Microsatellite DNA analysis shows that greater sage grouse leks are not kin groups

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 14, Issue 14, 2005, Pages 4453-4459

  Gibson, Robert M ^a   Pires, Debra ^b   Delaney, Kathleen S ^b   Wayne, Robert K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Kinship; Lek skew paradox; Microsatellite analysis; Sage grouse

Indexed keywords

AVES; CENTROCERCUS UROPHASIANUS;

MICROSATELLITE DNA; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GALLIFORMES; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION GENETICS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; CALIFORNIA; GALLIFORMES; GENETIC MARKERS; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOTYPE; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MALE; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; OLIGONUCLEOTIDES; SELECTION (GENETICS); SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 33746681878     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: 1365294X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02746.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bardeleben C, Palchevskiy V, Calsbeek R, Wayne RK (2004) Isolation of polymorphic tetranucleotide microsatellite markers for the brown anole (Anolis sagrei). Molecular Ecology Notes, 4, 176-178.
2. Bouzat JL, Johnson K (2003) Genetic structure among closely spaced leks in a peripheral population of lesser prairie chickens. Molecular Ecology, 13, 499-505.
3. Boyko AR, Gibson RM, Lucas JR (2004) How predation risk affects the temporal dynamics of avian leks: greater sage grouse versus golden eagles. American Naturalist, 163, 154-165.
4. Bradbury JW, Gibson RM, McCarthy CE, Vehrencamp SL (1989) Dispersion of displaying male sage grouse. II. The role of female dispersion. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 24, 15-24.
5. Gibson RM (1992) Lek formation in sage grouse: the effect of female choice on male territory settlement. Animal Behaviour, 43, 443-450.
6. Gibson RM (1996) A re-evaluation of hotspot settlement in lekking sage grouse. Animal Behaviour, 52, 993-1005.
7. Gibson RM, Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (1991) Mate choice in leking sage grouse revisited: the roles of vocal display, female site fidelity and copying. Behavioral Ecology, 2, 165-180.
8. Gibson RM, Aspbury AS, McDaniel L (2002) Active formation of mixed-species grouse leks: a role for predation in lek evolution? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 269, 2503-2508.
9. Höglund J, Alatalo RV (1995) Leks. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
10. Höglund J, Shorey L (2003) Local genetic structure in a whitebearded manakin population. Molecular Ecology, 12, 2457-2463.
11. Höglund J, Alatalo RV, Lundberg A, Rintamaki PT, Lindell J (1998) Microsatellite markers reveal the potential for kin selection in black grouse leks. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 266, 813-816.
12. Jacobs J (1974) Quantitative measurement of food selection. A modification of the forage ratio and Ivlev's electivity index. Oecologia, 14, 413-417.
13. Kokko H (1997) The lekking game: can female choice explain aggregated male displays? Journal of Theoretical Biology, 187, 57-64.
14. Kokko H, Lindström J (1996) Kin selection and the evolution of leks: whose success do young males maximize? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 263, 919-923.
15. Kokko H, Lindstrom J, Alatalo RV, Rintamaki PT (1998) Queuing for territory positions in lekking black grouse (Tetrao tetrix). Behavioral Ecology, 9, 376-383.
16. Krakauer A (2005) Kin selection and cooperative courtship in wild turkeys. Nature, 434, 69-72.
17. Lack D (1968) Ecological Adaptations for Breeding in Birds. Methuen, London.
18. Madden JR, Lowe TJ, Fuller HV et al. (2004) Neighbouring male spotted bowerbirds are not related, but do maraud each other. Animal Behaviour, 68, 751-758.
19. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Molecular Ecology, 7, 639-655.
20. Martin CA, Alonso JC, Alonso J, Pitra C, Lieckfeldt D (2001) Great bustard population structure in central Spain: concordant results from genetic analysis and dispersal study. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 269, 119-125.
21. McDonald DB, Potts WK (1994) Cooperative display and relatedness among males in a lek-mating bird. Science, 266, 1030-1032.
22. Petrie N, Krupa A, Burke T (1999) Peacocks leks with relatives even in the absence of social and environmental cues. Nature, 401, 155-157.
23. Piertney SB, Dallas JF (1997) Isolation and characterization of hypervariable microsatellites in the red grouse (Lagopus lagopus scotticus). Molecular Ecology, 6, 93-95.
24. Piertney SB, MacColl ADC, Bacon PJ, Dallas JF (1998) Local genetic structure in red grouse (Lagopus lagopus scotticus): evidence from microsatellite DNA markers. Molecular Ecology, 7, 1645-1654.
25. Queller DC, Goodnight K (1989) Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution, 43, 258-275.
26. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (version 1.2): a population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity, 86, 248-249.
27. Segelbacher G, Paxton IJ, Steinbruck G, Trontelj P, Storch I (2000) Characterization of microsatellites in the capercaillie, Tetrao urogallus (Aves). Molecular Ecology, 9, 1934-1935.
28. Semple KE, Wayne RK, Gibson RM (2002) Microsatellite analysis of female mating behavior in lek-breeding sage grouse. Molecular Ecology, 10, 2043-2048.
29. Seutin G, White BN, Boag PT (1991) Preservation of avian blood and tissue samples for DNA analysis. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 69, 82-90.
30. Shorey L, Piertney S, Stone J, Hoglund J (2000) Fine-scale genetic structuring on Manacus manacus leks. Nature, 408, 352-453.
31. Trail PW (1987) Predation and antipredator behavior at Guianian cock-of-the-rock leks. Auk, 104, 496-507.
32. Wiley RH (1973) Territoriality and non-random mating in sage grouse Centrocercus urophasianus. Animal Behaviour Monographs, 6, 85-169.