Range of motion change after cervical arthroplasty with ProDisc-C and Prestige artificial discs compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 40-46

  Chang, Ung Kyu ^a   Kim, Daniel H ^b   Lee, Max C ^c   Willenberg, Rafer ^d   Kim, Se Hoon ^e   Lim, Jesse ^e  

^a Korea Institute of Radiation and Medical Science   (South Korea)

^b OCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION   (United States)

^c Milwaukee Neurological Institute   (United States)

^d STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e STANFORD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Adjacent segment degeneration; Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; Biomechanical testing; Cervical arthroplasty; Range of motion

Indexed keywords

ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISCECTOMY; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; CADAVER; CERVICAL ARTHROPLASTY; CERVICAL ARTIFICIAL DISC; CERVICAL SPINE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMPLANTATION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISKECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RANGE OF MOTION; ROTATION; SPINE FUSION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ARTHROPLASTY; CADAVER; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; DISKECTOMY; HUMANS; MOTION; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; ROTATION; SPINAL FUSION; SPINE;

EID: 34447530891     PISSN: 15475654     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3171/SPI-07/07/040     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Anderson PA, Rouleau JP, Toth JM, Riew KD: A comparison of simulator-tested and -retrieved cervical disc prostheses. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004. J Neurosurg Spine 1:202-210, 2004
2. Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Pfeiffer F, Fenk-Mayer A, Lawrence JP, Kershaw T, et al: Early results after ProDisc-C cervical disc replacement. J Neurosurg Spine 2:403-410, 2005
3. Bohlman HH, Emery SE, Goodfellow DB, Jones PK: Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy. Long-term follow-up of one hundred and twenty-two patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:1298-1307, 1993
4. Cripton PA, Dumas GA, Nolte LP: A minimally disruptive technique for measuring intervertebral disc pressure in vitro: application to the cervical spine. J Biomech 34:545-549, 2001
5. DiAngelo DJ, Foley KT: An improved biomechanical testing protocol for evaluating spinal arthroplasty and motion preservation devices in a multilevel human cadaveric cervical model. Neurosurg Focus 17(3):E4, 2004
6. DiAngelo DJ, Foley KT, Morrow BR, Schwab JS, Song J, German JW, et al: In vitro biomechanics of cervical disc arthroplasty with the ProDisc-C total disc implant. Neurosurg Focus 17(3):E7, 2004
7. DiAngelo DJ, Roberston JT, Metcalf NH, McVay BJ, Davis RC: Biomechanical testing of an artificial cervical joint and an anterior cervical plate. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:314-323, 2003
8. Duggal N, Pickett GE, Mitsis DK, Keller JL: Early clinical and biomechanical results following cervical arthroplasty. Neurosurg Focus 17(3):E9, 2004
9. Durbhakula MM, Ghiselli G: Cervical total disc replacement, part I: rationale, biomechanics, and implant types. Orthop Clin North Am 36:349-354, 2005
10. Dvorak J, Froehlich D, Penning L, Baumgartner H, Panjabi MM: Functional radiographic diagnosis of the cervical spine: flexion/extension. Spine 13:748-755, 1988
11. Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim TH, Jeong ST, Kim JG, Hodges SD, et al: Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine 27:2431-2434, 2002
12. Goffin J, Geusens E, Vantomme N, Quintens E, Waerzeggers Y, Depreitere B, et al: Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 17(2):79-85, 2004
13. Goffin J, Van Calenbergh F, van Loon J, Casey A, Kehr P, Liebig K, et al: Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis: single-level and bi-level. Spine 28:2673-2678, 2003
14. Goffin J, Van Loon J, Van Calenbergh F, Plets C: Long-term results after anterior cervical fusion and osteosynthetic stabilization for fractures and/or dislocations of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord 8:500-508, 1995
15. Gore DR, Sepic SB: Anterior discectomy and fusion for painful cervical disc disease. A report of 50 patients with an average follow-up of 21 years. Spine 23:2047-2051, 1998
16. Hallab N, Link HD, McAfee PC: Biomaterial optimization in total disc arthroplasty. Spine 28:S139-S152, 2003
17. Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, Jones PK, Bohlman HH: Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:519-528, 1999
18. Katsuura A, Hukuda S, Saruhashi Y, Mori K: Kyphotic malalignment after anterior cervical fusion is one of the factors promoting the degenerative process in adjacent intervertebral levels. Eur Spine J 10:320-324, 2001
19. Kotani Y, Cunningham BW, Abumi K, Dmitriev AE, Ito M, Hu N, et al: Multidirectional flexibility analysis of cervical artificial disc reconstruction: in vitro human cadaveric spine model. J Neurosurg Spine 2:188-194, 2005
20. Le Huec J, Basso Y, Mathews H, Mehbod S, Aunoble S, Friesem T, et al: The effect of single-level, total disc arthroplasty on sagittal balance parameters: a prospective study. Eur Spine J 14:480-486, 2005
21. Lind B, Sihlbom H, Nordwall A, Malchau H: Normal range of motion of the cervical spine. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 70:692-695, 1989
22. Matsunaga S, Kabayama S, Yamamoto T, Yone K, Sakou T, Nakanishi K: Strain on intervertebral discs after anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Spine 24:670-675, 1999
23. McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Dmitriev A, Hu N, Woo Kim S, Cappuccino A, et al: Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine 28:S176-S185, 2003
24. Miura T, Panjabi MM, Cripton PA: A method to simulate in vivo cervical spine kinematics using in vitro compressive preload. Spine 27:43-48, 2002
25. Mummaneni PV, Haid RW: The future in the care of the cervical spine: interbody fusion and arthroplasty. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004. J Neurosurg Spine 1:155-159, 2004
26. Murphey F, Simmons JC, Brunson B: Surgical treatment of laterally ruptured cervical disc. Review of 648 cases, 1939 to 1972. J Neurosurg 38:679-683, 1973
27. Oskouian RJ, Whitehill R, Samii A, Shaffrey ME, Johnson JP, Shaffrey CI: The future of spinal arthroplasty: a biomaterial perspective. Neurosurg Focus 17(3):E2, 2004
28. Porchet F, Metcalf NH: Clinical outcomes with the Prestige II cervical disc: preliminary results from a prospective randomized clinical trial. Neurosurg Focus 17(3):E6, 2004
29. Pracyk JB, Traynelis VC: Treatment of the painful motion segment: cervical arthroplasty. Spine 30 (16 Suppl):S23-S32, 2005
30. Puttlitz CM, Rousseau MA, Xu Z, Hu S, Tay BK, Lotz JC: Intervertebral disc replacement maintains cervical spine kinetics. Spine 29:2809-2814, 2004
31. Scoville WB: Types of cervical disk lesions and their surgical approaches. JAMA 196:479-481, 1966
32. Singh K, Vaccaro AR, Kim J, Lorenz EP, Lim TH, An HS: Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine reconstructive techniques after a multilevel corpectomy of the cervical spine. Spine 28:2352-2358, 2003
33. Smith HE, Wimberley DW, Vaccaro AR: Cervical arthroplasty: material properties. Neurosurg Focus 17(3):E3, 2004
34. White AA III, Panjabi MM (eds): Kinematics of the spine, in Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine, ed 2. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1990, pp 102-106
35. Wigfield CC, Gill SS, Nelson RJ, Metcalf NH, Robertson JT: The new Frenchay artificial cervical joint: results from a two-year pilot study. Spine 27:2446-2452, 2002
36. Wigfield CC, Skrzypiec D, Jackowski A, Adams MA: Internal stress distribution in cervical intervertebral discs: the influence of an artificial cervical joint and simulated anterior interbody fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:441-449, 2003