An in vitro comparison of marginal microleakage of alternative restorative treatment and conventional glass lonomer restorations in extracted permanent molars

Pediatric Dentistry

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 303-307

  Wadenya, Rose ^a   Mante, F K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Atraumatic restorative treatment; Dentin margins; Enamel margins; Glass ionomer; Microleakage

Indexed keywords

GLASS IONOMER;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MOLAR TOOTH; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH DISEASE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL HIGH-SPEED TECHNIQUE; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MOLAR; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TOOTH CERVIX;

EID: 35348887795     PISSN: 01641263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Frencken JE, Songpaisan Y, Phantumvanit P, Pilot T. Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique: Evaluation after one year. Int Dent J 1994;44:460-4.
2. Cole BOI, Welbury RR. The atraumatic restorative treatment technique: Does it have a place in everyday practice? Dent Update 2000;27:118-23.
3. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry: Policy on alternative restorative treatment (ART). Reference Manual 2006-07. Pediatr Dent 2006;25:33.
4. Frencken JE, Pilot T, Songpaisan Y, Phantumvanit P. Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique: Rationale, technique, and development. J Public Health Dent 1996;56:135-40.
5. Wilson AD, McLean JW. Glass Ionomer Cement. Chicago, Ill: Quintessence; 1988:107-13.
6. Retief DH, Bradley EL, Denton JC, Switzer P. Enamel and cementum fluoride uptake from a glass ionomer cement. Caries Res 1994;18:250-7.
7. Habitovic-Kofman S, Koch G. Fluoride release from glass ionomer cement in vivo and in vitro. Swed Dent J
8. Forsten L. Fluoride release and uptake by glass ionomers and related materials and its clinical effect. Biomaterials 1998;19:503-8.
9. Hume WR, Mount GC. In vitro studies on the potential for pulpal cytotoxicity of glass ionomer cements. J Dent Res 1988;67:1854-61.
10. Bapna MS, Gadia CM, Drummond JL. Effects of aging and cyclic loading on the mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements. Eur J Oral Sci 2002;110:330-4.
11. Ewoldsen N, Covey D, Lavin M. The physical and adhesive properties of dental cements used for atraumatic restorative treatment. Spec Care Dentist 1997;17:19-24.
12. Luo Y, Wei SH, Fan MW, Lo EC. Clinical investigation of a high-strength glass ionomer restorative used with the ART technique in Wuhan, China: 1-year results. J Clin Dent 1999;2:73-8.
13. Frencken JE, Makoni F, Sithole WD. ART restorations and glass ionomer sealant in Zimbabwe: Survival after 3 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1998;26:372-81.
14. Frencken JE, Makoni F, Sithole WD, Hackenitz E. Three-year survival of one-surface ART restorations and glass ionomer sealants in a school oral health programme in Zimbabwe. Caries Res 1998;32:119-26.
15. Mallow PK, Durward CS, Klaipo M. Restoration of permanent teeth in young rural children in Cambodia using the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique and Fuji II glass ionomer cement. Int J Paediatr Dent 1998;8:35-40.
16. Holmgren CJ, Lo EC, Hu D, Wan H. ART restorations and sealants placed in Chinese school children: Results after three years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2000;28:314-20.
17. Frenken JE, Holmgren CJ. How effective is ART in the management of dental caries? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1999;27:423-30.
18. Nelsen RJ, Wolcott RB, Paffenbarger GC. Fluid exchange at the margins of dental restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1952;44:288-95.
19. Mount GJ. Glass ionomer cements and future research. Am J Dent 1994;7:286-92.
20. Walton R. Microleakage of restorative materials. Oper Dent 1987;12:138-9.
21. Ben-Amar A. A microleakage of composite resin restorations. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent 1989;2:175-80.
22. Bergenholtz G, Cox CF, Loesche WJ, Syed SA. Bacterial leakage around dental restorations: Its effect on the dental pulp. J Oral Pathol 1982;11:439-50.
23. Saltzberg DS, Ceravolo FJ, Holstein F, Groom G, Gottsegen R. Scanning electron microscope study of the junction between restorations and gingival cavosurface margins. J Prosthet Dent 1976;36:517-22.
24. Youngson CC, Grey NJA. An in vitro comparative analysis : Scanning electron microscopy of dentin/restoration interface. Dent Mater 1992;8:252-8.
25. Lin A, McIntyre NS, Davidson RD. Studies on the adhesion of glass-ionomer cements to dentin. J Dent Res 1992;7:1836-41.
26. Thornton JB, Retief DH, Bradkey EL. Marginal leakage of two glass-ionomer cements: Ketac-fil and ketac-silver. Am J Dent 1992;1:35-8.
27. Yap AUJ, Lim CC, Neo JCL. Marginal sealing ability of three cervical restorative systems. Quintessence Int 1995;26:817-20.
28. Mitra SB, Conway WT. Coefficient of thermal expansion of some methacrylate-modified glass-ionomers. J Dent Res 1994;73:219-23.
29. Pucket AD, Fitchie JG, Bennet B, Hembree JH. Microleakage and thermal properties of hybrid ionomer restoratives. Quintessence Int 1995;26:577-81.
30. Litkowski LJ, McDonald NJ, Swierczewski M. A comparison of thermocycling methods for evaluating microleakage. Abstract no. 208. J Dent Res 1989;68:207.
31. Loiselle RJ, Goldberg AP, Gross RL, et al. Marginal microleakage: An in vivo assessment. J Am Dent Assoc 1969;78:758-60.
32. Duangthip D, Lussi A. Microleakage and penetration ability of resin sealant vs bonding system when applied following contamination. Pediatr Dent 2003;25:505-11.
33. de Morais PM, Rodrigues Junior AL, Pimenta LA. Quantitative microleakage evaluation around amalgam restorations with different treatment on cavity walls. Oper Dent 1999;24:217-22.
34. Barnes DM, Thompson VP, Blank LW, et al. Microleakage of Class V composite resin restorations: A comparison between in vivo and in vitro. Oper Dent 1993;18:237-45.
35. Castro A, Feigal RE. Microleakage of a new improved glass ionomer restorative material in primary and permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent 2002;24:23-8.