Relative size disparities and the perception of surface slant

Vision Research

Volumn 36, Issue 13, 1996, Pages 1919-1930

  Kaneko, Hirohiko ^a,b   Howard, Ian P ^a  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b ADVANCED TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH INSTITUTE INTERNATIONAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Perceived slant; Stereopsis; The induced effect; Vertical disparity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0029897158     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00258-8     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Arditi, A. (1982). The dependence of the induced effect on orientation and a hypothesis concerning disparity computation in general. Vision Research, 22, 247-256.
2. Arditi, A., Kaufman, L. & Movshon, J. A. (1981). A simple explanation of the induced size effect. Vision Research, 21, 755-764.
3. Cumming, B. G., Johnston, E. B. & Parker, A. J. (1991). Vertical disparities and perception of three-dimensional shape. Nature, 349, 411-413.
4. Friedman, R. B., Kaye, M. G. & Richards, W. (1978) Effect of vertical disparity upon stereoscopic depth. Vision Research, 18, 351-352.
5. Frisby, J. P. (1984). An old illusion and a new theory of stereoscopic depth perception. Nature, 307, 592-593.
6. Gillam, B., Chambers, D. & Lawergren, B. (1988a). The role of vertical disparity in the scaling of stereoscopic depth perception: An empirical and theoretical study. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 477-488.
7. Gillam, B., Chambers, D. & Russo, T. (1988b). Postfusional latency in slant perception and the primitives of stereopsis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 163-175.
8. Gillam, B., Flagg, T. & Finlay, D. (1984). Evidence for disparity change as the primary stimulus for stereoscopic processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 559-564.
9. Gillam, B. & Lawergren, B. (1983). The induced effect, vertical disparity and stereoscopic theory. Perception & Psychophysics, 34, 121-130.
10. Gillam, B. & Rogers, B. (1991). Orientation disparity, deformation, and stereoscopic slant perception. Perception, 20, 441-446.
11. Householder, A. S. A. (1943). A theory of the induced size effect. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 5, 155-160.
12. Howard, I. P. & Kaneko, H. (1994). Relative shear disparities and the perception of surface inclination. Vision Research, 34, 2505-2517.
13. Julesz, B. (1964). Binocular depth perception without familiarity cues. Science, 145, 356-362.
14. Kaneko, H. & Howard, I. P. (1994). Reference to scale horizontal shear disparity for the perception of surface inclination. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 35, 2110.
15. Koenderink, J. J. & van Doom, A. J. (1976). Geometry of binocular vision and a model for stereopsis. Biological Cybernetics, 21, 29-35.
16. Lippincott, J. A. (1889). On the binocular metamorphopsia produced by correcting glasses. AMA Archives of Ophthalmology, 18, 18-30.
17. Longuet-Higgins, H. C. (1982). The role of the vertical dimension in stereoscopic vision. Perception, 11, 377-386.
18. Marran, L. & Schor, C. M. (1994). Retinal and extraretinal cues to nonconjugate accommodation. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 35, 1736.
19. Mayhew, J. E. W. & Frisby, J. P. (1982). The induced effect: Arguments against the theory of Arditi, Kaufman & Movshon. Vision Research, 22, 1225-1228.
20. Mayhew, J. E. W. & Longuet-Higgins, H. C. (1982). A computational model of binocular depth perception. Nature, 297, 376-378.
21. Ogle, K. N. (1938). Induced size effect. I: A new phenomenon in binocular vision associated with the relative sizes of the images in the two eyes. AMA Archives of Ophthalmology, 20, 604-623.
22. Ogle, K. N. (1939). Induced size effect. II: An experimental study of the phenomenon with restricted fusion contours. AMA Archives of Ophthalmology, 21, 604-625.
23. Ogle, K. N. (1964). Researches in binocular vision. New York: Hafner.
24. O'Shea, R. P. & Crassini, B. (1982). The dependence of cyclofusion on orientation. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 195-196.
25. Petrov, A. P. (1980). A geometrical explanation of the induced effect. Vision Research, 20, 407-413.
26. Rogers, B. J. & Bradshaw, M. F. (1993). Vertical disparity, differential perspective and binocular stereopsis. Nature, 361, 253-255.
27. Rogers, B. J. & Bradshaw, M. F. (1996). Disparity scaling and the perception of front-parallel surfaces. Perception. In press.
28. Rogers B. J. & Koenderink, (1986). Monocular aniseikonia: A motion parallax analogue of the disparity-induced effect. Nature, 322, 62-63.
29. Sobel, E. C. & Collett, T. S. (1991). Does vertical disparity scale the perception of stereoscopic depth? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 244, 87-90.
30. Stenton, S. P., Frisby, J. P. & Mayhew, J. E. W. (1984). Vertical disparity pooling and the induced effect. Nature, 309, 622-623.
31. Westheimer, G. (1978). Vertical disparity detection: Is there an induced size effect? Investigative Ophthalmology, 17, 545-551.