Diagnostic performance of detecting breast cancer on computed radiographic (CR) mammograms: Comparison of hard copy film, 3-megapixel liquid-crystal-display (LCD) monitor and 5-megapixel LCD monitor

European Radiology

Volumn 18, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 2363-2369

  Yamada, Takayuki ^a   Suzuki, Akihiko ^a   Uchiyama, Nachiko ^b   Ohuchi, Noriaki ^a   Takahashi, Shoki ^a  

^a TOHOKU UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL CANCER CENTER   (Japan)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasm; Data display; Digital radiography; Liquid crystals; ROC curve

Indexed keywords

3 MEGAPIXEL LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY; 5 MEGAPIXEL LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY; ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FILM; HARD COPY FILM; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; SOFT COPY FILM;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMPUTER TERMINALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; X-RAY FILM;

EID: 54049098447     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-1016-8     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Fischer U, Baum F, Obenauer S et al (2002) Comparative study in patients with microcalcifications: Full-field digital mammography vs screen-film mammography. Eur Radiol 12:2679-2683
2. Obenauer S, Luftner-Nagel S, von Heyden D, Munzel U, Baum F, Grabbe E (2002) Screen film vs full-field digital mammography: Image quality, detectability and characterization of lesion. Eur Radiol 12:1697-1702
3. Lewin JM, D'Orsi CJ, Hendrick RE et al (2002) Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol 179:671-677
4. Lewin JM, Hendrick RE, D'Orsi CJ et al (2001) Comparison of full-field digital mammography for cancer detection: Results of 4,945 paired examinations. Radiology 218:873-880
5. Skaane P, Young K, Skjennald A (2003) Population-based mammography screening: Comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading - Oslo I study. Radiology 229:877-884
6. Skaane P, Skjennald A (2004) Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: Randomized trial in a population-based screening program-The Oslo II study. Radiology 232:197-204
7. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E et al (2005) Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 353:1773-1783
8. Gitlin JN, Narayan AK, Mitchell CA et al (2007) A comparative study of conventional mammography film interpretations with soft copy readings of the same examinations. J Digit Imaging 20:42-52
9. Kim HS, Han B, Choo K, Jeon YH, Kim J, Choe Y (2005) Screen-Film mammography and soft-copy full-field digital mammography: Comparison in the patients with microcalcification. Korean J Radiol 6:214-220
10. Yang WT, Lai CJ, Whitman GJ et al (2006) Comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection and characterization of simulated small masses. Am J Roentgenol 187:W576-W581
11. Skaane P, Balleyguier C, Diekmann F et al (2005) Breast lesion detection and classification: Comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading- observer performance study. Radiology 237:37-44
12. Fishmann A, Siegmann KC, Wersebe A, Claussen CD, Muller-Schimpfle M (2005) Comparison of full-field digital mammography and film-screen mammography: Image quality and lesion detection. Br J Radiol 78:312-315
13. Krug KB, Stutzer H, Girnus R et al (2007) Image quality of digital direct flat-panel mammography versus an analog screen-film technique using a phantom model. Am J Roentgenol 188:399-407
14. Del Turco MR, Mantellini P, Ciatto S et al (2007) Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: Comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts. Am J Roentgenol 189:860-866
15. Pisano ED, Gatsonis CA, Yaffe MJ et al (2005) American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial: Objectives and methodology. Radiology 236:404-412
16. Bonardi R, Ambrogetti D, Ciatto S et al (2005) Conventional versus digital mammography in the analysis of screen-detected lesions with low positive predictive value. Eur J Radiol 55:258-263
17. Kamitani T, Yabuuchi H, Soeda H et al (2007) Detection of masses and microcalcifications of breast cancer on digital mammograms: Comparison among hard-copy film, 3-megapixel liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors and 5-megapixel LCD monitors: An observer performance study. Eur Radiol 17:1365-1371
18. Uematsu T, Kasami Y, Uchida Y (2007) Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of microcalcifications: Diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a clinical setting. Acta Radiol 48:714-720
19. Pisano ED, Cole EB, Kistner EO et al (2002) Interpretation of digital mammograms: Comparison of speed and accuracy of soft-copy versus printed-film display. Radiology 223:483-488
20. Obennauer S, Hermann KP, Martern K et al (2003) Soft copy versus hard copy reading in digital mammography. J Digit Imaging 16:341-344
21. Zuley ML, Willison KM, Bonaccio E et al (2006) Full-field digital mammography on LCD versus CRT monitors. Am J Roentgenol 187:1492-1498
22. Saunders RS, Samiel E, Backer J et al (2006) Comparison of LCD and CRT displays based on efficacy for digital mammography. Acad Radiol 13:1317-1326
23. Brennan PC, McEntee M, Evanoff M, Phillips P, O'Connor WT, Manning DJ (2007) Ambient lighting: Effects of illumination on soft-copy viewing of radiographs of the wirst. Am J Roentgenol 188:W177-W180