Bone contact around osseointegrated implants: A histologic study of acid-etched and machined surfaces

Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 131-143

  Celletti, Renato ^a   Marinho, Vanessa C ^b   Traini, Tonino ^a   Orsini, Giovanna ^a   Bracchetti, Guido ^c   Perrotti, Vittoria ^a   Piattelli, Adriano ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHIETI   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c NONE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Acid etched; Bone contact; Machined implants

Indexed keywords

ETCHING; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); MEDICAL APPLICATIONS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

ACID ETCHED; BONE CONTACT; HISTOMORPHOMETRY; MACHINED IMPLANTS;

BONE;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; FRACTURE HEALING; IMPLANT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MORPHOMETRICS; NONHUMAN; RABBIT; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TIBIA;

ACIDS; ADMINISTRATION, TOPICAL; ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BONE SCREWS; INTERNAL FIXATORS; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; RABBITS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIBIA; TITANIUM;

EID: 33745016770     PISSN: 10506934     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Tissue integrated prosthesis. In: Osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence; 1985.
2. Brunette DM. Topography on the Behavior of Cells. The effects of implant surface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1988;3:231-46.
3. Rich A, Harris AK. Anomalous preferences of cultured macrophages for hydrophobic and roughened substrata. J Cell Sci. 1981;50:1-7.
4. Salthouse TN. Some aspects of macrophage behaviour at the implant interface. J Biomed Mater Res. 1984; 18:395-401.
5. Göthlin G, Ericsson JLE. On the histogenesis of the cells in fracture callus. Virchows Arch Cell Pathol. 1973;12:318-29.
6. Rovensky YA, Slavnaja IL, Vasiliev JM. Behaviour of fibroblast-like cells on grooved surfaces. Exp Cell Res. 1971;65:193-201.
7. Hong HL, Brunette DM. Effect of cell shape on prokinase secretion by epithelial cells. J Cell Sci. 1987;87:259-67.
8. Folkman J, Moscona A. Role of cell shape in growth control. Nature. 1978;273:345-49.
9. Ben-Ze'ev A. Cell shape, the complex cellular networks, and gene expression. Cytoskeletal protein genes as a model system. In: Strohman RC, Wolf S, editors. Gene expression in muscle. New York: Plenum; 1985:pp. 23-53.
10. Piattelli A, Piattelli M, Romasco N, Trisi P. Histochemical and laser scanning microscopy characterization of the hydroxyapatite-bone interface: an experimental study in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994;9:163-68.
11. Thomas KA, Cook S. An evaluation of variables influencing implant fixation by direct bone apposition. J Biomed Mater Res. 1985;19:875-901.
12. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res. 1991;25:889-902.
13. Martin JY, Schwartz Z, Hummert TW, Schraub DM, Simpson J, Cochran DL. Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells. J Biomed Mater Res. 1995;29:389-401.
14. Kirsch A, Donath K. Experimental research for the meaning of micromorphology of titan-implant surfaces. Advances in the field of dental implantology (Tierexperimentelle untersuchungen zur bedeutung der mikromorphologie von titanimplantato-berflachen. Fortschritte der Zahnarztlichen Implantologie). 1984;1:35-40.
15. Klokkevold PR, Nishimura RD, Adachi M, Caputo A. Osseointegration enhanced by chemical etching of titanium surface. A torque removal study in the rabbits. Clin Oral Implant Res. 1997;8(6):442-7.
16. Buser D, Nydegger T, Hirt HP, Cochran DL, Nolte LP. Removal torque values of titanium implants in the miniature pigs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;13(5):611-9.
17. Cordioli G, Majzoub Z, Piattelli A, Scarano A. Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of different titanium surfaces: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15(5):669-74.
18. Piattelli A, Cordioli GP, Trisi P, Passi P, Favero GA, Meffert RM. Light and confocal laser scanning microscopic evaluation of hydroxyapatite resorption patterns in medullary and cortical bone. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants. 1993;8:309-15.
19. Abrahamsson I, Zitzmann NU, Berglundh T, Wennerberg A, Lindhe J Bone and soft tissue integration to titanium implants with different surface topography: an experimental study in the dog. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001;16(3):323-32.
20. Massaro C, Rotolo P, De Riccardis F, Milella E, Napoli A, Wieland M, Textor M, Spencer ND, Brunette DM Comparative investigation of the surface properties of commercial titanium dental implants. Part I: Chemical composition. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2002;13(6):535-48.
21. Mazor Z, Cohen DK Preliminary 3-dimensional surface texture measurement and early loading results with a microtextured implant surface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18(5):729-38.
22. Gottlander M, Albrektsson T: Histomorphometric studies of hydrxyapatite-coated and uncoated CP titanium threaded implants in bone. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants. 1991;6:399-404.
23. Wennerberg A, Ektessabi A, Albrektsson R, Johansson C: 1 Year follow up of differing surface roughness placed in rabbit bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:486-94.
24. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B: Bone tissue response to commercially pure titanium implants blasted with fine and coarse particles of aluminum oxide. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants. 1996;11:38-45.
25. Carlsson L, Rostiund T, Albrektsson B, Albrektsson T. Removal torques for polished and rough titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1988;3:21-24.
26. Brunette DM, Ratkay J, Chehroudi B. Behavior of osteoblasts on micromachined surfaces. In: The bone-biomaterial interface. Davies JE, editor. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 1991. p. 170-80.