Restrictive mating by females on black grouse leks

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 16, Issue 20, 2007, Pages 4380-4389

  Lebigre, C ^a   Alatalo, R V ^a   Siitari, H ^a   Parri, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

Black grouse; Lek; Mate choice; Monogamy; Multiple paternity

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; FEMALE; GALLIFORMES; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; MALE; PEDIGREE; PHYSIOLOGY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; FEMALE; GALLIFORMES; GENE FREQUENCY; GENOTYPE; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MALE; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; PEDIGREE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

AVES; TETRAO TETRIX; TETRAONIDAE;

EID: 34848898082     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: 1365294X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03502.x     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Alatalo RV, Höglund J, Lundberg A, Sutherland WJ (1992) Evolution of black grouse leks: female preferences benefit males in larger leks. Behavioral Ecology, 3, 53 59.
2. Alatalo RV, Burke T, Dann J, et al 1996) Paternity, copulation disturbance and female choice in lekking black grouse. Animal Behaviour, 52, 861 873.
3. Ar A, Rahn H (1980) Water in the avian egg: overall budget of incubation. American Zoologist, 20, 373 384.
4. Birkhead TR, Møller AP (1992) Sperm Competition in Birds. Chapman & Hall, New York.
5. Birkhead TR, Møller AP (1993) Sexual selection and the temporal separation of reproductive events: sperm storage data from reptiles, birds and mammals. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 50, 295 311.
6. Bretman A, Tregenza T (2005) Measuring polyandry in wild populations: a case study using promiscuous crickets. Molecular Ecology, 14, 2169 2179.
7. Caizergues A, Ellison LN (2002) Natal dispersal and its consequences in black grouse Tetrao tetrix. Ibis, 144, 478 487.
8. Caizergues A, Dubois S, Loiseau A, Mondor G, Rasplus JY (2001) Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci in black grouse (Tetrao tetrix). Molecular Ecology Notes, 1, 36 38.
9. Charmantier A, Sheldon BC (2006) Testing genetic models of mate choice evolution in the wild. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21, 417 419.
10. Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science, 197, 215 223.
11. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman Group Ltd, Essex, UK.
12. Fiske P, Kålås JA (1995) Mate sampling and copulation behaviour of great snipe females. Animal Behaviour, 49, 209 219.
13. Foerster K, Delhey K, Johnsen A, Lifjeld JT, Kempenaers B (2003) Female increase heterozygosity and fitness through extra-pair matings. Nature, 425, 714 717.
14. Foerster K, Valcu M, Johnsen A, Kempenaers B (2006) A spatial genetic structure and effects of relatedness on mate choice in a wild bird population. Molecular Ecology, 15, 4555 4567.
15. Fossøy F, Johnsen A, Lifjeld JT (2006) Evidence of obligate female promiscuity in a socially monogamous passerine. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 60, 255 259.
16. Freeman-Gallant CR, Wheelwright NT, Meiklejohn KE, States SL, Sollecito SV (2005) Little effect of extra-pair paternity on the opportunity for sexual selection in savannah sparrows (Passerculus sandwichensis). Evolution, 59, 422 430.
17. Gibson RM, Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (1991) Mate choice in lekking sage grouse revisited: the roles of vocal display, female site fidelity and copying. Behavioral Ecology, 2, 165 180.
18. Griffith SC, Owens IPF, Thuman KA (2002) Extra pair paternity in birds: a review of interspecific variation and adaptive function. Molecular Ecology, 11, 2195 2212.
19. Hasselquist D, Sherman PW (2001) Social mating systems and extra pair fertilizations in passerine birds. Behavioral Ecology, 12, 457 466.
20. Helminen M (1963) Composition of the Finnish populations of capercaillie, Tetrao urogallus, and black grouse, Lyrurus tetrix, in the autumns of 1952-1961, as revealed by a study of wings. Riistatiet Julk, 8, 142 149.
21. Höglund J, Alatalo RV (1995) Leks. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
22. Höglund J, Alatalo RV, Lundberg A, Rintamäki PT, Lindell J (1999) Microsatellite markers reveal the potential for kin selection on black grouse leks. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 266, 813 816.
23. Hovi M, Alatalo RV, Höglund J, Lundberg A, Rintamäki PT (1994) Lek centre attracts black grouse females. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 258, 303 305.
24. Hovi M, Alatalo RV, Lundberg A (1997) Responses of male and female black grouse to male vocal display. Ethology, 103, 1032 1041.
25. Hunter FM, Petrie M, Otronen M, Birkhead T, Møller AP (1993) Why do females copulate repeatedly with one male? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 8, 21 26.
26. Isvaran K, St. Mary CM (2003) When should males lek? Insights from a dynamic state variable model. Behavioral Ecology, 14, 876 886.
27. Jennions MD, Petrie M (2000) Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biology Review, 75, 21 64.
28. Jones AG, Ardren WR (2003) Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations. Molecular Ecology, 12, 2511 2523.
29. Karvonen E, Rintamäki PT, Alatalo RV (2000) Female-female aggression and female mate choice on black grouse leks. Animal Behaviour, 59, 981 987.
30. Kokko H, Rintamäki PT, Alatalo RV, Höglund J, Karvonen E, Lundberg A (1999) Female choice selects for lifetime lekking performance in black grouse males. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 266, 2109 2115.
31. Kraaijeveld K, Carew PJ, Billing T, Adcock GJ, Mulder RA (2004) Extra-pair paternity does not result in differential sexual selection in the mutually ornamented black swan (Cygnus atratus). Molecular Ecology, 13, 1625 1633.
32. Krebs JR, Davies NB (1987) Introduction to Behavioural Ecology, 2nd edn. Blackwell Scientific publications, Oxford, UK.
33. Lanctot RB, Scribner KT, Kempenaers B, Weatherhead P (1997) Lekking without a paradox in the buff-breasted sandpiper. American Naturalist, 149, 1051 1070.
34. Lank DB, Smith CM, Hanotte O, Burke T, Cooke F (1995) Genetic polymorphism for alternative mating behaviour in lekking male ruff Philomachus pugnax. Nature, 378, 59 62.
35. Lank DB, Smith CM, Hanotte O, Ohtonen A, Bailey S, Burke T (2002) High frequency of polyandry in a lek mating system. Behavioral Ecology, 13, 209 215.
36. Løvlie H, Cornwallis CK, Pizzari T (2005) Male mounting alone reduces female promiscuity in the fowl. Current Biology, 15, 1222 1227.
37. Ludwig GX, Alatalo RV, Helle P, Lindén H, Lindström J, Siitari H (2006) Short- and long-term population dynamical consequences of asymmetric climate change in black grouse. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 273, 2009 2016.
38. Marjakangas A, Kiviniemi S (2005) Dispersal and migration of female black grouse (Tetrao tetrix) in eastern central Finland. Ornis Fennica, 82, 107 116.
39. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Molecular Ecology, 7, 639 655.
40. Michl G, Török J, Griffith SC, Sheldon BC (2002) Experimental analysis of sperm competition mechanisms in a wild bird population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 99, 5466 5470.
41. Møller AP (1992) Frequency of female copulations with multiple males and sexual selection. American Naturalist, 139, 1089 1101.
42. Møller AP, Alatalo RV (1999) Good-genes effects in sexual selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 266, 85 91.
43. Møller AP, Ninni P (1998) Sperm competition and sexual selection: a meta-analysis of paternity studies of birds. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 43, 345 358.
44. Neff BD, Pitcher TE (2002) Assessing the statistical power of genetic analyses to detect multiple mating in fishes. Journal of Fish Biology, 61, 739 750.
45. Parker GA, Sutherland WJ (1986) Ideal free distributions when individuals differ in competitive ability: phenotype-limited ideal free models. Animal Behaviour, 34, 1222 1242.
46. Parker H, Mjelstad H, Solheim JT (1989) Duration of fertility in capercaillie hens after separation from the males. Ornis Scandinavica, 20, 307 310.
47. Petrie M, Hall M, Halliday T, Budgey H, Pierpoint C (1992) Multiple mating in a lekking bird: why do peahens mate with more than one male and with the same male more than once? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 31, 349 358.
48. Piertney SB, Höglund J (2001) Polymorphic microsatellite DNA markers in black grouse (Tetrao tetrix). Molecular Ecology Notes, 1, 303 304.
49. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) genepop (version 1.2): a population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenism. Journal of Heredity, 86, 248 249.
50. Rintamäki PT, Alatalo RV, Höglund J, Lundberg A (1995) Mate sampling behaviour of black grouse females (Tetrao tetrix). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 37, 209 215.
51. Rintamäki PT, Lundberg A, Alatalo RV, Höglund J (1998) Assortative mating and female clutch investment in black grouse. Animal Behaviour, 56, 1399 1403.
52. Segelbacher G, Paxton RJ, Steinbrück G, Trontelj P, Storch I (2000) Characterization of microsatellites in capercaillie Tetrao urogallus (AVES). Molecular Ecology, 9, 1934 1935.
53. Semple K, Wayne RK, Gibson RM (2001) Microsatellite analysis of female mating behaviour in lek-breeding sage grouse. Molecular Ecology, 10, 2043 2048.
54. Sheldon BC, Ellegren H (1999) Sexual selection resulting from extrapair paternity in collared flycatchers. Animal Behaviour, 57, 285 298.
55. Thuman KA, Griffith SC (2005) Genetic similarity and the nonrandom distribution of paternity in a genetically highly polyandrous shorebird. Animal Behaviour, 69, 765 770.
56. Trail PW (1985) Courtship disruption modifies mate choice in a lek-breeding bird. Science, 227, 778 780.
57. Tregenza T, Wedell N (2000) Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage. Molecular Ecology, 9, 1013 1027.
58. Whittingham LA, Dunn PO (2004) Effects of extra-pair and within-pair reproductive success on the opportunity for sexual selection in birds. Behavioral Ecology, 16, 138 144.
59. Widemo F, Owens IPF (1995) Lek size, male mating skew and the evolution of lekking. Nature, 373, 148 151.
60. Yasui Y (1998) The 'genetic benefits' of female multiple mating reconsidered. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 13, 246 250.