Kin selection does not explain male aggregation at leks of 4 manakin species

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 287-291

  Loiselle, Bette A ^a   Ryder, Thomas B ^a   Durães, Renata ^a   Tori, Wendy ^a   Blake, John G ^a   Parker, Patricia G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ST LOUIS   (United States)

Author keywords

Genetic relatedness; Kin selection; Lek breeding; Manakin; Pipridae

Indexed keywords

AGGREGATION BEHAVIOR; FITNESS; HABITAT SELECTION; KIN SELECTION; LEK; MALE BEHAVIOR; MATING SUCCESS; PASSERINE; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY;

AVES; PIPRIDAE;

EID: 33847650054     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: 14657279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arl081     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Alatalo RV, Hoglund J, Lundberg A, Sutherland WJ. 1992. Evolution of black grouse leks-female preferences benefit males in larger leks. Behav Ecol. 3:53-59.
2. Beehler BM, Foster MS. 1988. Hotshots, hotspots, and female preference in the organization of female mating preference. Am Nat. 131:203-219.
3. Bradbury JW. 1981. The evolution of leks. In: Alexander RD, Tinkle DW, editors. Natural selection and social behavior: research and new theory. New York: Chiron Press. p. 138-169.
4. Bradbury JW, Gibson RM. 1983. Leks and mate choice. In: Bateson P, editor. Mate choice. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. p. 109-138.
5. Duval EH, Nutt KJ. 2005. Isolation and characterization of polymorphic microsatellite loci in the lance-tailed manakin (Chiroxiphia lanceolata). Mol Ecol Notes. 2:112-114.
6. Gill FB. 1995. Ornithology. New York: WH Freeman and Co.
7. Goudet J. 2001. FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3) [Internet]. [Cited 2002 Feb]. Available from: http://www2.unil.ch/popgen/softwares/fstat.htm.
8. Greenwood PJ, Harvey PH, Perrins CM. 1979. Kin selection and territoriality in birds: a test. Anim Behav. 27:645-651.
9. Hoglund J, Alatalo RV, Lundberg A, Rintamäki PT, Lindell J. 1999. Microsatellite markers reveal the potential for kin selection on black grouse leks. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 266:813-816.
10. Hurst JL, Payne CE, Nevison CM, Marie AD, Humphries RE, Robertson DHL, Cavaggioni A, Beynon RJ. 2001. Individual recognition in mice mediated by major urinary proteins. Nature. 414:631-634.
11. Karubian J, Fabara J, Yunes D, Jorgenson JP, Romo D, Smith TB. 2005. Temporal and spatial patterns of macaw abundance in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Condor. 107:617-626.
12. Kokko H, Johnstone RA. 1999. Social queuing in animal societies: a dynamic model of reproductive skew. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 266:571-578.
13. Kokko H, Lindstrom J. 1996. Kin selection and the evolution of leks: whose success do young males maximize? Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 263:919-923.
14. Komdeur J, Hatchwell BJ. 1999. Kin recognition: function and mechanism in avian societies. Trends Ecol Evol. 14:237-241.
15. Krakauer AH. 2005. Kin selection and cooperative courtship in wild turkeys. Nature. 434:69-72.
16. Lacy RC, Sherman PW. 1983. Kin recognition by phenotype matching. Am Nat. 121:489-512.
17. Lill A. 1974. Social organization and space utilization in the lek-forming white-bearded manakin, M. manacus trinitatis Hartert. Z Tierpyschol. 36:513-530.
18. Loiselle BA, Blake JG. 1993. Spatial dynamics of understory fruit eating birds in a lowland wet forest. Vegetatio. 107/108:177-189.
19. Loiselle BA, Blake JG, Durães R, Ryder TB, Tori W. Forthcoming 2007. Environmental segregation in lek sites among six co-occurring species of manakins (Aves: Pipridae) in eastern Ecuador. Auk. 124.
20. Loiselle BA, Blendinger PG, Blake JG, Ryder TB. 2007. Ecological redundancy in seed dispersal systems: a comparison between manakins (Pipridae) in two tropical forests. In: Dennis AJ, Schupp EW, Green R, Westcott DW, editors. Seed dispersal: theory and its applications in a changing world. Wallingford, Oxfordshire (UK): CABI Publishing.
21. Longmire JL, Lewis AW, Brown NC, Buckingham JM, Clark LM, Jones MO, Meinke LJ, Meyne J, Ratliff RL, Ray FA, et al. 1988. Isolation and molecular characterization of a highly polymorphic entromeric tandem repeat in the family Falconidae. Genomics. 2:14-24.
22. McDonald DB. 1989. Correlates of male mating success in a lekking bird with male-male cooperation. Anim Behav. 37:1007-1022.
23. McDonald DB, Potts WK. 1994. Cooperative display and relatedness among males in a lek-mating bird. Science. 266:1030-1032.
24. Petrie M, Krupa A, Burke T. 1999. Peacocks lek with relatives even in the absence of social and environmental cues. Nature. 401:155-157.
25. Pfennig DW, Sherman PW, Collins JP. 1994. Kin recognition and cannibalism in polyphonic salamanders. Behav Ecol. 5:225-232.
26. Piertney SB, Shorey L, Hoglund J. 2002. Characterization of microsatellite DNA markers in the white-bearded manakin (Manacus manacus). Mol Ecol Notes. 2:504-505.
27. Prum RO. 1994. Phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of alternative social behavior in the manakins (Aves: Pipridae). Evolution. 48:1657-1675.
28. Queller DC, Goodnight KF. 1989. Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution. 43:258-275.
29. Ryder TB, Blake JG, Loiselle BA. 2006. A test of the environmental hotspot hypothesis for lek placement in three species of manakins (Pipridae) in Ecuador. Auk. 123:247-258.
30. Saether SA. 2002. Kin selection, female preferences and the evolution of leks: direct benefits may explain kin structuring. Anim Behav. 63:1017-1019.
31. Schwartz P, Snow DW. 1978. Display and related behavior of the wire-tailed manakin. Living Bird. 17:51-78.
32. Shorey L, Piertney S, Stone J, Hoglund J. 2000. Fine-scale genetic structuring on Manacus manacus leks. Nature. 408:352-353.
33. Shuster SM, Wade MJ. 2003. Mating systems and strategies. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
34. Snow DW. 1962. A field study of the black and white manakin, Manacus manacus, in Trinidad. Zoologica. 47:65-104.
35. Snow DW. 2004. Family Pipridae (Manakins). In: Del Hoyo J, Elliot A, Christie D, editors. Handbook of the birds of the world. Volume 9: Cotingids to Pipits and Wagtails. Barcelona (Spain): Lynx Editions. p. 110-169.
36. van der Jeugd HP, van der Veen IT, Larsson K. 2002. Kin clustering in barnacle geese: familiarity or phenotype-matching? Behav Ecol. 13:786-790.
37. West SA, Pen I, Griffin AS. 2002. Cooperation and competition between relatives. Science. 296:72-75.
38. Westcott DA. 1994. Leks of leks: a role for hotspots in lek evolution? Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 258:281-286.
39. Widemo F, Owens IPF. 1995. Lek size, male mating skew and the evolution of lekking. Nature. 373:148-151.
40. Yamasaki K, Beauchamp GK, Curran M, Bard J, Boyse EA. 2000. Parent-progeny recognition as a function of MHC odor identity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 97:10500-10502.