Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of microcalcifications: Diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a clinical setting

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 48, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 714-720

  Uematsu, T ^a   Kasami, M ^a   Uchida, Y ^a  

^a SHIZUOKA CANCER CENTER   (Japan)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Cathode ray tube monitor; Digital imaging; Digital mammography; Liquid crystal monitor; Soft copy display

Indexed keywords

CATHODES; IMAGE QUALITY; LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAYS; MEDICAL IMAGING; PIXELS;

BREAST CANCER; CATHODE RAY TUBE MONITORS; DIGITAL IMAGING; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; LIQUID CRYSTAL MONITORS; SOFT COPY DISPLAY;

MAMMOGRAPHY;

ARTICLE; BREAST DISEASE; CALCINOSIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER TERMINAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; LIQUID CRYSTAL; MAMMOGRAPHY; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING;

BREAST DISEASES; CALCINOSIS; COMPUTER TERMINALS; DATA DISPLAY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIQUID CRYSTALS; MAMMOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 34548352875     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02841850701370691     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. American College of Radiology, Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). 4th ed, Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003.
2. Bacher K, Smeets P, Hauwere AD, Voet T, Duyck P, Verstraete K, et al. Image quality performance of liquid crystal display systems: influence of display resolution, magnification and window settings on contrast-detail detection. Eur J Radiol 2006;58:471-9.
3. Baker JA, Kornguth PJ, Floyd CE Jr. Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description. Am J Roentgenol 1996;166:773-8.
4. Berg WA, Campassi C, Langenberg P, Sexton MJ. Breast imaging reporting and data system: inter-and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. Am J Roentogenol 2000;174:1769-77.
5. Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK, Fryback DG, Clarke L, Zelen M, et al. Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1784-92.
6. Duffy SW, Tabar L, Vitak B, Day NE, Smith RA, Chen HHT, et al. The relative contributions of screen-detected in situ and invasive breast carcinomas in reducing mortality from the disease. Eur J Cancer 2003;39:1755-60.
7. Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, Woolf SH. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2002;137:347-60.
8. Kotter E, Bley TA, Saueressig U, Fisch D, Springer O, Winterer JT, et al. Comparison of the detectability of high- and low-contrast details on a TFT screen and a CRT screen designed for radiologic diagnosis. Invest Radiol 2003;38:719-24.
9. Lewin LM, Hendrick RE, D'Orsi CJ, Isaacs PK, Moss LJ, Karellas A, et al. Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations. Radiology 2001;218:873-80.
10. Morrow M, Schnitt SJ, Harris JR. Ductal carcinoma in situ and microinvasive carcinoma. In: Harris JR, editor. Disease of the breast. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000. P. 383-401.
11. Pavlicek W, Owen JM, Peter MB. Active matrix liquid crystal displays for clinical imaging: comparison with cathode ray tubes. J Digit Imaging 2000;13:155-61.
12. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, Yaffe M, Baum JK, Acharyya S, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1773-83.
13. Saunders RS, Samei E, Baker J, Delong D, Soo MS, Walsh R, et al. Comparison of LCD and CRT display based on efficacy for digital mammography. Acad Radiol 2006;13:1317-26.
14. Skaane P, Skjennald A. Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program - the Oslo 2 study. Radiology 2004;232:197-204.
15. Zuley M, Willison KM, Bonaccio E, Miller DP, Leong DL, Seifert PJ, et al. Full-field digital mammography on LCD versus CRT monitors. Am J Roentogenol 2006;187:1492-8.