Probabilistic design of aluminum sheet drawing for reduced risk of wrinkling and fracture

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 94, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 152-161

  Zhang, Wenfeng ^a   Shivpuri, Rajiv ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

FEM; Process uncertainties; Sheet forming

Indexed keywords

ALUMINA; DEEP DRAWING; DESIGN; DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FRICTION; PROBABILITY; TRIBOLOGY;

BLANK HOLDER FORCES; BLANK SHAPES; DESIGN APPROACHES; DETERMINISTIC DESIGNS; DRAWABILITY; DRAWING DEPTHS; DRAWING PROCESSES; FEM; FIDELITY MODELS; FRICTION COEFFICIENTS; INTERFACE FRICTIONS; MATERIAL PROPERTIES; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; OPTIMAL COMBINATIONS; PROBABILISTIC APPROACHES; PROBABILISTIC DESIGNS; PROBABILISTIC OPTIMIZATIONS; PROCESS MECHANICS; PROCESS PARAMETERS; PROCESS UNCERTAINTIES; PROCESS VARIATIONS; QUALITY INDICES; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODS; SHEET FORMING; THINNING; TOOLING DESIGNS;

PROCESS ENGINEERING;

EID: 54049094023     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2008.02.024     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Logue B., and Dingle M. Side-wall thickness in draw die forming. J Mater Process Technol 182 (2007) 191-194
2. Wang X., and Cao J. On the prediction of side-wall wrinkling in sheet metal forming processes. Int J Mech Sci 42 12 (2000) 2369-2394
3. Pegada V., Chun Y., and Santhanam S. An algorithm for determining the optimal blank shape for the deep drawing of aluminum cups. J Mater Process Technol 125-126 (2002) 743-750
4. Moshksar M.M., and Zamanian A. Optimization of the tool geometry in the deep drawing of aluminum. J Mater Process Technol 72 (1997) 363-370
5. Naceur H., and Guo Y.Q. Optimization of drawbead restraining forces and drawbead design in sheet metal forming process. Int J Mech Sci 43 (2001) 2407-2434
6. Majeske K.D., and Hammett P.C. Identifying sources of variation in sheet metal stamping. Int J Flexible Manuf Syst (2002)
7. Gantar G., and Kuzman K. Sensitivity and stability evaluation of the deep drawing process. J Mater Process Technol 125-126 (2002) 302-308
8. Karthik V., Comstock R.J., and Wagoner R.H. Variability of sheet formability and formability testing. J Mater Process Technol 121 (2002) 350-362
9. Cao J., and Kinsey B.L. Next generation stamping dies-controllability and flexibility. Robotics Comput Integrated Manuf 17 (2001) 49-56
10. Buranathiti T, Cao J, Xia ZC, Chen W. Probabilistic design in a sheet metal stamping process under failure analysis. In: Smith A, et al., editors. Numisheet 2005. CP778 vol. A, Detroit, MI, American Institute of Physics; 2005. p. 867-72.
11. Kleiber M., Rojek J., and Stocki R. Reliability assessment for sheet metal forming operations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 191 (2002) 4511-4532
12. Jansson T., and Nilsson L. Optimizing sheet metal forming processes-using a design hierarchy and response surface methodology. J Mater Process Technol 178 (2006) 218-233
13. Jansson T., and Nilsson L. Minimizing the risk of failure in a sheet metal forming process. Struct Multidisciplinary Optim 31 (2006) 320-332
14. Sahai A, Cao J, Xia CZ. Sequential optimization and reliability assessment method for metal forming processes. NUMIFORM 2004, Columbus, OH, USA, 2004.
15. Haldar A., and Mahadevan S. Reliability assessment using stochastic finite element analysis (2000), Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
16. Marler R.T., and Arora J.S. Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering. Struct Multidisciplinary Optim 26 (2004) 369-395
17. Yang B.S., Yeun Y.S., and Ruy W.S. Managing approximation models in multiobjective optimization. Struct Multidisciplinary Optim 24 (2002) 141-156
18. Irfan K, McMahonand C, Xianyi M. Reliability-based structural optimization using the response surface method and Monte Carlo simulation. In: Eighth international machine design and production conference, 1998, Ankara, Turkey.
19. Sirkirk J.F. Process variable effects on sheet metal quality. J Appl Metalwork Am Soc Met (1986) 262-269
20. Jaisingh A., and Narasimhan K. Sensitivity analysis of a deep drawing process for miniaturized products. J Mater Process Technol 147 (2004) 321-327
21. Lee B.H., Kenum Y.T., and Wagoner R.H. Modeling of the friction caused by lubrication and surface roughness in sheet metal forming. J Mater Process Technol 130-131 (2002) 60-63
22. Sheng ZQ, Shivpuri R. Adaptive PI control strategy for prediction of variable blank holder force. ESAFORM 2004, Trondheim, Norway, April 28-30, 2004.
23. Meyers R.H., and Montgomery D.C. Response surface methodology (1995), Wiley & Sons Inc., New York