SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 36, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 885-891

  Magni, Elisa ^a   Zhang, Ling ^b   Hickel, Reinhard ^c   Bossù, Maurizio ^d   Polimeni, Antonella ^d   Ferrari, Marco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

^b FOURTH MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^d SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Class V restorations; Coating material; Marginal integrity; Microleakage; SEM

Indexed keywords

GLASS IONOMER; RESIN;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; HISTORY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PREMOLAR TOOTH; TOOTH BRUSHING; TOOTH DISEASE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BICUSPID; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING, LIGHT-CURED; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CAVITY LINING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HISTORY, MEDIEVAL; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 53549124387     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Peumans M., Kanumilli P., De Munck J., Van Landuyt K., Lambrechts P., and Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dental Materials 21 (2005) 864-881
2. Hickel R., Dasch W., Janda R., Tyas M., and Anusavice K. New direct restorative materials. FDI Commission Project. International Dental Journal 48 (1998) 3-16
3. Tyas M.J., and Burrow M.F. Adhesive restorative materials: a review. Australian Dental Journal 49 (2004) 112-121
4. Croll T.P., and Nicholson J.W. Glass ionomer cements in pediatric dentistry: review of the literature. Pediatric Dentistry 24 (2002) 423-429
5. Berg J.H. Glass ionomer cements. Pediatric Dentistry 24 (2002) 430-438
6. Rutar J., McAllan L., and Tyas M.J. Three-year clinical performance of glass ionomer cement in primary molars. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 12 (2002) 146-147
7. Taifour D., Frencken J.E., Beiruti N., van't Hof M.A., and Truin G.J. Effectiveness of glass-ionomer (ART) and amalgam restorations in the deciduous dentition: results after 3 years. Caries Research 36 (2002) 437-444
8. Scott J.M., and Mahoney E.K. Restoring proximal lesions in the primary dentition: is glass ionomer cement the material of choice?. New Zealand Dental Journal 99 (2003) 65-71
9. Nikolaos K., Vassiliki T., Christine T., and Eirini T. The early fluoride release pattern of an aged glass ionomer treated with fluoride. European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry 15 (2007) 135-141
10. Davidovich E., Weiss E., Fuks A.B., and Beyth N. Surface antibacterial properties of glass ionomer cements used in atraumatic restorative treatment. Journal of the American Dental Association 138 (2007) 1347-1352
11. Mount G.J. Minimal intervention dentistry: rationale of cavity design. Operative Dentistry 28 (2003) 92-99
12. Noack M.J., Wicht M.J., and Haak R. Lesion orientated caries treatment-a classification of carious dentin treatment procedures. Oral Health & Preventive Dentistry 2 (2004) 301-306
13. Frencken J.E., Makoni F., Sithole W.D., and Hackenitz E. 3-year results of ART restorations and GI sealants. Journal of Dental Research 77 (1998) 1279
14. Edelberg M.H., and Basso M.L. Atraumatic restorative treatment - three years clinical evaluation. Journal of Dental Research 78 (1999) 368
15. Ho T.F., Smales R.J., and Fang D.T. A 2-year clinical study of two glass ionomer cements used in the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 27 (1999) 195-201
16. Lo E.C., Luo Y., Fan M.W., and Wei S.H. Clinical investigation of two glass-ionomer restoratives used with the atraumatic restorative treatment approach in China: two-years results. Caries Research 35 (2001) 458-463
17. Taifour D., Frencken J.E., Beiruti N., Van't Hof M.A., Truin G.J., and Van Palenstein Helderman W.H. Three-year survival of ART and amalgam restorations in permanent dentitions. Journal of Dental Research 82 (2003) C498
18. Frencken J.E., Taifour D., and van ′t Hof M.A. Survival of ART and amalgam restorations in permanent teeth of children after 6.3 years. Journal of Dental Research 85 (2006) 622-626
19. Papacchini F., Cury A.H., Goracci C., Chieffi N., Tay F.R., Polimeni A., et al. Noninvasive pit and fissure sealing: microtensile bond strength to intact bovine enamel of different pit and fissure sealants in a simplified fissure model. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 8 (2006) 375-380
20. Papacchini F., Goracci C., Sadek F.T., Monticelli F., Garcia-Godoy F., and Ferrari M. Microtensile bond strength to ground enamel by glass-ionomers, resin-modified glass-ionomers, and resin composites used as pit and fissure sealants. Journal of Dentistry 33 (2005) 459-467
21. Loguercio A.D., Alessandra R., Mazzocco K.C., Dias A.L., Busato A.L., Singer Jda M., et al. Microleakage in class II composite resin restorations: total bonding and open sandwich technique. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 4 (2002) 137-144
22. De C., Luz M.A., Ciaramicoli-Rodrigues M.T., Garone Netto N., and De Lima A.C. Long-term clinical evaluation of fracture and pulp injury following glass-ionomer cement or composite resin applied as a base filling in teeth restored with amalgam. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 28 (2001) 634-639
23. Liebenberg W. Return to the resin-modified glass-ionomer cement sandwich technique. International Dentistry South Africa 8 (2006) 6-10
24. Bayindir Y.Z., Bayindir F., and Akyil S.M. Bond strength of permanent cements in cementing cast to crown different core build-up materials. Dental Materials Journal 23 (2004) 117-120
25. Farrrell C.V., Johnson G.H., Oswald M.T., and Tucker R.D. Effect of cement selection and finishing technique on marginal opening of cast gold inlays. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 99 (2008) 287-292
26. Johnson G.H., Hazelton L.R., Bales D.J., and Lepe X. The effect of a resin-based sealer on crown retention for three types of cement. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 91 (2004) 428-435
27. Youn Y.A., Lee Y.K., Lee D.Y., Kim N.Y., and Lim Y.K. Effect of surface treatment and type of cement on the retentive strength of orthodontic bands on gold alloy crowns. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 132 (2007) 728. e1-6
28. De Munck J., Van Landuyt K., Peumans M., Poitevin A., Lambrechts P., Braem M., et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. Journal of Dental Research 84 (2005) 118-132
29. Hickel R., Manhart J., and García-Godoy F. Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations. American Journal of Dentistry 13 (2000) 41D-54D
30. Manhart J., García-Godoy F., and Hickel R. Direct posterior restorations: clinical results and new developments. Dental Clinics of North America 46 (2002) 303-339
31. Hickel R., and Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 3 (2001) 45-64
32. Hickel R., Kaaden C., Paschos E., Buerkle V., García-Godoy F., and Manhart J. Longevity of occlusally-stressed restorations in posterior primary teeth. American Journal of Dentistry 18 (2005) 198-211
33. Manhart J., Chen H., Hamm G., and Hickel R. Buonocore memorial lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Operative Dentistry 29 (2004) 481-508
34. Owens B.M., and Johnson W.W. Effect of new generation surface sealants on the marginal permeability of class V resin composite restorations. Operative Dentistry 31 (2006) 481-488
35. Mazzaoui S.A., Burrow M.F., and Tyas M.J. Fluoride release from glass ionomer cements and resin composites coated with a dentin adhesive. Dental Materials 16 (2000) 166-171
36. Castro G.W., Gray S.E., Buikema D.J., and Reagan S.E. The effect of various surface coatings on fluoride release from glass-ionomer cement. Operative Dentistry 19 (1994) 194-198
37. Bayne S.C., Thompson J.Y., Swift E.J., Stamatiades P., and Wilkerson M. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. Journal of the American Dental Association 129 (1998) 567-577
38. Frankenberger R., Lopes M., Perdigão J., Ambrose W.W., and Rosa B.T. The use of flowable composites as filled adhesives. Dental Materials 18 (2002) 227-238
39. Yip H.K., Tay F.R., Ngo H.C., Smales R.J., and Pashley D.H. Bonding of contemporary glass ionomer cements to dentin. Dental Materials 17 (2001) 456-470
40. Knight G.M., McIntyre J.M., Craig G.G., Mulyani, Zilm P.S., and Gully N.J. An in vitro investigation of marginal dentine caries abutting composite resin and glass ionomer cement restorations. Australian Dental Journal 52 (2007) 187-192
41. Castro A., and Feigal R.E. Microleakage of a new improved glass ionomer restorative material in primary and permanent teeth. Pediatric Dentistry 24 (2002) 23-28
42. Atash R., Bottenberg P., Petein M., and Vanden Abbeele A. In vitro evaluation of the marginal seal of four restoration materials on deciduous molars. Bulletin du Groupement International Pour la Recherche Scientifique en Stomatologie et Odontologie 45 (2003) 34-41
43. Wadenya R., and Mante F.K. An in vitro comparison of marginal microleakage of alternative restorative treatment and conventional glass ionomer restorations in extracted permanent molars. Pediatric Dentistry 29 (2007) 303-307
44. Irie M., Tjandrawinata R., and Suzuki K. Effect of delayed polishing periods on interfacial gap formation of class V restorations. Operative Dentistry 28 (2003) 552-559
45. Koupis N.S., Marks L.A., Verbeeck R.M., and Martens L.C. Review: finishing and polishing procedures of (resin-modified) glass ionomers and compomers in paediatric dentistry. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry 8 (2007) 22-28