The relationship between organizational commitment and contextual performance among private club leaders

International Journal of Hospitality Management

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 53-62

  Cichy, Ronald F ^a   Cha, JaeMin ^a   Kim, SeungHyun ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

Confirmatory factor analysis; Contextual performance; Organizational commitment; Private club industry; Structural equation modeling

Indexed keywords

EID: 55649108432     PISSN: 02784319     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2008.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Anderson J., and Gerbing D. Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol. Bull. 103 3 (1988) 411-423
2. Allen N., and Meyer J. The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. J. Occup. Psychol. 63 1 (1990) 1-18
3. Allen N., and Meyer J. Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: an examination of construct validity. J. Vocational Behav. 49 (1996) 252-276
4. Angle H.L., and Lawson M.B. Organizational commitment and employees' performance ratings: both type of commitment and type of performance count. Psychol. Rep. 75 (1994) 1539-1551
5. Becker H. Notes on the concept of commitment. Am. J. Sociol. 66 (1960) 32-42
6. Bentein K., Stinglhamber F., and Vandenberghe C. Organization-, supervisor- and workgroup-directed commitments and citizenship behaviors: a comparison of models. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 11 (2002) 341-362
7. Bentler P. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol. Bull. 107 2 (1990) 238-246
8. Bentler P.M., and Bonett D.G. Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol. Bull. 88 3 (1980) 588-606
9. Bettencourt L., and Brown S. Customer-contact employees: relationships among workplace fairness, job satisfaction and prosocial service behaviors. J. Retailing 73 1 (1997) 39-61
10. Bettencourt L., Gwinner K., and Meuter M. A comparison of attitude, personality, and knowledge predictors of service-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors. J. Appl. Psychol. 86 (2001) 29-41
11. Blau P. Exchange and Power in Social Life (1964), Wiley, New York
12. Borman W., and Motowidlo S. Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In: Schmitt N., and Borman W. (Eds). Personnel Selection in Organizations (1993), Jossey Bass, San Francisco 71-98
13. Borman W., and Motowidlo S. Introduction: organizational citizenship behavior and contextual performance. Hum. Perform. 10 2 (1997) 67-99
14. Borman W., and Motowidlo S. Task performance and contextual performance: the meaning for personnel selection research. Hum. Perform. 10 2 (1997) 99-109
15. Bozionelos N. Casual path modeling: what it does and what it does not tell us. Career Dev. Int. 8 1 (2003) 5-11
16. Brewer A.M. Developing commitment between managers and employees. J. Managerial Psychol. 11 4 (1996) 24-34
17. Brief A., and Motowidlo S. Prosocial organizational behaviors. Acad. Manage. Rev. 11 (1986) 710-725
18. Chen Z., and Francesco A. The relationship between the three components of commitment and employee performance in China. J. Vocational Behav. 62 (2003) 490-510
19. Chen Z., Tsui A., and Farth J. Loyalty to supervisor vs. organizational commitment: relationships to employee performance in China. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 75 (2002) 339-356
20. Cichy R., Cha J., and Kim S.-H. Private club leaders' emotional intelligence: development and validation of a new measure of emotional intelligence. J. Hospitality Tourism Res. 31 1 (2007) 39-55
21. Clercq D., and Rius I. Organizational commitment in Mexican small and medium-sized firms: the role of work Status, organizational climate, and entrepreneurial orientation. J. Appl. Psychol. 45 4 (2007) 467-490
22. Cohen A. The relationship between multiple commitments and organizational citizenship behavior in Arab and Jewish culture. J. Vocational Behav. 69 (2006) 105-118
23. Conway J. Distinguishing contextual performance from task performance for managerial jobs. J. Appl. Psychol. 84 1 (1999) 3-13
24. Dawley D., Stephens R., and Stephens D. Dimensionality of organizational commitment in volunteer workers: chamber of commerce board members and role fulfillment. J. Vocational Behav. 67 3 (2005) 511-525
25. Doty H., and Glick W. Common methods bias: does common methods variance really bias results?. Organ. Res. Methods 1 4 (1998) 374-406
26. Eisenberger R., Fasolo P., and Davis-LaMastro V. Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. J. Appl. Psychol. 75 (1990) 51-59
27. Gakovic A., and Tetrick L. Perceived organizational support and work status: a comparison of the employment relationships of part-time and full-time employees attending university classes. J. Organ. Behav. 24 (2003) 649-666
28. Gautam T., Dick R., Wagner U., Upadhyay N., and Davis A. Organizational citizenship behavior and organizational commitment in Nepal. Asian J. Soc. Psychol. 8 (2005) 305-314
29. Gellatly I.R., Meyer J.P., and Luchak A. Combined effects of the three commitment Components on focal and discretionary behaviors: a test of Meyer and Herscovitch's Propositions. J. Vocational Behav. 69 2 (2006) 331-335
30. Hackett R., Bycio P., and Hausdorf P. Further assessment of Meyer and Allen's (1991) three-component model of organizational commitment. J. Appl. Psychol. 79 (1994) 15-23
31. Jaramillo F., Mulki J., and Marshall G. A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational commitment and salesperson job performance: 25 years of research. J. Bus. Res. 58 6 (2005) 705-714
32. Johnson J. The relative importance of task and contextual performance dimensions to supervisor judgments of overall performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 86 5 (2001) 984-996
33. Kline R. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (1998), The Guilford Press, New York
34. Ko J., Price J., and Muller C. Assessment of Meyer and Allen's three-component model of organizational commitment in South Korea. J. Appl. Psychol. 82 (1997) 961-973
35. Lee K., Allen N., Meyer J., and Rhee K. Cross-cultural generalizability of the three-component model of organizational commitment: an application to South Korea. Appl. Psychol.: Int. Rev. 50 (2001) 594-614
36. Luchak A., and Gellatly I. A comparison of linear and nonlinear relations between organizational commitment and work outcomes. J. Appl. Psychol. 92 3 (2007) 786-793
37. Mathieu J., and Zajac D. A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychol. Bull. 108 2 (1990) 171-194
38. Meyer J. Organizational commitment. In: Cooper C., and Robertson I. (Eds). International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology vol. 12 (1997), Wiley, New York 175-228
39. Meyer J., and Allen N. Testing the "side-bet theory" of organizational commitment: some methodological considerations. J. Appl. Psychol. 69 3 (1984) 372-378
40. Meyer J., and Allen N. A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Hum. Resour. Manage. Rev. 1 1 (1991) 61-89
41. Meyer J., and Allen N. Commitment in the Workplace: Theory, Research, and Application (1997), Sage, Thousand Oaks
42. Meyer J., Allen N., and Smith C. Commitment to organizations and occupations: extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. J. Appl. Psychol. 78 4 (1993) 538-551
43. Meyer J., Paunonen S., Gellatly I., Goffin R., and Jackson D. Organizational commitment and job performance: it's the nature of the commitment that counts. J. Appl. Psychol. 74 (1989) 152-156
44. Meyer J., Stanley D., Herscovitch L., and Topolnytsky L. Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: a meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. J. Vocational Behav. 61 (2002) 20-52
45. Meyer J., Becker T., and Vandenberghe C. Employee commitment and motivation: a conceptual analysis and integrative model. J. Appl. Psychol. 89 6 (2004) 991-1007
46. Meyer J., Srinivas E., Jaydeep L., and Laryssa T. Employee commitment and support for an organizational change: test of the three-component model in two cultures. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 80 2 (2007) 185-211
47. Motowidlo S., and Van Scotter J. Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 79 4 (1994) 475-480
48. Mowday R., Porter L., and Steers R. Employee-organizational Linkage: the Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism, and Turnover (1982), Academic Press, New York
49. Mowday R., Porter L., and Steers R. The measurement of organizational commitment. J. Vocational Behav. 14 (1979) 224-247
50. Nevitt J., and Hancock C. Improving the root mean square error of approximation for nonnormal conditions in structural equation modeling. J. Exp. Ed. 68 (2000) 251-268
51. Nunnally J. Psychometric Theory (1978), McGraw-Hill, New York
52. Organ D. Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome (1988), Lexington Books, Lexington
53. Organ D. Organizational citizenship behavior: it's construct clean-up time. Hum. Perform. 10 (1997) 85-97
54. Organ D., and Ryan K. A meta-analytic review of attitudinal of dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Pers. Psychol. 48 (1995) 775-802
55. Paulin M., Ferguson R., and Bergeron J. Service climate and organizational commitment: the importance of customer linkage. J. Bus. Res. 59 8 (2006) 906-915
56. Porter L., Steers R., Mowday R., and Boulian P. Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. J. Appl. Psychol. 59 5 (1974) 603-609
57. Preston J., and Brown W. Commitment and performance of nonprofit board members. Nonprofit Manage. Leadersh. 15 2 (2004) 221-238
58. Randall D., Fedor D., and Longenecker C. The behavioral expression of organizational commitment. J. Vocational Behav. 36 (1990) 210-224
59. Riketta M. Attitudinal organizational commitment and job performance: a meta-analysis. J. Organ. Behav. 23 (2002) 257-266
60. Shaw J., Delery J., and Abdulla M. Organization al commitment and performance among guest workers and citizens of an Arab country. J. Bus. Res. 56 (2003) 1021-1030
61. Sheldon M. Investments and involvements as mechanisms producing commitment to the organization. Adm. Sci. Q. 16 (1971) 142-150
62. Shore L., and Wayne S. Commitment and employee behavior: comparison of affective commitment and continuance commitment with perceived organizational support. J. Appl. Psychol. 78 5 (1993) 774-780
63. Sinclair R., Tucker J., Cullen J., and Wright C. Performance differences among four organizational commitment profiles. J. Appl. Psychol. 90 6 (2005) 1280-1287
64. Somers M., and Birnbaum D. Work-related commitment and job performance: it's also the nature of the performance that counts. J. Organ. Behav. 19 (1998) 621-634
65. Spector P. Method variance in organizational research: truth or urban legend?. Organ. Res. Methods 9 2 (2006) 221-232
66. Spiliopoulou M., Kruse R., Borgelt C., Nürnberger A., and Gaul W. From Data and Information Analysis to Knowledge Engineering (2006), Springer, New York
67. Suliman A., and Iles P. Is continuance commitment beneficial to organizations? Commitment-performance relationship: a new look. J. Managerial Psychol. 15 5 (2000) 407-422
68. Tucker L., and Lewis C. The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometerika 38 (1973) 1-10
69. Van Scotter J., and Motowidlo S. Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 81 5 (1996) 525-531
70. Williams L., and Anderson S. Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-group behaviors. J. Manage. 17 (1991) 601-617