Interplay of meaning, syntax and working memory during pronoun resolution investigated by ERPs

Brain Research

Volumn 1230, Issue , 2008, Pages 177-191

  Hammer, Anke ^a   Jansma, Bernadette M ^b   Lamers, Monique ^c   Münte, Thomas F ^a  

^a OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Event related potential (ERP); Language; Meaning; N400; P600; Pronoun processing; Syntax; Working memory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; LINGUISTICS; NEUROIMAGING; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTIC MEMORY; SEMANTICS; WORKING MEMORY;

EID: 54049145848     PISSN: 00068993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.004     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Baayen, R.H., Piepenbrock, R., Van Rijen, H., 1995. The Celex lexical database (CD-ROM). University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia.
2. Barcelo, F., Escera, C., Corral, M.J., Perianez, J.A., 2006. Task switching and novelty processing activate a common neural network for cognitive control. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 18, 1734-1748.
3. Bonte, M., Parviainen, T., Hytonen, K., Salmelin, R., 2006. Time course of top-down and bottom-up influences on syllable processing in the auditory cortex. Cereb. Cortex 16, 115-123.
4. Bornkessel, I., Schlesewsky, M., 2006. The extended argument dependency model: a neurocognitive approach to sentence comprehension across languages. Psychol. Rev. 113, 787-821.
5. Bornkessel, I., Schlesewsky, M., in press. An alternative perspective on "semantic P600" effects in language comprehension. Brain Res. (Electronic publication ahead of print). doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2008.05.003.
6. Carpenter, P.A., Miyake, A., Just, M.A., 1995. Language comprehension: sentence and discourse processing. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 46, 91-120.
7. Clark, H.H., Sengul, C.J., 1979. In search of referents for nouns and pronouns. Mem. & Cog. 3, 35-41.
8. Coulson, S., King, J.W., Kutas, M., 1998. ERPs and domain specificity: beating a straw horse. Lang. Cogn. Processes 13, 653-672.
9. Ferreira, F., Clifton, C., 1986. The independence of syntactic processing. J. Mem. Lang. 25, 348-368.
10. Fiebach, C.J., Schlesewsky, M., Friederici, A.D., 2001. Syntactic working memory and the establishment of filler-gap dependencies: insights from ERPs and fMRI. J. Psycholinguist Res. 30, 321-338.
11. Frauenfelder, U.H., Tyler, L.K., 1987. The process of spoken word recognition: an introduction. Cognition 25, 1-20.
12. Frazier, L., Fodor, J.D., 1978. The sausage machine: a new two-stage parsing model. Cognition 6, 291-325.
13. Friederici, A.D., 2002. Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6, 78-84.
14. Friederici, A.D., Pfeifer, E., Hahne, A., 1993. Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain. Res. 1, 183-192.
15. Friederici, A.D., Steinhauer, K., Frisch, S., 1999. Lexical integration: sequential effects of syntactic and semantic information. Mem. Cognit. 27, 438-453.
16. Garrod, S.C., Sanford, A.J., 1994. Resolvong sentences in a discourse context. In: Gernsbacher, M.A. (Ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Academic Press, New York, pp. 675-698.
17. Garrod, S.C., Terras, M., 2000. The contribution of lexical and situational knowledge to resolving discourse roles: bonding and resolution. J. Mem. Lang. 42, 526-544.
18. Gernsbacher, M.A., 1991. Comprehending conceptual anaphors. Lang. Cogn. Processes 6, 81-105.
19. Gordon, P.C., Hendrick, R., 1998. The representation and processing of coreference in discourse. Cogn. Sci. 22, 389-424.
20. Graesser, A.C., Millis, K.K., Zwaan, R.A., 1997. Discourse comprehension. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 48, 163-189.
21. Grodzinsky, Y., Friederici, A.D., 2006. Neuroimaging of syntax and syntactic processing. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 16, 240-246.
22. Gruber, O., Karch, S., Schlueter, E.K., Falkai, P., Goschke, T., 2006. Neural mechanisms of advance preparation in task switching. NeuroImage 31, 887-895.
23. Gunter, T.C., Stowe, L.A., Mulder, G., 1997. When syntax meets semantics. Psychophysiology 34, 660-676.
24. Hagoort, P., 2003. How the brain solves the binding problem for language: a neurocomputational model of syntactic processing. NeuroImage 20 (Suppl 1), S18-29.
25. Hagoort, P., 2005. On Broca, brain, and binding: a new framework. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9, 416-423.
26. Hagoort, P., Brown, C.M., Groothusen, J., 1993. The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Lang. Cogn. Proc. 8, 439-483.
27. Hagoort, P., Brown, C.M., Osterhout, L., 1999. The neurocognition of syntactic processing. In: Brown, C.M., Hagoort, P. (Eds.), The Neurocognition of Language. University Press, Oxford, pp. 273-316.
28. Hahne, A., Friederici, A.D., 1999. Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis. Early automatic and late controlled processes. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 11, 194-205.
29. Hammer, A., Jansma, B.M., Lamers, M., Münte, T.F., 2005. Pronominal reference in sentences about persons or things: an electrophysiological approach. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 227-239.
30. Hankamer, J., Sag, I., 1976. Deep and surface anaphora. Linguist. Inq. 7, 391-426.
31. Kaan, E., Harris, A., Gibson, E., Holcomb, P.J., 2000. The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Lang. Cogn. Proc. 15, 159-201.
32. Kaan, E., Swaab, T.Y., 2003. Repair, revision, and complexity in syntactic analysis: an electrophysiological differentiation. J. Cogn Neurosci. 15, 98-110.
33. Kluender, R., Kutas, M., 1993. Bridging the gap: Evidence from ERPs on the processing of unbounded dependencies. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 5, 196-214.
34. Kolk, H.H., Chwilla, D.J., van Herten, M., Oor, P.J., 2003. Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: a study with event-related potentials. Brain Lang. 85, 1-36.
35. Kuperberg, G.R., 2007. Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: challenges to syntax. Brain Res. 1146, 23-49.
36. Kuperberg, G.R., Holcomb, P.J., Sitnikova, T., Greve, D., Dale, A.M., Caplan, D., 2003. Distinct patterns of neural modulation during the processing of conceptual and syntactic anomalies. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 15, 272-293.
37. Kutas, M., Hillyard, S.A., 1980. Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science 207, 203-205.
38. Kutas, M., Hillyard, S.A., 1983. Event-related brain potentials to grammatical errors and semantic anomalies. Mem. Cognit. 11, 539-550.
39. Lamers, M.J., Jansma, B.M., Hammer, A., Munte, T.F., 2006. Neural correlates of semantic and syntactic processes in the comprehension of case marked pronouns: evidence from German and Dutch. BMC Neurosci. 7, 23.
40. MacDonald, M.C., MacWhinney, B., 1990. Measuring inhibition and facilitation from pronouns. J. Mem. Lang. 29, 469-492.
41. Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L.K., 1980. The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition 8, 1-71.
42. Mestres-Misse, A., Rodriguez-Fornells, A., Munte, T.F., 2006. Watching the brain during meaning acquisition. Cereb. Cortex.
43. Münte, T.F., Heinze, H.J., Matzke, M., Wieringa, B.M., Johannes, S., 1998a. Brain potentials and syntactic violations revisited: no evidence for specificity of the syntactic positive shift. Neuropsychologia 36, 217-226.
44. Münte, T.F., Schiltz, K., Kutas, M., 1998b. When temporal terms belie conceptual order. Nature 395, 71-73.
45. Münte, T.F., Wieringa, B.M., Weyerts, H., Szentkuti, A., Matzke, M., Johannes, S., 2001. Differences in brain potentials to open and closed class words: class and frequency effects. Neuropsychologia 39, 91-102.
46. Neville, H., Nicol, J., Barss, A., Forster, K., Garrett, M., 1991. Syntactically based sentences processing classes: Evidence from event-related potentials. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 3.
47. Nicol, J., Swinney, D., 1989. The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension. J. Psycholinguist Res. 18, 5-19.
48. Osterhout, L., Bersick, M., McKinnon, R., 1997. Brain potentials elicited by words: word length and frequency predict the latency of an early negativity. Biol. Psychol. 46, 143-168.
49. Osterhout, L., Holcomb, P.J., 1992. Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. J. Mem. Lang. 34, 785-806.
50. Osterhout, L., Holcomb, P.J., Swinney, D.A., 1994. Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn Mem. Cogn. 20, 786-803.
51. Osterhout, L., Kim, A., Kuperberg, G., in press The neurobiology of sentence comprehension. In: M. Spivey, M. J., K. McRae (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
52. Osterhout, L., Mobley, P.J., 1995. Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree. J. Mem. Lang. 34, 785-806.
53. Philipp, A.M., Jolicoeur, P., Falkenstein, M., Koch, I., 2007. Response selection and response execution in task switching: evidence from a go-signal paradigm. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn Mem. Cogn. 33, 1062-1075.
54. Rösler, F., Pechmann, T., Streb, J., Hennighausen, E., 1998. Parsing of sentences in a language with varying word order: word-by-word variations of processing demands are revealed by event-related brain potentials. J. Mem. Lang. 38, 15-176.
55. Schmitt, B.M., Lamers, M., Munte, T.F., 2002. Electrophysiological estimates of biological and syntactic gender violation during pronoun processing. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 14, 333-346.
56. Sridhar, 1988. Cognition and Sentence Production: A Cross-linguistic Study. Springer Verlag, New York Berlin.
57. Streb, J., Hennighausen, E., Rosler, F., 2004. Different anaphoric expressions are investigated by event-related brain potentials. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 33, 175-201.
58. Streb, J., Rosler, F., Hennighausen, E., 1999. Event-related responses to pronoun and proper name anaphors in parallel and nonparallel discourse structures. Brain Lang. 70, 273-286.
59. Trueswell, J.C., Tanenhaus, M.K., 1994. Toward a lexicalist framework for constraint-based syntactic ambiguity resolution In: Clifton, C., et al. (Ed.), Perspectives on Sentence Processing. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 155-179.
60. van Berkum, J.J., Brown, C.M., Hagoort, P., Zwitserlood, P., 2003. Event-related brain potentials reflect discourse-referential ambiguity in spoken language comprehension. Psychophysiology 40, 235-248.
61. van Berkum, J.J., Hagoort, P., Brown, C.M., 1999. Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: evidence from the N400. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 11, 657-671.
62. Van Petten, C., Kutas, M., 1990. Interactions between sentence context and word frequency in event-related brain potentials. Mem. Cognit. 18, 380-393.
63. Vosse, T., Kempen, G., 2000. Syntactic structure assembly in human parsing: a computational model based on competitive inhibition and a lexicalist grammar. Cognition 75, 105-143.
64. Wylie, G., Allport, A., 2000. Task switching and the measurement of "switch costs". Psychol. Res. 63, 212-233.