Lexical integration: Sequential effects of syntactic and semantic information

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 438-453

  Friederici, Angela D ^a   Steinhauer, Karsten ^a   Frisch, Stefan ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ELECTROOCULOGRAPHY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTEGRATION; MALE; READING; SEMANTICS; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 0032913011     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03211539     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. AINSWORTH-DARNELL, K., SHULMAN, H. G., & BOLAND, J. E. (1998). Dissociating brain responses to syntactic and semantic anomalies: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Memory & Language, 38, 112-130.
2. ANDERSON, J. R. (1983). The architecture oF cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. BECKER, C. A. (1980). Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies. Memory & Cognition, 8, 493-512.
4. BECKER, C. A. (1985). What do we really know about semantic context effects during reading? In D. Besner, T. G. Waller, & E. M. McKinnon (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 5, pp. 125-169). Toronto: Academic Press.
5. BENTIN, S., MCCARTHY, G., & WOOD, C. C. (1985). Event-related potentials associated with semantic priming. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 60, 343-355.
6. BOLAND, J. E., TANENHAUS, M. K., GARNSEY, S. M., & CARLSON, G. N. (1995). Verb argument structure in parsing and interpretation: Evidence from wh-questions. Journal of Memory & Language, 34, 774-806.
7. BROWN, C. M., & HAGOORT, P. (1993). The processing nature of the N400: Evidence from masked priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 34-44.
8. BURNAGE, G. (1990). CELEX: A guide for users. Nijmegen: SSN.
9. CHWILLA, D. J., BROWN, C. M., & HAGOORT, P. (1995). The N400 as a function of the level of processing. Psychophysiology, 32, 274-285.
10. COLLINS, A. M., & LOFTUS, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407-428.
11. COULSON, S., KING, J., & KUTAS, M. (1998). Expect the unexpected: Event-related brain response to morphosyntactic violations. Language & Cognitive Processes, 13, 21-58.
12. COWART, W. (1982). Autonomy and interaction in the language processing system: A reply to Marslen-Wilson and Tyler. Cognition, 12, 109-117.
13. DEUTSCH, A., & BENTIN, S. (1994). Attention mechanisms mediate the syntactic priming effect in auditory word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 595-607.
14. ELMAN, J. L., & McCLELLAND, J. L. (1984). Speech as a cognitive process: The interactive activation model. In N. Lass (Ed.), Speech and language (Vol. 10, pp. 337-374). New York: Academic Press.
15. Foss, D. J., & SPEER, S. R. (1991). Global and local context effects in sentence processing. In R. R. Hoffman & D. S. Palermo (Eds.), Cognition and the symbolic processes: Applied and ecological perspectives (pp. 115-139). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. FRAUENFELDER, U. H., & TYLER, L. K. (1987). The process of spoken word recognition: An introduction. Cognition, 25, 1-20.
17. FRAZIER, L. (1987). Structure in auditory word recognition. Cognition, 25, 157-187.
18. FRAZIER, L., & RAYNER, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 178-210.
19. FRIEDERICI, A. D. (1985). Levels of processing and vocabulary types: Evidence from on-line comprehension in normals and agrammatics. Cognition, 19, 133-166.
20. FRIEDERICI, A. D. (1995). The time course of syntactic activation during language processing: A model based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data. Brain & Language, 50, 259-281.
21. FRIEDERICI, A. D., HAHNE, A., & MECKLINGER, A. (1996). The temporal structure of syntactic parsing: Early and late ERP effects elicited by syntactic anomalies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 1-31.
22. FRIEDERICI, A. D., & KILBORN, K. (1989). Temporal constraints on language processing: Syntactic priming in Broca's aphasia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 262-272.
23. FRIEDERICI, A. D., & MECKLINGER, A. (1996). Syntactic parsing as revealed by brain responses: First-pass and second-pass parsing processes. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 157-176.
24. FRIEDERICI, A. D., PFEIFER, E., & HAHNE, A. (1993). Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: Effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations. Cognitive Brain Research, 1, 183-192.
25. FRIEDERICI, A. D., & SADDY, D. (1993). Disorders of word class processing in aphasia. In G. Blanken, J. Dittmann, H. Grimm, J. C. Marshall, & C. W. Wallesch (Eds.), Linguistic disorders and pathologies (pp. 169-181). Berlin: De Gruyter.
26. FRISCH, S., & FRIEDERICI, A. D. (1998). Verb-argument structure processing: The influence of verb-specific and argument-specific constraints. Poster presented at the Eleventh Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New Brunswick, NJ.
27. GORRELL, P. (1995). Syntax and parsing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. GUNTER, T. C., STOWE, L. A., & MULDER, G. (1997). When syntax meets semantics. Psychophysiology, 34, 660-676.
29. HAGOORT, P., BROWN, C., & GROOTHUSEN, J. ( 1993). The syntactic positive shift as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language & Cognitive Processes, 8, 439-483.
30. HAHNE, A., & FRIEDERICI, A. D. (1999). Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis: Early automatic and late controlled processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 193-204.
31. HALGREN, E., & SMITH, M. E. (1987). Cognitive evoked potentials as modulatory processes in human memory formation and retrieval. Human Neurobiology, 6, 129-139.
32. HOLCOMB, P. J., & NEVILLE, H. (1990). Auditory and visual semantic priming in lexical decision: A comparison using event-related brain potentials. Language & Cognitive Processes, 5, 281 -312.
33. HOPF, J. M., BAYER, J., BADER, M., &MENG, M. (1998). Event-related brain potentials and case information in syntactic ambiguities. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 264-280.
34. HUYNH, H., & FELDT, L. A. ( 1970). Conditions under which square ratios in repeated measurement designs have exact F-distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65, 1582-1589.
35. KUTAS, M. (1997). Views on how the electrical activity that the brain generates reflects the functions of different language structures. Psychophysiology, 34, 383-398.
36. KUTAS, M., & HILLYARD, ST. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203-205.
37. KUTAS, M., & HILLYARD, ST. A. (1984). Brain potentials during read-ing reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307, 161-163.
38. KUTAS, M., LINDAMOOD, T. E., & HILLYARD, ST.A. (1984). Word expectancy and event-related brain potentials during sentence processing. In S. Kornblum & J. Requin (Eds.), Preparatory states and processes (pp. 217-238). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. KUTAS, M., & VAN PETTEN, C. (1988). Event-related potential studies of language. In P K. Acides, J. R. Jennings, & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.), Advances in psychophysiology (Vol. 3, pp. 139-187). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
40. LEVELT, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. MARSLEN-WILSON, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition. Cognition, 25, 71-102.
42. MARSLEN-WILSON, W. D. (1989). Access and integration: Projecting sound onto meaning. In W. D. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and process (Vol. 1, pp. 3-24). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43. MARSLEN-WILSON, W. D., & TYLER, L. K. (1980). The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition, 8, 1-71.
44. MCCARTHY, G., & WOOD, C. C. (1985). Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: An ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 62, 203-208.
45. MCCLELLAND, J. L., & RUMELHART, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
46. McKINNON, R., & OSTERHOUT, L. (1996). Constraints on movement phenomena in sentence processing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Language & Cognitive Processes, 11, 495-523.
47. MECKLINGER, A., SCHRIEFERS, H., STEINHAUER, K., & FRIEDERICI, A. D. (1995). Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: An analysis with event-related potentials. Memory & Cognition, 23, 477-494.
48. MEYER, D. M., & SCHVANEVELDT, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 227-234.
49. MITCHELL, D. C. (1989). Verb-guidance and other lexical effects in parsing. Language & Cognitive Processes, 4, 123-154.
50. M̈UNTE, T. F., HEINZE, H.-J., & MANGUN, G. R. (1993). Dissociation of brain activity related to syntactic and semantic aspects of language. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 335-344.
51. MüHTE, T. F., MATZKE, M., & JOHANNES, S. (1997). Brain activity associated with syntactic incongruencies in words and pseudo-words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 318-329.
52. NEELY, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264-336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
53. NEELY, J. H., & KEEFE, D. H. (1989). Semantic context effects on visual word processing: A hybrid prospective/retrospective processing theory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 24, pp. 207-248). New York: Academic Press.
54. NEVILLE, H.-J., MILLS, D. L., & LAWSON, D. L. (1992). Fractionating language: Different neural subsystems with different sensitive periods. Cerebral Cortex, 2, 244-258.
55. NEVILLE, H.-J., NICOL, J. L., BARSS, A., FORSTER, K. I., & GARRETT, M. F. (1991). Syntactically based sentence processing classes: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 155-170.
56. NOBRE, A. C., & MCCARTHY, G. (1994). Language-related ERPs: Scalp distributions and modulations by word type and semantic priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 233-255.
57. NORRIS, D. (1986). Word recognition. Cognition, 22, 93-136.
58. O'GRADY, W., DOBROVOLSKY, M., & ARONOFF, M. (1989). Contemporary linguistics. New York: St. Martin's Press.
59. OLDFIELD, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
60. O'SEAOHDHA, P. G. (1989). The dependence of lexical relatedness effects on syntactic connectedness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 73-87.
61. O'SEAGHDHA, P. G. (1997). Conjoint and dissociable effects of syntac-tic and semantic context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 807-828.
62. OSTERHOUT, L., & HOLCOMB, P. J. (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory & Language, 31, 785-804.
63. OSTERHOUT, L., HOLCOMB, P. J., & SWINNEY, D. A. (1994). Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: Evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 786-803.
64. OSTERHOUT, L., & MOBLEY, L. A. (1995). Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree. Journal of Memory &Language, 34, 739-773.
65. POSNER, M. I., & SNYDER, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 55-85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
66. RATCLIFF, R., & McKooN, G. (1988). A retrieval theory of priming in memory. Psychological Review, 95, 385-408.
67. RAYNER, K., CARLSON, M., & FRAZIER, L. (1983). The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: Eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 22, 358-374.
68. RAYNER, K., & FRAZIER, L. (1987). Parsing temporarily ambiguous complements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 657-673.
69. RÖSLER, F., FRIEDERICI, A. D., PüTZ, P., & HAHNE, A. (1993). Event-related brain potentials while encountering semantic and syntactic constraint violations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 345-362.
70. RUGG, M. D. (1990). Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetition effects of high-and low-frequency words. Memory & Cognition, 18, 367-379.
71. SCHRIEFERS, H., FRIEDERICI, A. D., & ROSE, U. (1998). Context effects in visual word recognition: Lexical relatedness and syntactic context. Memory &Cognition, 26, 1292-1303.
72. SEIDENBERG, M. S., WATERS, G. S., SANDERS, M.. &LANGER, P. ( 1984). Pre-and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 12, 315-328.
73. STANOVICH, K. E., & WEST, R. F. ( 1983). On priming by a sentence context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 1-36.
74. SWINNEY, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 18, 645-659.
75. TANENHAUS, M. K., CARLSON, G. N., &SEIDENBERG, M. S. (1985). Do listeners compute linguistic representations? In D. Dowty, L. Kartunnen, & A. Zwicky (Eds.), Natural language parsing: Psychological, theoretical, and computational perspectives (pp. 359-408). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
76. TANENHAUS, M. K., CARLSON, G. N., & TRUESWELL, J. C. (1989). The role of thematic structures in interpretation and parsing. Language & Cognitive Processes, 4, 211 -234.
77. TRUESWELL, J. C., TANENHAUS, M. K., & KELLO, C. (1993). Verbspecific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 528-553.
78. VAN PETTEN, C. (1993). A comparison of lexical and sentence-level context effects in event-related potentials. Language & Cognitive Processes, 8, 485-531.
79. VAN PETTEN, C., & KUTAS, M. (1990). Interactions between sentence context and word frequency in event-related brain potentials. Memory & Cognition, 18, 380-393.
80. VAN PETTEN, C. ,& KUTAS, M. (1991). Influences of semantic and syntactic context on open-closed-class words. Memory & Cognition. 19, 95-112.
81. WEST, R. F., & STANOVICH, K. E. (1986). Robust effects of syntactic structure on visual word processing. Memory & Cognition, 14, 104-112.
82. WRIGHT, B., & GARRETT, M. (1984). Lexical decision in sentences: Effects of syntactic structure. Memory & Cognition, 12, 31-45.
83. ZWITSERLOOD, P. (1989). The locus of the effects of sentential-semantic context in spoken-word processing. Cognition, 32, 25-64.