Hybrid multidirectional test method to evaluate spinal adjacent-level effects

Clinical Biomechanics

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 257-265

  Panjabi, Manohar M ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Adjacent level effects; Biomechanics; Flexibility; Hybrid method; Spine testing

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; DIAGNOSIS; RESEARCH LABORATORIES; STATISTICAL METHODS;

ADJACENT-LEVEL EFFECTS; FLEXIBILITY; HYBRID METHOD; SPINE TESTING;

HEALTH CARE;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; IMPLANT; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; LABORATORY; LIGAMENT INJURY; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RANGE OF MOTION; ROTATION; SPINE FUSION; SPINE MOBILITY; STATISTICAL PARAMETERS;

BIOMECHANICS; HUMANS; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; ROTATION; SPINAL FUSION; SPINE;

EID: 33846842325     PISSN: 02680033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.08.006     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Abumi K., Panjabi M.M., Kramer K.M., Duranceau J., Oxland T., and Crisco J.J. Biomechanical evaluation of lumbar spinal stability after graded facetectomies. Spine 15 (1990) 1142-1147
2. Axelsson P., Johnsson R., and Stromqvist B. The spondylolytic vertebra and its adjacent segment. Mobility measured before and after posterolateral fusion. Spine 22 (1997) 414-417
3. Bastian L., Lange U., Knop C., Tusch G., and Blauth M. Evaluation of the mobility of adjacent segments after posterior thoracolumbar fixation: a biomechanical study. Eur. Spine J. 10 (2001) 295-300
4. Bertagnoli R., Duggal N., Pickett G.E., Wigfield C.C., Gill S.S., Karg A., and Voigt S. Cervical total disc replacement, part two: clinical results. Orthop. Clin. North Am. 36 (2005) 355-362
5. Blumenthal S.L., Ohnmeiss D.D., Guyer R., Hochschuler S., McAfee P., Garcia R., Salib R., Yuan H., Lee C., Bertagnoli R., Bryan V., and Winter R. Artificial intervertebral discs and beyond: a North American Spine Society Annual Meeting symposium. Spine J. 2 (2002) 460-463
6. Buttermann G.R., and Beaubien B.P. Stiffness of prosthetic nucleus determines stiffness of reconstructed lumbar calf disc. Spine J. 4 (2004) 265-274
7. Chow D.H., Luk K.D., Evans J.H., and Leong J.C. Effects of short anterior lumbar interbody fusion on biomechanics of neighboring unfused segments. Spine 21 (1996) 549-555
8. Cunningham B.W., Kotani Y., McNulty P.S., Cappuccino A., and McAfee P.C. The effect of spinal destabilization and instrumentation on lumbar intradiscal pressure: an in vitro biomechanical analysis. Spine 22 (1997) 2655-2663
9. Delamarter R.B., Fribourg D.M., Kanim L.E., and Bae H. ProDisc artificial total lumbar disc replacement: introduction and early results from the United States clinical trial. Spine 28 (2003) S167-S175
10. DiAngelo D.J., Roberston J.T., Metcalf N.H., McVay B.J., and Davis R.C. Biomechanical testing of an artificial cervical joint and an anterior cervical plate. J. Spinal Disord. Tech. 16 (2003) 314-323
11. DiAngelo D.J., Foley K.T., Morrow B.R., Schwab J.S., Song J., German J.W., and Blair E. In vitro biomechanics of cervical disc arthroplasty with the ProDisc-C total disc implant. Neurosurg. Focus 17 (2004) E7
12. Dmitriev A.E., Cunningham B.W., Hu N., Sell G., Vigna F., and McAfee P.C. Adjacent level intradiscal pressure and segmental kinematics following a cervical total disc arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine 30 (2005) 1165-1172
13. Eck J.C., Humphreys S.C., and Hodges S.D. Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion: a review of clinical, biomechanical, and radiologic studies. Am. J. Orthop. 28 (1999) 336-340
14. Eck J.C., Humphreys S.C., Lim T.H., Jeong S.T., Kim J.G., Hodges S.D., and An H.S. Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine 27 (2002) 2431-2434
15. Frymoyer J.W., Hanley Jr. E.N., Howe J., Kuhlmann D., and Matteri R.E. A comparison of radiographic findings in fusion and nonfusion patients ten or more years following lumbar disc surgery. Spine 4 (1979) 435-440
16. Fuller D.A., Kirkpatrick J.S., Emery S.E., Wilber R.G., and Davy D.T. A kinematic study of the cervical spine before and after segmental arthrodesis. Spine 23 (1998) 1649-1656
17. Goel V.K., Nishiyama K., Weinstein J.N., and Liu Y.K. Mechanical properties of lumbar spinal motion segments as affected by partial disc removal. Spine 11 (1986) 1008-1012
18. Goel V.K., Grauer J.N., Patel T., Biyani A., Sairyo K., Vishnubhotla S., Matyas A., Cowgill I., Shaw M., Long R., Dick D., Panjabi M.M., and Serhan H. Effects of charite artificial disc on the implanted and adjacent spinal segments mechanics using a hybrid testing protocol. Spine 30 (2005) 2755-2764
19. Goffin J., Casey A., Kehr P., Liebig K., Lind B., Logroscino C., Pointillart V., Van Calenbergh F., and Van Loon J. Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis. Neurosurgery 51 (2002) 840-845 discussion 845-847
20. Goffin J., Geusens E., Vantomme N., Quintens E., Waerzeggers Y., Depreitere B., Van Calenbergh F., and Van Loon J. Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J. Spinal Disord. 17 (2004) 79-85
21. Grassmann S., Oxland T.R., Gerich U., and Nolte L.P. Constrained testing conditions affect the axial rotation response of lumbar functional spinal units. Spine 23 (1998) 1155-1162
22. Guehring T., Unglaub F., Lorenz H., Omlor G., Wilke H.J., and Kroeber M.W. Intradiscal pressure measurements in normal discs, compressed discs and compressed discs treated with axial posterior disc distraction: an experimental study on the rabbit lumbar spine model. Eur. Spine J. (2005)
23. Guyer R.D., and Ohnmeiss D.D. Intervertebral disc prostheses. Spine 28 (2003) S15-S23
24. Hilibrand A.S., Carlson G.D., Palumbo M.A., Jones P.K., and Bohlman H.H. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 81 (1999) 519-528
25. Hitchon P.W., Eichholz K., Barry C., Rubenbauer P., Ingalhalikar A., Nakamura S., Follett K., Lim T.H., and Torner J. Biomechanical studies of an artificial disc implant in the human cadaveric spine. J. Neurosurg. Spine 2 (2005) 339-343
26. Kellgren J.H., and Lawrence J.S. Osteo-arthrosis and disk degeneration in an urban population. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 17 (1958) 388-397
27. Klara P.M., and Ray C.D. Artificial nucleus replacement: clinical experience. Spine 27 (2002) 1374-1377
28. Kotani Y., Abumi K., Shikinami Y., Takada T., Kadoya K., Shimamoto N., Ito M., Kadosawa T., Fujinaga T., and Kaneda K. Artificial intervertebral disc replacement using bioactive three-dimensional fabric: design, development, and preliminary animal study. Spine 27 (2002) 929-935 discussion 935-936
29. Kotani Y., Cunningham B.W., Abumi K., Dmitriev A.E., Ito M., Hu N., Shikinami Y., McAfee P.C., and Minami A. Multidirectional flexibility analysis of cervical artificial disc reconstruction: in vitro human cadaveric spine model. J. Neurosurg. Spine 2 (2005) 188-194
30. Lee C.K. Accelerated degeneration of the segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion. Spine 13 (1988) 375-377
31. Lindsey D.P., Swanson K.E., Fuchs P., Hsu K.Y., Zucherman J.F., and Yerby S.A. The effects of an interspinous implant on the kinematics of the instrumented and adjacent levels in the lumbar spine. Spine 28 (2003) 2192-2197
32. Link H.D. History, design and biomechanics of the LINK SB Charite artificial disc. Eur. Spine J. 11 Suppl. 2 (2002) S98-S105
33. Lunsford L.D., Bissonette D.J., Jannetta P.J., Sheptak P.E., and Zorub D.S. Anterior surgery for cervical disc disease. Part 1: treatment of lateral cervical disc herniation in 253 cases. J. Neurosurg. 53 (1980) 1-11
34. Malcolmson G., Teng E., Henderson G., Tominaga Y., and Panjabi M.M. Hybrid testing for adjacent- and other-level effects due to Charité disc prosthesis versus simulated fusion (2004) 61-68
35. McAfee P.C., Fedder I.L., Saiedy S., Shucosky E.M., and Cunningham B.W. SB Charite disc replacement: report of 60 prospective randomized cases in a US center. J. Spinal Disord. Tech. 16 (2003) 424-433
36. Minns R.J., and Walsh W.K. Preliminary design and experimental studies of a novel soft implant for correcting sagittal plane instability in the lumbar spine. Spine 22 (1997) 1819-1825 discussion 1826-1827
37. Niosi C.A., Zhu Q.A., Wilson D.C., Keynan O., Wilson D.R., and Oxland T.R. Biomechanical characterization of the three-dimensional kinematic behaviour of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system: an in vitro study. Eur. Spine J. (2005)
38. Oda T., Panjabi M.M., and Kato Y. The effects of pedicle screw adjustments on the anatomical reduction of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Eur. Spine J. 10 (2001) 505-511
39. O'Leary P., Nicolakis M., Lorenz M.A., Voronov L.I., Zindrick M.R., Ghanayem A., Havey R.M., Carandang G., Sartori M., Gaitanis I.N., Fronczak S., and Patwardhan A.G. Response of Charite total disc replacement under physiologic loads: prosthesis component motion patterns. Spine J. 5 (2005) 590-599
40. Oxland T.R., Panjabi M.M., and Lin R.M. Axes of motion of thoracolumbar burst fractures. J. Spinal Disord. 7 (1994) 130-138
41. Panjabi M.M. Biomechanical evaluation of spinal fixation devices: I. A conceptual framework. Spine 13 (1988) 1129-1134
42. Panjabi, M.M., 2002. Biomechanical testing to identify adjacent-level effects. In: World Congress of Biomechanics. Calgary, Canada.
43. Panjabi M.M., Brand Jr. R.A., and White III A.A. Three-dimensional flexibility and stiffness properties of the human thoracic spine. J. Biomech. 9 (1976) 185-192
44. Panjabi M.M., Goel V.K., and Takata K. Physiologic strains in the lumbar spinal ligaments. An in vitro biomechanical study 1981 Volvo Award in Biomechanics. Spine 7 (1982) 192-203
45. Panjabi M.M., Krag M.H., and Chung T.Q. Effects of disc injury on mechanical behavior of the human spine. Spine 9 (1984) 707-713
46. Panjabi M.M., Abumi K., Duranceau J., and Crisco J.J. Biomechanical evaluation of spinal fixation devices: II. Stability provided by eight internal fixation devices. Spine 13 (1988) 1135-1140
47. Panjabi M.M., Oxland T.R., Lin R.M., and McGowen T.W. Thoracolumbar burst fracture. A biomechanical investigation of its multidirectional flexibility. Spine 19 (1994) 578-585
48. Panjabi M.M., Cholewicki J., Nibu K., Grauer J., and Vahldiek M. Capsular ligament stretches during in vitro whiplash simulations. J. Spinal Disord. 11 (1998) 227-232
49. Panjabi M.M., Isomi T., and Wang J.L. Loosening at the screw-vertebra junction in multilevel anterior cervical plate constructs. Spine 24 (1999) 2383-2388
50. Panjabi M.M., Kato Y., Hoffman H., Cholewicki J., and Krag M. A study of stiffness protocol as exemplified by testing of a burst fracture model in sagittal plane. Spine 25 (2000) 2748-2754
51. Panjabi M.M., Miura T., Cripton P.A., Wang J.L., Nain A.S., and DuBois C. Development of a system for in vitro neck muscle force replication in whole cervical spine experiments. Spine 26 (2001) 2214-2219
52. Panjabi, M.M., Malcolmson, G., Teng, E., Tominaga, Y., Henderson, G., 2006. Hybrid adjacent-level testing of lumbar Charite discs versus fusions. Spine, in press.
53. Patwardhan A.G., Havey R.M., Meade K.P., Lee B., and Dunlap B. A follower load increases the load-carrying capacity of the lumbar spine in compression. Spine 24 (1999) 1003-1009
54. Rao R.D., David K.S., and Wang M. Biomechanical changes at adjacent segments following anterior lumbar interbody fusion using tapered cages. Spine 30 (2005) 2772-2776
55. Rao R.D., Wang M., McGrady L.M., Perlewitz T.J., and David K.S. Does anterior plating of the cervical spine predispose to adjacent segment changes?. Spine 30 (2005) 2788-2792 discussion 2793
56. Rohlmann A., Neller S., Bergmann G., Graichen F., Claes L., and Wilke H.J. Effect of an internal fixator and a bone graft on intersegmental spinal motion and intradiscal pressure in the adjacent regions. Eur. Spine J. 10 (2001) 301-308
57. Schendel M.J., Wood K.B., Buttermann G.R., Lewis J.L., and Ogilvie J.W. Experimental measurement of ligament force, facet force, and segment motion in the human lumbar spine. J. Biomech. 26 (1993) 427-438
58. Schlegel J.D., Smith J.A., and Schleusener R.L. Lumbar motion segment pathology adjacent to thoracolumbar, lumbar, and lumbosacral fusions. Spine 21 (1996) 970-981
59. Schmoelz W., Huber J.F., Nydegger T., Dipl I., Claes L., and Wilke H.J. Dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine and its effects on adjacent segments: an in vitro experiment. J. Spinal Disord. Tech. 16 (2003) 418-423
60. Senegas J. Mechanical supplementation by non-rigid fixation in degenerative intervertebral lumbar segments: the Wallis system. Eur. Spine J. 11 Suppl. 2 (2002) S164-S169
61. Sengupta D.K. Dynamic stabilization devices in the treatment of low back pain. Orthop. Clin. North Am. 35 (2004) 43-56
62. Shono Y., Kaneda K., Abumi K., McAfee P.C., and Cunningham B.W. Stability of posterior spinal instrumentation and its effects on adjacent motion segments in the lumbosacral spine. Spine 23 (1998) 1550-1558
63. Sudo H., Oda I., Abumi K., Ito M., Kotani Y., Hojo Y., and Minami A. In vitro biomechanical effects of reconstruction on adjacent motion segment: comparison of aligned/kyphotic posterolateral fusion with aligned posterior lumbar interbody fusion/posterolateral fusion. J. Neurosurg. 99 (2003) 221-228
64. Valdevit A., and Errico T.J. Design and evaluation of the FlexiCore metal-on-metal intervertebral disc prosthesis. Spine J. 4 (2004) 276S-288S
65. Weinhoffer S.L., Guyer R.D., Herbert M., and Griffith S.L. Intradiscal pressure measurements above an instrumented fusion. A cadaveric study. Spine 20 (1995) 526-531
66. White III A.A., and Panjabi M.M. Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine. second ed. (1990), J.B. Lippincott Co, Philadelphia
67. Wilke H.J., Claes L., Schmitt H., and Wolf S. A universal spine tester for in vitro experiments with muscle force simulation. Eur. Spine J. 3 (1994) 91-97
68. Wilke H.J., Wenger K., and Claes L. Testing criteria for spinal implants: recommendations for the standardization of in vitro stability testing of spinal implants. Eur. Spine J. 7 (1998) 148-154
69. Wilke H.J., Kemmerich V., Claes L.E., and Arand M. Combined anteroposterior spinal fixation provides superior stabilisation to a single anterior or posterior procedure. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 83 (2001) 609-617
70. Yoshimoto H., Ito M., Abumi K., Kotani Y., Shono Y., Takada T., and Minami A. A retrospective radiographic analysis of subaxial sagittal alignment after posterior C1-C2 fusion. Spine 29 (2004) 175-181