Low levels of relatedness on black grouse leks despite male philopatry

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 17, Issue 20, 2008, Pages 4512-4521

  Lebigre, C ^a   Alatalo, R V ^a   Forss, H E ^a   Siitari, H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

Black grouse; Dispersal; Indirect benefits; Kin aggregation; Kin selection; Lek

Indexed keywords

DNA; MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; FINLAND; GALLIFORMES; GENE FLOW; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; INHERITANCE; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION GENETICS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALS; DNA; FINLAND; GALLIFORMES; GENE FLOW; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOTYPE; INHERITANCE PATTERNS; MALE; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MODELS, GENETIC; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

TETRAO TETRIX;

EID: 53749088355     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: 1365294X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03926.x     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Alatalo RV, Höglund J, Lundberg A (1991) Lekking in the black grouse- a test of male viability. Nature, 352, 155 156.
2. Alatalo RV, Höglund J, Lundberg A, Sutherland WJ (1992) Evolution of black grouse leks: female preferences benefit males in larger leks. Behavioral Ecology, 3, 53 59.
3. Beehler BM, Foster MS (1988) Hotshots, hotspots, and female preference in the organization of lek mating systems. The American Naturalist, 131, 203 219.
4. Bouzat JL, Johnson K (2004) Genetic structure among closely spaced leks in a peripheral population of lesser prairie-chickens. Molecular Ecology, 13, 499 505.
5. Boyko AR, Gibson RM, Lucas JR (2004) How predation risk affects the temporal dynamics of avian leks: greater sage grouse versus golden eagles. The American Naturalist, 163, 154 165.
6. Bradbury JW (1981) The evolution of leks. In : Natural Selection and Social Behaviour (eds Alexander RD, Tinkle DW pp. 138 169. Chiron Press, New York and Concord.
7. Bradbury JW, Gibson RM (1983) Leks and mate choice. In : Mate Choice (ed. Bateson P pp. 109 138. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
8. Bradbury JW, Gibson RM, Tai IM (1986) Hotspots and the dispersion of leks. Animal Behaviour, 34, 1694 1709.
9. Caizergues A, Dubois S, Loiseau A, Mondor G, Rasplus JY (2001) Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci in black grouse (Tetrao tetrix). Molecular Ecology Notes, 1, 36 38.
10. Caizergues A, Ellison LN (2002) Natal dispersal and its consequences in black grouse Tetrao tetrix. Ibis, 144, 478 487.
11. DuVal EH (2007) Adaptive advantages of cooperative courtship for subordinate male lance-tailed manakins. The American Naturalist, 169, 423 432.
12. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin ver. 3.0: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online, 1, 47 50.
13. Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2002) Introduction to Conservation Genetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
14. Gibson RM, Pirs D, Delaney KS, Wayne RK (2005) Microsatellite DNA analysis shows that greater sage grouse leks are not kin groups. Molecular Ecology, 14, 4453 4459.
15. Goodnight KF, Queller DC (1999) Computer software for performing likelihood tests of pedigree relationship using genetic markers. Molecular Ecology, 8, 1231 1234.
16. Goudet J (2001) fstat, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). Available from URL: http://www.unil.ch/ izea/softwares/fstat.html. Updated from Goudet (1995).
17. Goudet J, Perrin N, Waser P (2002) Tests for sex-biased dispersal using bi-parentally inherited genetic markers. Molecular Ecology, 11, 1103 1114.
18. Greenwood PJ, Harvey PH (1982) Natal dispersal and breeding dispersal of birds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 13, 1 21.
19. Griffin AS, West SA (2002) Kin selection: fact and fiction. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17, 15 21.
20. Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1 52.
21. Hauber ME, Sherman PW (2001) Self-referent phenotype matching: theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Trends in Neurosciences, 24, 609 616.
22. Höglund J, Alatalo RV (1995) Leks. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
23. Höglund J, Alatalo RV, Lundberg A, Rintamäki PT, Lindell J (1999) Microsatellite markers reveal the potential for kin selection on black grouse leks. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 266, 813 816.
24. Höglund J, Shorey L (2003) Local genetic structure in a white-bearded manakin population. Molecular Ecology, 12, 2457 2463.
25. Hood GM (2006) PopTools version 2.7.5. Available from URL: http://www.cse.csiro.au/poptools.
26. Hovi M, Alatalo RV, Höglund J, Lundberg A, Rintamäki PT (1994) Lek centre attracts black grouse females. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 258, 303 305.
27. Hovi M, Alatalo RV, Lundberg A (1997) Responses of male and female black grouse to male vocal display. Ethology, 103, 1032 1041.
28. Jiguet F, Bretagnolle V (2006) Manipulating lek size and composition using decoys: an experimental investigation of the lek evolution models. The American Naturalist, 168, 758 768.
29. Knopp T, Heimovirta M, Kokko H, Merilä J (2008) Do male moor frogs (Rana arvalis) lek with kin? Molecular Ecology, 17, 2522 2530.
30. Kokko H, Johnston RA (1999) Social queuing in animal societies: a dynamic model of reproductive skew. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 266, 571 578.
31. Kokko H, Lindström J (1996) Kin selection and the evolution of leks: whose success do young males maximize? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 263, 919 923.
32. Kokko H, Lindström J, Alatalo RV, Rintamäki PT (1998) Queuing for territory positions in the lekking black grouse (Tetrao tetrix). Behavioral Ecology, 9, 376 383.
33. Kokko H, Rintamäki PT, Alatalo RV, Höglund J, Karvonen E, Lundberg A (1999) Female choice selects for lifetime lekking performance in black grouse males. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 266, 2109 2115.
34. Komdeur J, Hatchwell BJ (1999) Kin recognition: function and mechanism in avian societies. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14, 237 241.
35. Koskimies (1957) Flocking behaviour in Capercaillie, Tetrao urogallus (L.) and Blackgame, Lyrurus tetrix (L.). Finnish Game Research, 18, 1 32.
36. Krakauer AH (2005) Kin selection and cooperative courtship in wild turkeys. Nature, 434, 69 72.
37. Lambin X, Aars J, Piertney SB (2001) Dispersal, intraspecific competition, kin competition and kin facilitation: a review of the empirical evidence. In : Dispersal (eds Clobert J, Danchin E, Dhondt AA, Nichols JD pp. 110 122. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
38. Lanctot RB, Scribner KT, Kempenaers B, Weatherhead PJ (1997) Lekking without a paradox in the buff-breasted sandpiper. The American Naturalist, 149, 1051 1070.
39. Lebigre C, Alatalo RV, Siitari H, Parri S (2007) Restrictive mating by females on black grouse leks. Molecular Ecology, 16, 4380 4389.
40. Loiselle BA, Ryder TB, Durães R, Tori W, Blake JG, Parker PG (2007) Kin selection does not explain male aggregation at leks of 4 manakin species. Behavioral Ecology, 18, 287 291.
41. MacColl ADC, Piertney SB, Moss R, Lambin X (2000) Spatial arrangement of kin affects recruitment success in young male red grouse. Oikos, 90, 261 270.
42. Manly BF (1997) Randomization and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall, London.
43. Marjakangas A, Kiviniemi S (2005) Dispersal and migration of female black grouse (Tetrao tetrix) in eastern central Finland. Ornis Fennica, 82, 107 116.
44. McDonald DB, Potts WK (1994) Cooperative display and relatedness among males in a lek-mating bird. Science, 266, 1030 1032.
45. Møller AP, Alatalo RV (1999) Good-genes effects in sexual selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 266, 85 91.
46. Møller AP, Garamszegi LZ, Spottiswoode CN (2008) Genetic similarity, breeding distribution range and sexual selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21, 213 225.
47. Nussey DH, Coltman DW, Coulson T et al 2005) Rapidly declining fine-scale spatial genetic structure in female red deer. Molecular Ecology, 14, 3395 3405.
48. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) genalex 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetics for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes, 6, 288 295.
49. Petrie M, Krupa A, Burke T (1999) Peacocks lek with relatives even in the absence of social and environmental cues. Nature, 401, 155 157.
50. Piertney SB, Höglund J (2001) Polymorphic microsatellite DNA markers in black grouse (Tetrao tetrix). Molecular Ecology Notes, 1, 303 304.
51. Piertney SB, Lambin X, MacColl ADC et al 2008) Temporal changes in kin structure through a population cycle in a territorial bird, the red grouse Lagopus lagopus scoticus. Molecular Ecology, 17, 2544 2551.
52. Piertney SB, MacColl ADC, Lambin X, Moss R, Dallas JF (1999) Spatial distribution of genetic relatedness in a moorland population of red grouse (Lagopus lagopus scoticus). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 68, 317 331.
53. Prugnolle F, de Meeus T (2002) Inferring sex-biased dispersal from population genetic tools: a review. Heredity, 88, 161 165.
54. Queller DC (1994) Genetic relatedness in viscous populations. Evolutionary Ecology, 8, 70 73.
55. Queller DC, Goodnight KF (1989) Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution, 43, 258 275.
56. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GenePop (version 1.2): a population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenism. Journal of Heredity, 86, 248 249.
57. Regnaut S, Christe P, Chapuisat M, Fumagalli L (2006) Genotyping faeces reveals facultative kin association on capercaillie's leks. Conservation Genetics, 7, 665 674.
58. Rintamäki PT, Alatalo RV, Höglund J, Lundberg A (1995) Male territoriality and female choice on black grouse leks. Animal Behaviour, 49, 759 767.
59. Rousset F (1997) Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance. Genetics, 145, 1219 1228.
60. Rousset F (2002) Inbreeding and relatedness coefficients: what do they measure? Heredity, 88, 371 380.
61. Sæther SA (2002) Kin selection, female preference and the evolution of leks: direct benefits may explain kin structuring. Animal Behaviour, 63, 1017 1019.
62. Segelbacher G, Paxton RJ, Steinbrück G, Trontelj P, Storch I (2000) Characterization of microsatellites in capercaillie Tetrao urogallus (AVES). Molecular Ecology, 9, 1934 1935.
63. Segelbacher G, Wegge P, Sivkov AV, Höglund J (2007) Kin groups in closely spaced capercaillie leks. Journal of Ornithology, 148, 79 84.
64. Shorey L, Piertney SB, Stone J, Höglund J (2000) Fine-scale genetic structuring on Manacus manacus leks. Nature, 408, 352 353.
65. Siitari H, Alatalo RV, Halme P, Buchanan KL, Kilpimaa J (2007) Color signals in the black grouse (Tetrao tetrix): signal properties and their condition dependency. The American Naturalist, 169, S81 S92.
66. Wahlund S (1928) Zusammensetzung von Populationen und Korrelationserscheinungen von Standpunkt der Vererbungslehre aus betrachtet. Hereditas, 11, 65 106.
67. Waples RS, Gaggiotti O (2006) What is a population? An empirical evaluation of some genetic methods for identifying the number of gene pools and their degree of connectivity. Molecular Ecology, 15, 1419 1439.
68. Warren PK, Baines D (2002) Dispersal, survival and causes of mortality in black grouse Tetrao tetrix in northern England. Wildlife Biology, 8, 91 97.
69. Widemo F, Owens IPF (1995) Lek size, male mating skew and the evolution of lekking. Nature, 373, 148 151.
70. Willebrand T (1992) Breeding and age in female black grouse Tetrao tetrix. Ornis Scandinavica, 23, 29 32.