Optimizing sheet metal forming processes-Using a design hierarchy and response surface methodology

Journal of Materials Processing Technology

Volumn 178, Issue 1-3, 2006, Pages 218-233

  Jansson, T ^a   Nilsson, L ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Design hierarchy; Optimization; Response surfaces; Sheet metal forming; Simulation

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; OPTIMIZATION; SHEET METAL; STRAIN;

DESIGN HIERARCHY; RESPONSE SURFACES; SHEET METAL FORMING; SURFACE METHODOLOGY;

METAL FORMING;

EID: 33746758223     PISSN: 09240136     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.03.040     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Makinouchi A. Sheet metal forming simulation in industry. J. Mater. Proc. Technol. 60 (1996) 19-26
2. Makinouchi A., Teodosiu C., and Nakagawa T. Advance in FEM simulation and its related technologies in sheet metal forming. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 47 2 (1998) 641-649
3. A. Andersson, Use of FE-analysis in predicting and verifying the design of an automotive component forming process, with special regard to macro geometric defects, Licentiate thesis, Division of Production and Material Engineering. LTH, Lund, 2001.
4. Myers R., and Montgomery D. Response Surface Methodology (1995), John Wiley, New York
5. Roux W., Stander N., and Haftka R.T. Response surface approximations for structural optimization. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 42 (1998) 517-534
6. N. Stander, W. Roux, S. Pattabiraman, R. Dhulipudi, Response surface approximations for design optimization problems in nonlinear dynamics, ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference Boston 1999, vol. 396. PVP-99-0304524-7, 1999, pp. 275-284.
7. Kok S., and Stander N. Optimization of a sheet metal forming process using successive multipoint approximations. Struct. Optim. 18 (1999) 277-295
8. Stander N. Springback compensation in sheet metal forming using a successive response surface method. Proceedings of the 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization. September 4-6 (2002), AIAA, Atlanta 2002-5539
9. Naceur H., Guo Y., Batoz C., and Knopf-Lenoir C. Optimization of drawbead restraining forces and drawbead design in sheet metal forming process. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 43 (2001) 2407-2434
10. Jansson T., Andersson A., and Nilsson L. Optimization of draw-in for an automotive sheet metal part-an evaluation using surrogate models and response surfaces. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 159 (2005) 426-434
11. Abe Y., Mori K., and Ebilhara O. Optimisation of the distribution of wall thickness in the multistage sheet metal forming of wheel disks. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 125-126 (2002) 792-797
12. Doege E., and Elend L.-E. Design and application of pliable blank holder systems for the optimization of process conditions in sheet metal forming. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 111 (2001) 182-187
13. Gantar G., Pepelnjak T., and Kuzman K. Optimization of sheet metal forming processes by the use of numerical simulations. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 130-131 (2002) 54-59
14. Guo Y.Q., Batoz J.L., Naceur H., Bouabdallah S., Mercier F., and Bartlet O. Recent developments on the analysis and optimum design of sheet metal forming parts using a simplified inverse approach. Comput. Struct. 78 (2000) 133-148
15. Hino R., Yoshida F., and Toropov V. Optimization of blank design for deep drawing process based on the interaction of high and low fidelity models. Proceedings of the 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization. September 4-6 (2002), AIAA, Atlanta 2002-5564
16. Jensen M.R., Damborg F.F., Nielsen K.B., and Danckert J. Optimization of the draw-die design in conventional deep-drawing in order to minimise tool wear. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 83 (1998) 106-114
17. Kim J.Y., Kim N., and Huh M.S. Optimum blank design of an automobile sub-frame. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 101 (2000) 31-43
18. Kubli W., and Reissner J. Optimization of sheet-metal forming processes using the special-purpose program AUTOFORM. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 50 (1995) 292-305
19. Ohata T., Nakamura Y., Katayama T., Nakamachi E., and Nakano K. Development of optimum process design systems by numerical simulation. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 60 (1996) 543-548
20. Park S.H., Yoon J.W., Yang D.Y., and Kim Y.H. Optimum blank design in sheet metal forming by the deformation path iteration method. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 41 (1999) 1217-1232
21. Pepelnjak T., Gantar G., and Kuzman K. Numerical simulations in optimization of product and forming process. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 115 (2001) 122-126
22. Santos A.D., Duarte J.F., Reis A., da Rocha B., Neto R., and Paiva R. The use of finite element simulation for optimization of metal forming and tool design. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 119 (2001) 152-157
23. Shim H., Son K., and Kim K. Optimum blank shape design by sensitivity analysis. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 104 (2000) 191-199
24. Sosnowski W., Marczewska I., and Marczewski A. Sensitivity based optimization of sheet metal forming tools. J. Mater. Process. Technol 124 (2002) 319-328
25. Stander N. The successive response surface method applied to sheet-metal forming. In: Bathe K.J. (Ed). The First MIT Conference on Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics Boston. June 12-15 (2001), Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford
26. Jansson T., Nilsson L., and Redhe M. Using surrogate models and response surfaces in structural optimization with application to crashworthiness design and sheet metal forming. Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 25 2 (2003) 129-140
27. Redhe M., Forsberg J., Jansson T., Marklund P.O., and Nilsson L. Using the response surface methodology and the D-optimality criterion in crashworthiness related problems. Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 24 3 (2002) 185-194
28. Stander N., Craig K., and Roux W. LS-OPT User's Manual, vol. 2 (2002), Livermore Software Technology Corporation, Livermore
29. Hallquist J.O. LS-DYNA Theoretical Manual (1998), Livermore Software Technology Corporation, Livermore