Effects of implant microtopography on osteoblast cell attachment

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 175-181

  Keller, John C ^a   Schneider, Galen B ^a   Stanford, Clark M ^a   Kellogg, Bradley ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell attachment; Dental implants; Osteoblasts; Surface roughness; Titanium

Indexed keywords

TITANIUM;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL STRAIN 3T3; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; MOUSE; OSTEOBLAST; PHYSIOLOGY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH BRUSHING; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

3T3 CELLS; ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ANIMALS; CELL ADHESION; DENTAL POLISHING; MICE; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; OSTEOBLASTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 0041886732     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.ID.0000058309.77613.87     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Smith DC. Dental implants: Materials and design considerations. Int J Prosth. 1993; 6: 106-112.
2. Keller JC. Physical and biological characteristics of implant materials. Adv Dent Res. 1999; 13: 5-7.
3. Sykaras N, Iacopino AM, Marker VA, et al. Implant materials, designs and surface topographies: Their effect on osseointegration. A literature review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000; 15: 675-690.
4. Bowers KT, Keller JC, Randolph BA, et al. Optimization of surface micromorphology for enhanced osteoblast responses in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992; 7: 302-310.
5. Keller JC, Stanford CM, Wightman JP, et al. Characterizations of titanium implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res. 1994; 28: 939-946.
6. Placko HE, Mishra S, Weimer JJ, et al. Surface characterization of titanium based implant materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000; 15: 355-363.
7. Wennerberg A, Albrektson T, Andersson B. Design and surface characteristics of 13 commercially available oral implant systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993; 8: 622-633.
8. Kay JF. Calcium phosphate coatings for dental implants. Dent Clinic N Amer. 1992; 36: 1-24.
9. Ducheyne P. Titanium and calcium phosphate ceramic dental implants, surfaces, coatings and interfaces. J Oral Implantol. 1988; 19: 325-333.
10. Pilliar RM. Dental implants: Materials and design. J Can Dent Assoc. 1990; 56: 857-861.
11. Anselme K, Linez P, Bigerlle M, et al. The relative influence of the topography and chemistry of TiAL6V4 surfaces on osteoblastic cell behavior. Biomaterials. 2000; 21: 1567-1577.
12. Brunette DM, Rakay J, Chehroudi B. Behavior of osteoblasts on micromachined surfaces. In: Davies JE, ed. The Bone Biomaterial Interface. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 1991: 170-180.
13. Boyan BD, Sylvia VL, Liu Y, et al. Surface roughness mediates its effects on osteoblasts via protein kinase A and phospholipase A2. Biomaterials. 1999; 20: 2305-2310.
14. Cooper LF, Masuda T, Whitson SW, et al. Formation of mineralizing osteoblast cultures on machined, titanium oxide grit-blasted, and plasma-sprayed titanium surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999; 14: 37-47.
15. Schneider GB, Peripanayagam H, Clegg M, et al. Implant surface roughness affects osteoblast expression of Cbfa1. J Dent Res. 2003; 82(5): 372-376.
16. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, et al. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res. 1991; 25: 889-902.
17. Abrahamsson I, Zitzmann NU, Berglundh T, et al. Bone and soft tissue integration to titanium implants with different surface topography: An experimental study in the dog. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001; 16: 323-332.
18. Lazzara RJ, Testori T, Trisi P, et al. A human histologic analysis of Osseotite and machined surfaces using implants with two opposing surfaces. Int J Periodont Rest Dent. 1999; 19: 117-129.