Comparison of LCD and CRT Displays Based on Efficacy for Digital Mammography

Academic Radiology

Volumn 13, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 1317-1326

  Saunders, Robert S ^a   Samei, Ehsan ^b   Baker, Jay ^a   Delong, David ^a   Soo, Mary Scott ^c   Walsh, Ruth ^c   Pisano, Etta ^d   Kuzmiak, Cherie M ^e   Pavic, Dag ^e  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

cathode ray tube; CRT; Digital mammography; LCD; liquid crystal display; observer performance; soft copy display

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST CANCER; BREAST EXAMINATION; BREAST TUMOR; CATHODE RAY OSCILLOSCOPE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CLINICAL OBSERVATION; DATA ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DIGITAL IMAGING; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RADIOLOGIST; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; CALCINOSIS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA DISPLAY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIQUID CRYSTALS; MAMMOGRAPHY; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RESEARCH DESIGN; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 33750285479     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2006.07.017     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Pisano E.D., Gatsonis C., Hendrick E., et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 353 (2005) 1773-1783
2. Saunders R.S., and Samei E. Resolution and noise measurements of five CRT and LCD medical displays. Med Phys 33 (2006) 308-319
3. Saunders Jr. R.S., Samei E., Jesneck J.L., et al. Physical characterization of a prototype selenium-based full field digital mammography detector. Med Phys 32 (2005) 588-599
4. Fan J., Dallas W.J., Roehrig H., et al. Improving visualization of digital mammograms on the CRT display system. Proc SPIE 5029 (2003) 746-753
5. Mertelmeier T. Why and how is soft copy reading possible in clinical practice?. J Dig Imaging 12 (1999) 3-11
6. Muka E., Blume H.R., and Daly S.J. Display of medical images on CRT soft-copy displays: a tutorial. Proc SPIE 2431 (1995) 341-359
7. Compton K.D. Factors affecting CRT display performance: specifying what works. Proc SPIE 3976 (2000) 412-423
8. Samei E., and Flynn M.J. A method for in-field evaluation of the modulation transfer function of electronic display devices. Proc SPIE 4319 (2001) 599-607
9. Blume H.R., Steven P.M., Cobb M.E., et al. Characterization of high-resolution liquid crystal displays for medical images. Proc SPIE 4681 (2002) 271-292
10. Badano A., Gagne R.M., Jennings R.J., et al. Noise in flat-panel displays with subpixel structure. Med Phys 31 (2004) 715-723
11. Samei E., and Wright S.L. Luminance and contrast performance of liquid crystal displays for mammographic applications. Technol Cancer Res Treatment 3 (2004) 429-436
12. NEMA. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Part 14: grayscale display standard function (2000), National Electrical Manufacturers Association, Rosslyn, Va
13. Samei E., Badano A., Chakraborty D., et al. Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: executive summary of AAPM TG18 report. Med Phys 32 (2005) 1205-1225
14. Suryanarayanan S., Karellas A., and Vedantham S. Physical characteristics of a full-field digital mammography system. Nucl Instrum Methods 533 (2004) 560-570
15. Vedantham S., Karellas A., Suryanarayanan S., et al. Full breast digital mammography with an amorphous silicon-based flat panel detector: physical characteristics of a clinical prototype. Med Phys 27 (2000) 558-567
16. Saunders Jr. R.S., Samei E., and Baker J.A. Simulation of breast lesions (2004), 7th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, Durham, NC 162-169
17. Saunders R.S., and Samei E. Characterization of breast masses for simulation purposes. Proc SPIE 5372 (2004) 242-250
18. Saunders Jr. R.S., Samei E., Baker J.A., et al. Simulation of mammographic lesions. Acad Radiol 13 (2006) 860-870
19. Samei E., and Flynn M.J. An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems. Med Phys 30 (2003) 608-622
20. Boone J.M., Lindfors K.K., Cooper III V.N., et al. Scatter/primary in mammography: comprehensive results. Med Phys 27 (2000) 2408-2416
21. Stahl M., Aach T., and Dippel S. Digital radiography enhancement by nonlinear multiscale processing. Med Phys 27 (2000) 56-65
22. Davies A.G., Cowen A.R., Parkin G.J.S., et al. Optimizing the processing and presentation of PPCR imaging. Proc SPIE 2712 (1996) 189-195
23. Krupinski E.A., Johnson J., Roehrig H., et al. On-axis and off-axis viewing of images on CRT displays and LCDs: observer performance and vision model predictions. Acad Radiol 12 (2005) 957-964
24. Efron B., and Tibshirani R. An introduction to the bootstrap (1993), Chapman & Hall, New York
25. Heiberger R.M., and Holland B. Statistical analysis and data display: an intermediate course with examples in S-plus, R, and SAS (2004), Springer, New York
26. Hwang S.A., Seo J.B., Choi B.K., et al. Liquid-crystal display monitors and cathode-ray tube monitors: a comparison of observer performance in the detection of small solitary pulmonary nodules. Korean J Radiol 4 (2003) 153-156
27. Oschatz E., Prokop M., Scharitzer M., et al. Comparison of liquid crystal versus cathode ray tube display for the detection of simulated chest lesions. Eur Radiol 15 (2005) 1472-1476
28. Scharitzer M., Prokop M., Weber M., et al. Detectability of catheters on bedside chest radiographs: comparison between liquid crystal display and high-resolution cathode-ray tube monitors. Radiology 234 (2005) 611-616
29. Krupinski E.A., Johnson J., Roehrig H., et al. Use of a human visual system model to predict observer performance with CRT vs LCD display of images. J Dig Imaging 17 (2004) 258-263
30. D'Orsi C. Illustrated Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) (1998), American College of Radiology, Reston, Va
31. Kerlikowske K., Smith-Bindman R., Abraham L.A., et al. Breast cancer yield for screening mammographic examinations with recommendation for short-interval follow-up. Radiology 234 (2005) 684-692