Temporal aspects of stereoscopic slant estimation: An evaluation and extension of Howard and Kaneko's theory

Vision Research

Volumn 38, Issue 24, 1998, Pages 3871-3882

  Van Ee, Raymond ^a   Erkelens, Casper J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Binocular disparity; Human slant perception; Stereopsis; Vision

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROTATION; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MATHEMATICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; ROTATION; TIME FACTORS; VISION DISPARITY;

EID: 0031782196     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00445-8     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Howard IP, Kaneko H. Relative shear disparities and the perception of surface inclination. Vision Res 1994;34:2505-17.
2. Kaneko H, Howard IP. Relative size disparities and the perception of surface slant. Vision Res 1996;13:1919-30.
3. Kaneko H, Howard IP. Spatial properties of shear disparity processing. Vision Res 1997:315-323.
4. Koenderink JJ, van Doom AJ. Geometry of binocular vision and a model for stereopsis. Biol Cybern 1976;21:29-35.
5. Ogle KN. Researches in Binocular Vision. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1950.
6. Stevens KA. Slant-tilt: the visual encoding of surface orientation. Biol Cybern 1983;46:183-95.
7. Gillam B, Rogers BJ. Orientation disparity, deformation and stereoscopic slant perception. Perception 1991;20:441-8.
8. van Ee R, Erkelens CJ. Slant perception in relation to the geometry of binocular vision: effects of local and global disparity fields. International Conference and Nato Advanced Workshop on Binocular Stereopsis and Optic Flow, Toronto, Canada, 1993.
9. Stenton SP, Frisby JP, Mayhew JEW. Vertical disparity pooling and the induced effect. Nature 1984;309:622-3.
10. Rogers BJ, Koenderink JJ. Monocular aniseikonia: a motion parallax analogue of the disparity-induced effect. Nature 1986;322:62-3.
11. van Ee R, Erkelens CJ. Temporal aspects of binocular slant perception. Vision Res 1996;36:43-51.
12. Howard IP, Zacher JE. Human cyclovergence as a function of stimulus frequency and amplitude. Exp Brain Res 1991;85:445-50.
13. Cagenello R, Rogers BJ. Orientation disparity, cyclotorsion, and the perception of surface slant. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci 1990;31:S97.
14. Rogers BJ. The perception and representation of depth and slant in stereoscopic surfaces. In: Orban G, Nagel H, editors. Artificial and Biological Vision Systems. Berlin: Springer, 1992:241-66.
15. van Ee R, Erkelens CJ. Binocular perception of slant about oblique axes relative to a visual frame of reference. Perception 1995;24:299-314.
16. Gillam B, Chambers D, Lawergren B. The role of vertical disparity in the scaling of stereoscopic depth perception: an empirical and theoretical study. Percept Psychophys 1988;44:473-83.
17. Backus BT, Banks MS. Slant-cue conflicts explain why the induced effect does not scale with distance. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci 1997;38:S904.
18. Collewijn H, van der Steen J, van Rijn LJ. Binocular eye movements and depth perception. In: Gorea A, editor. Representations of vision, trends and tacit assumptions in vision research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991:165-83.
19. Swash S, Rogers BJ, Bradshaw MF, Cagenello RB. The role of cyclovergence in the perceived slant of stereoscopic images related by vertical shear, rotation and deformation. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci 1995;36:S368.
20. van Ee R, Erkelens CJ. Binocular slant perception from scale, shear, rotation and divergence. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci 1996;37:S289.
21. Gillam B, Chambers D, Russo B. Postfusional latency in stereoscopic slant perception and the primitives of stereopsis. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform 1988;14:163-75.
22. van Ee R, Backus BT, Erkelens CJ. Perceptual learning in stereoscopic slant estimation. Internal Report of the Helmholtz Institute, UU-PA-pmi-088, 1996.
23. Gillam B, Flagg T, Finlay D. Evidence for disparity change as the primary stimulus for stereoscopic processing. Percept Psychophys 1984;36:559-64.
24. van Ee R, Erkelens CJ. The stability of stereoscopic depth perception with moving head and eyes. Vision Res 1996;36:3827-42.
25. Ryan C, Gillam B. Cue conflict and stereoscopic surface slant about horizontal and vertical axes. Perception 1994;23:645-58.
26. Erkelens CJ, van Ee R. Are stereopsis and ocular vergence based on head related disparity. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci 1997;38:S955.
27. Gillam B, Lawergren B. The induced effect, vertical disparity, and stereoscopic theory. Percept Psychophys 1983;34:121-30.