Minimizing the risk of failure in a sheet metal forming process: Optimization using space mapping with one-step and incremental solvers

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 320-332

  Jansson, T ^a   Nilsson, L ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Incremental solver; One step solver; Response surface methodology; Sheet metal forming; Space mapping

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; FAILURE ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MAPPING; OPTIMIZATION; PLASTICITY;

INCREMENTAL SOLVER; ONE-STEP SOLVER; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; SHEET METAL FORMING; SPACE MAPPING (SM);

SHEET METAL;

EID: 33644975265     PISSN: 1615147X     EISSN: 16151488     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-005-0604-3     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Andersson A (2001) Use of FE-analysis in predicting and verifying the design of an automotive component forming process, with special regard to macro geometric defects. Licentiate thesis, Division of Production and Materials Engineering, Lund Institute of technology (LTH), Lund University, Lund
2. Belytschko T, Liu WK, Moran B (2001) Nonlinear finite elements for continua and structures. Wiley, New York
3. Forming Technologies Incorporated (2000) Fast_Form3D user manual v. 7.2. Forming Technologies Incorporated, Oakville
4. Hallquist JO (1998) LS-DYNA theoretical manual. Livermore Software Technology Corp., Livermore
5. Jansson T, Nilsson L, Redhe M (2003) Using surrogate models and response surfaces in structural optimization - with application to crashworthiness design and sheet metal forming. Struct Multidisc Optim 25(2):129-140
6. Jansson T, Andersson A, Nilsson L (2005) Optimization of draw-in for an automotive sheet metal part - an evaluation using surrogate models and response surfaces. J Mater Process Technol 159:426-434
7. Kok S, Stander N (1999) Optimization of a sheet metal forming process using successive multipoint approximations. Struct Optim 18:277-295
8. Leary S, Bhasker A, Keane A (2000) A constraint mapping approach to the structural optimization of an expensive model using surrogates. In: Madsen K (ed) Conference on surrogate modelling and space mapping for engineering optimization, Lyngby
9. Madsen K, Sondergaard J (2000) Space mapping from a mathematical viewpoint. In: Madsen K (ed) Conference on surrogate modelling and space mapping for engineering optimization, Lyngby
10. Makinouchi A (1996) Sheet metal forming simulation in industry. J Mater Process Technol 60:19-26
11. Makinouchi A, Teodosiu C, Nakagawa T (1998) Advance in FEM simulation and its related technologies in sheet metal forming. CIRP Ann 47(2):641-649
12. Myers R, Montgomery D (1995) Response surface methodology. Wiley, New York
13. Ogden RW (1997) Non-linear elastic deformations. Dover, New York
14. Redhe M, Nilsson L (2004) A multipoint version of space mapping optimization applied to vehicle crashworthiness design. Struct Multidisc Optim (in press). 10.1007/s00158-005-0544-y
15. Redhe M, Forsberg J, Jansson T, Marklund P-O, Nilsson L (2002) Using the response surface methodology and the D-optimality criterion in crashworthiness related problems. Struct Multidisc Optim 24(3):185-194
16. Roux W, Stander N, Haftka RT (1998) Response surface approximations for structural optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 42:517-534
17. Stander N (2001) The successive response surface method applied to sheet-metal forming. In: Bathe KJ (ed) Proceedings of the first MIT conference on computational fluid and solid mechanics, Boston, 12-14 June 2001. Elsevier, Oxford
18. Stander N (2002) Springback compensation in sheet metal forming using a successive response surface method. 9th AIAA/ISSMO symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization, AIAA 2002-5539, Atlanta
19. Stander N, Roux W, Pattabiraman S, Dhulipudi R (1999) Response surface approximations for design optimization problems in nonlinear dynamics. ASME pressure vessels and piping conference, PVP-99-0304524-7;396, Boston, pp 275-284
20. Stander N, Craig K, Roux W (2002) LS-OPT user's manual v. 2. Livermore Software Technology Corporation, Livermore