Biological Properties of Acid Etched Titanium Implants: Effect of Sandblasting on Bone Anchorage

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 68, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 149-159

  Szmukler Moncler, S ^a,b,d   Perrin, D ^c   Ahossi, V ^c   Magnin, G ^c   Bernard, J P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^c DIJON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^d NONE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Acid etching; FE modeling; Sandblasting; SEM; SLA; Surface treatment; Torque

Indexed keywords

BONE; ETCHING; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); TORQUE;

MECHANICAL COUPLING; SANDBLASTING;

BIOMATERIALS;

TITANIUM;

ABRASIVE BLASTING; ADHESION; ARTICLE; BIOFINISHING; BONE ANCHORAGE; CEMENTATION; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; IMPLANT; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MAXILLA; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; ROUGHNESS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; SWINE; TORQUE;

EID: 1242336952     PISSN: 00219304     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.20003     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann SG, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants: A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:889-902.
2. Lazzara RJ, Testori T, Trisi P, Porter SS, Weinstein RL. A human histologic analysis of Osseotite and machined surfaces using implants with 2 opposing surfaces. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1999;19:3-16.
3. Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Lussi A, Higginbottom FL, Buser D. Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: A histometric study in the canine mandible. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;40:1-11.
4. Wilke HJ, Claes L, Steinemann S. The influence of various titanium surfaces on the interface shear strength between im-plants and bone. In: Heimke G, Soltész U, Lee AJC, editors. Clinical Materials. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1990. p 309-314.
5. Klokkevold PR, Nishimura RD, Adashi M, Caputo AM. Os-seointegration enhanced by chemical etching of the titanium surface. A torque removal study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implant Res 1997;8:442-447.
6. Klokkevold PR, Johnson P, Dadgostari S, Caputo A, Davies JE, Nishimura RD. Early endosseous integration enhanced by dual acid etching of titanium: A removal torque study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implant Res 2001;12:350-357.
7. Wong M, Eulenberger J, Schenk R, Hunziker E. Effect of surface topology on the osseointegration of implant materials in trabecular bone. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:1567-1575.
8. Baker DA, London RM, O'Neil RB. Rate of pull-out strength gain of dual-etched titanium implants: A comparative study in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;14:722-728
9. Steinemann SG, Claes L. U.S. Patent No. 5,456,723. Metallic implant anchorable to bone tissue for replacing a broken or diseased bone. October 10, 1995.
10. Szmukler-Moncler S, Simspon JP. Physico-chemical character-ization of a titanium textured surface prepared by sandblasting and acid etching. Transactions of the 5th World Biomaterials Congress, Toronto; 1996. p 837.
11. 3. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;39:77-85.
12. Beaty KD. U.S. Patent No. 5,876,453. Implant surface prepa-ration. March 2, 1999.
13. Szmukler-Moncler S, Testori T, Bernard JP. Etched implants: A comparative surface analysis of 4 dental implant systems. J Biomed Mater Res Appl Biomat; in press.
14. Buser D, Nydegger T, Hirt HP, Cochran DL, Nolte LP. Re-moval torque values of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:611-619.
15. Sennerby L, Thomsen P, Ericson LE. Ultrastructure of the bone-titanium interface in rabbits. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1992;3:262-271.
16. Gotfredsen K, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Anchorage of titanium implants with different surface characteristics: An experimental study in rabbits. Clin Implants Dent Relat Res 2000;2:120-128.
17. Bernard JP, Szmukler-Moncler S, Pessotto S, Belser U, Samson J. Histological and SEM analysis of reverse-torqued Brånemark and ITI implants in the canine mandible and maxilla. Presented at the 10th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Osseointegration, Dallas; 2002.
18. Buser D, Nydegger T, Oxland TR, Schenk RK, Cochran DL, Snétivy D, Nolte LP. The interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. A biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;45:75-83.
19. Bernard JP, Szmukler-Moncler S, Pessotto S, Vazquez L, Belser UC. The anchorage of Brånemark and ITI implants of different lengths. I. An experimental study in the canine mandible. Clin Oral Implant Res 2003;14:593-600.
20. Brånemark R, Ohmell LO, Skalak R, Clarlsson L, Brånemark P-I. Biomechanical characterization of osseointegration: an experimental in vivo investigation in the beagle dog. J Orthop Res 1998;16:61-69.
21. Perrin D, Szmukler-Moncler S, Echikou C, Pointaire P, Bernard JP. Bone response to alteration of surface topography and surface composition of sandblasted and acid etched (SLA) implants. Clin Oral Implant Res 2002;12:465-469.
22. Wennerberg A. On roughness and implant incorporation, Ph.D. thesis, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden; 1996.
23. Thomas T, Sayles RS. Some problems in the tribology of rough surfaces. Tribol Int 1978;11:163-168.
24. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Suggested guidelines for the topographic evaluation of implant surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:331-344.
25. Buser D, von Arx T. Surgical procedures in partially edentulous patients with ITI implants. Clin Oral Implant Res 2000; 11(Suppl):83-100.
26. van Steenberghe D et al. The applicability of osseointegrated implants in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism. A prospective multicenter study on 558 fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:272-281.
27. Lazzara R, Siddiqui AA, Binon P, Feldman SA, Weiner R, Philipps R, Gonshor A. Retrospective multicenter analysis of 3i endosseous dental implants placed over a 5-year period. Clin Oral Implant Res 1996;7:73-83.
28. Bahat O. Brånemark system implants in the posterior maxilla: Clinical study of 660 implants followed for 5 to 12 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:646-653.
29. Bernard JP, Belser UC, Szmuckler-Moncler S, Martinet JP, Attieh A. A 3-year success rate of short ITI implants in the posterior jaw. Med Buc Chir Buc 1995;1:11-18.
30. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, Belser UC, Lang NP. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1. 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implant Res 1997;8:161-172.
31. Brocard D, Barthet P, Baysse E, Duffort JF, Eller P, Justumus P, Marin P, Oscaby P, Simonet T, Benqué E, Brunel G. A multi-center report on 1002 consecutively placed ITI implants: A 7-year longitudinal study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:691-700.
32. Nedir R, Bischof M, Briaux JM, Beyer S, Szmukler-Moncler S, Bernard JP. A 7-year life table analysis from a prospective study on ITI implants with special emphasis on the use of short implants. Results from a private practice. Clin Oral Implant Res; in press.
33. Testori T, Wiseman L, Woolfe S, Porter SS. A prospective multicenter clinical study of the Osseotite implant: Four-year interim report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl 2001;16:193-200.
34. Testori T, Del Fabbro M, Feldman S, Vincenzi G, Sullivan G, Rossi R Jr, Anitua E, Bianchi F, Francetti L, Weinstein RL. A multi-center prospective evaluation of 2-months loaded Osseotite implants in the posterior jaws: 3-year follow-up results. Clin Oral Implant Res 2002;13:154-161.
35. Roccuzzo M, Bunino M, Prioglio F, Bianchi SD. Early loading of sandblasted and acid etched (SLA) implants: A prospective split-mouth comparative study. Clin Oral Implant Res 2001;12: 572-578.
36. Cochran DL, Buser D, ten Bruggenkate C, Weingart D, Taylor TM, Bernard JP, Simpson JP, Peters F. The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface. Early results from clinical trials on SLA implants. Clin Oral Implant Res 2002;13:144-153.
37. Rangert B, Eng M, Sullivan R, Jemt T. Load factor control for implants in the posterior partially edentulous segment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:360-370.
38. Belser UC, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Taylor TD. Prosthetic management of the partially dentate patient with fixed implants restorations. Clin Oral Implant Res 2000;11(Suppl): 126-145.
39. Hipp JA, Brunski JB, Shephard MS, Cochran GVB. Finite element models for implants in bone: Interfacial assumptions. In: Perren SM, Schneider E, editors. Biomechanics current interdisciplinary research. Dordredcht: Martinus Nijhoff; 1984. p 447.
40. Brunski JB. Biomechanical factors affecting the bone-dental implant interface. In: Clinical materials. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1992. p 53-201.
41. Brunski JB, Puelo DA, Nanci A. Biomaterials and biomechanics of oral and maxillo-facial implants: Current status and future developments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:15-46.
42. Van Oosterwyck H, Duyck J, Vander Sloten J, Van der Perre G, De Cooman M, Lievens S, Puers R, Naert I. The influence of bone mechanical properties and implant fixation upon bone loading around oral implants. Clin Oral Implant Res 1998;9: 407-418.
43. Brånemark R, Ohrnell LO, Nilsson P, Thomsen P. Biomechanical characterization of osseointegration during healing: An experimental in vivo study in the rat. Biomaterials 1997;18:969-978.
44. Takatsuka K, Yamamuro T, Nakamura T, Kokubo T. Bone bonding behavior of titanium alloy evaluated mechanically with detaching failure mode. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:157-163.
45. Johansson C, Albrektsson T. Integration of screw implants in the rabbit: A 1-year follow-up of removal torque of titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987;2: 69-75.
46. Brånemark PI, Lausmaa J, Ericson L, Thomsen P, Brånemark R, Skalak R. Anatomy of osseointegration and the transfer of load. In: Fonseca RJ, Davis WH editors. Reconstructive preprosthetic oral and maxillofacial surgery (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Saunders Company; 1995. p 165-224.
47. Quirynen M, Naert I, van Steenberghe D. Fixture design and overload influence on marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Brånemark system. Clin Oral Implant Res 1992;3:104-111.