JP, Duggal N. Kinematic analysis of the cervical spine following implantation of an artificial cervical disc. Spine 2005;17:1949-54.
4. Puttlitz CM, Rousseau MA, Xu Z, et al. Intervertebral disc replacement maintains cervical spine kinetics. Spine 2004;24:2809-14.
5. Dmitriev AE, Cunningham BW, Hu N, et al. Adjacent level intradiscal pressure and segmental kinematics following a cervical total disc arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine 2005;10:1165-72.
6. Dooris AP, Goel VK, Grosland NM, et al. Load-sharing between anterior and posterior elements in a lumbar motion segment implanted with an artificial disc. Spine 2001;6:E122-E129.
7. Goel VK, Grauer JN, Patel T, et al. Effects of charite artificial disc on the implanted and adjacent spinal segments mechanics using a hybrid testing protocol. Spine 2005;24:2755-64.
8. Rohlmann A, Zander T, Bergmann G. Effect of total disc replacement with ProDisc on intersegmental rotation of the lumbar spine. Spine 2005;7:738-43.
9. Noailly J, Lacroix D, Planell JA. Finite element study of a novel intervertebral disc substitute. Spine 2005;20:2257-64.
10. Denoziere G, Ku DN. Biomechanical comparison between fusion of two vertebrae and implantation of an artificial intervertebral disc. J Biomech 2006;4:766-75.
11. Ha SK. Finite element modeling of multi-level cervical spinal segments (C3-C6) and biomechanical analysis of an elastomer-type prosthetic disc. Med Eng Phys 2006;6:534-41.
12. Maurel N, Lavaste F, Skalli W. A three-dimensional parameterized finite element model of the lower cervical spine. Study of the influence of the posterior articular facets. J Biomech 1997;9:921-31.
13. Skalli W, Lavaste F, Descrimes JL. Quantification of three-dimensional vertebral rotations in scoliosis: what are the true values? Spine 1995;5:546-53.
14. Dvorak J, Panjabi MM, Novotny JE, et al. In vivo flexion/extension of the normal cervical spine. J Orthop Res 1991;6:828-34.
15. Dvorak J, Panjabi MM, Grob D, et al. Clinical validation of functional flexion/extension radiographs of the cervical spine. Spine 1993;1:120-7.
16. Amevo B, Aprill C, Bogduk N. Abnormal instantaneous axes of rotation in patients with neck pain. Spine 1992;7:748-56.
17. van Mameren H, Sanches H, Beursgens J, et al. Cervical spine motion in the sagittal plane. II. Position of segmental averaged instantaneous centers of rotation - a cineradiographic study. Spine 1992;5:467-74.