Restoring proximal lesions in the primary dentition: Is glass ionomer cement the material of choice?

New Zealand Dental Journal

Volumn 99, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 65-71

  Scott, Juliette M ^a   Mahoney, Erin K ^a  

^a Westmead Centre for Oral Health   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CEMENT; FLUORIDE; RESIN;

DENTAL CARIES; DENTISTRY; DENTITION; HUMAN; MOLAR TOOTH; REVIEW; TOOTH EXTRACTION;

CHILD; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MOLAR; TOOTH, DECIDUOUS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 3442883040     PISSN: 00288047     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Andersson-Wenckert IE, van Dijken JW, and Stenberg R (1995). Effect of cavity form on the durability of glass ionomer cement restorations in primary teeth: a three-year clinical evaluation. ASDC Journal of Dentistry for Children 62: 197-200.
2. Anusavice KJ (1999). Does ART have a place in preservative dentistry? Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 27: 442-448.
3. Attwood D, Reid JS, and Evans D (1994). Assessment of Glass Polyalkenoate Restorations in Primary Molar Teeth. European Journal of Prosthetics and Restorative Dentistry 2: 183-185.
4. Berg JH (1998). The continuum of restorative materials in pediatric dentistry - a review for the clinician. Pediatric Dentistry 20: 93-100.
5. Burke FJT, Fleming GJP, Owen FJ, and Watson DJ (2002). Materials for restoration of primary teeth: 2. Glass Ionomer Derivatives and Compomers. Dental Update 29: 10-17.
6. Cameron A and Widmer R (1997). Dental caries and restorative paediatric dentistry. In Pediatric Dentistry. London: Mosby (pages 55-82).
7. Combe EC, Burke FJT, and Douglas WH (1999). Dental Biomaterials. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers (pages 221-231).
8. Croll TP, Bar-Zion Y, Segura A, and Donly KJ (2001). Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary teeth. Journal of the American Dental Association 132: 1110-1116.
9. Croll TP and Killian CM (1993). Glass-ionomer-resin restoration of primary molars with adjacent Class II carious lesions. Quintessence International 24: 723-727.
10. Davies MJ, Spencer AJ, and Slade GD (1997). Trends in dental caries experience of school children in Australia - 1977-1993. Australian Dental Journal 42: 389-394.
11. Donly KJ, Segura A, Kanellis M, and Erickson RL (1999a). Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations. Journal of the American Dental Association 130: 1459-1466.
12. Donly KJ, Segura A, Wefel JS, and Hogan MM (1999b). Evaluating the effects of fluoride-releasing dental materials on adjacent interproximal caries. Journal of the American Dental Association 130: 817-825.
13. Dunne SM, Golnik JS, Millar BJ, and Seddon RP (1996). Caries inhibition by a resin-modified and a conventional glass ionomer cement, in vitro. Journal of Dentistry 24: 91-94.
14. Einwag J and Dünninger P (1996). Stainless steel crown versus multisurface amalgam restorations: An 8-year longitudinal clinical study. Quintessence International 27: 321-323.
15. Espelid I, Tveit AB, Tornes KH, and Alvheim H (1999). Clinical behaviour of glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth. Journal of Dentistry 27: 437-442.
16. Fayle SA, Welbury RR, and Roberts JF (2001). British Society of Paediatric Dentistry: a policy document on management of caries in the primary dentition. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 11: 153-157.
17. Fleming GJP, Burke FJT, Watson DJ, and Owen FJ (2001). Materials for restoration of Primary Teeth: 1. Conventional Materials and early Glass Ionomers. Dental Update 486-491.
18. Frencken JE, Songpaisan Y, Phantumvanit P, and Pilot T (1994). An atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique: evaluation after 1 year. International Dental Journal 44: 460-464.
19. Gross LC, Griffen AL, and Casamassimo PS (2000). Compomers as class II restorations in primary molars. Pediatric Dentistry 23: 24-27.
20. Guelmann M, Mjör IA, and Jerrell GR (2001). The teaching of Class I and II restorations in primary molars: a survey of North American dental schools. Pediatric Dentistry 23: 410-414.
21. Hse KMY, Leung SK, and Wei SHY (1999). Resin-ionomer restorative materials for children: A review. Australian Dental Journal 44: 1-11.
22. Jang KT, Garcia-Godoy F, Donly KJ, and Segura A (2001). Remineralizing effects of glass ionomer restorations on adjacent interproximal caries. ASDC Journal of Dentistry for Children 68(2): 125-8, 142.
23. Johnsen DC (1987). Comparison of primary and permanent teeth. In Avery JK (Editor). Oral Development and Histology. Philadelphia: BC Becker (pages 180-190).
24. Kilpatrick NM (1993). Durability of restorations in primary molars. Journal of Dentistry 21: 67-73.
25. Kilpatrick NM, Murray JJ, and McCabe JF (1995). The use of a reinforced glass-ionomer cermet for the restoration of primary molars: a clinical trial. British Dental Journal 179 (5): 175-179.
26. Kilpatrick NM (1996a). Glass Ionomer Cements: Their Application in Children, Part 1. Dental Update 236-238.
27. Kilpatrick NM (1996b). Glass Ionomer Cements: Their Application in Children, Part 2. Dental Update 288-294.
28. Levering NJ and Messer LB (1988). The durability of primary molar restorations: I. Observations and predictions of success of amalgams. Pediatric Dentistry 10: 74-85.
29. Marks LA, van Amerongen WE, Borgmeijer PJ, Groen HJ, and Martens LC (2000). Ketac Molar Versus Dyract Class II restorations in primary molars: twelve month clinical results. ASDC Journal of Dentistry for Children 67: 37-41.
30. Messer LB and Levering NJ (1988). The durability of primary molar restorations: II. Observations and predictions of success of stainless steel crowns. Pediatric Dentistry 10: 81-85.
31. Myers DR (1977). Factors producing failure of class II silver amalgam restorations in primary molars. ASDC Journal of Dentistry for Children 44: 226-229.
32. Östlund J, Möller K, and Koch G (1992). Amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer cement in class II restorations in primary molars - a three year clinical evaluation. Swedish Dental Journal 16: 81-86.
33. Page J and Welbury RR (1997). Operative treatment of dental caries. In Paediatric Dentistry. Oxford (pages 115-138).
34. Papathanasiou AG, Curzon MEJ, and Fairpo CG (1994). The influence of restorative material on the survival rate of restorations in primary molars. Pediatric Dentistry 16: 282-288.
35. Qvist V, Laurberg L, Poulsen A, and Teglers PT (1997). Longevity and cariostatic effects of everyday conventional glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth: Three-year results. Journal of Dental Research 76: 1387-1396.
36. Randall RC, Vrijhoef MMA, and Wilson NHF (2000). Efficacy of preformed metal crowns vs. amalgam restorations in primary molars: A systematic review. Journal of the American Dental Association 131: 337-343.
37. Rugg-Gunn AJ (2001). Preventing the preventable - the enigma of dental caries. British Dental Journal 2001: 478-488.
38. Rugg-Gunn AJ, Welbury RR, and Toumba J (2001). British Society of Paediatric Dentistry: a policy document on the use of amalgam in paediatric dentistry. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 11: 233-238.
39. Rutar J, McAllan L, and Tyas MJ (2002). Three-year clinical performance of glass ionomer cement in primary molars. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 12(2): 146-147.
40. Spencer AJ, Szuster FSP, and Brennan DS (1994). Service-mix provided to patients in Australian private practice. Australian Dental Journal 39: 316-320.
41. Svanberg M, Mjör IA, and Orstavik D (1990). Mutans streptococci in plaque from margins of amalgam, composite and glass ionomer restorations. Journal of Dental Research 69: 861-864.
42. Thomson WM, Stewart JF, Carter KD, and Spencer AJ (1997). The Australian public's perception of mercury risk from dental restorations. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 25: 391-395.
43. Tyas MJ (1991). Cariostatic effect of glass ionomer cement: A five-year clinical study. Australian Dental Journal 36: 236-239.
44. Walls AWG, Murray JJ, and McCabe JF (1988). The use of glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cements in the deciduous dentition. British Dental Journal 165: 13-17.
45. Weerheijm KL and Groen HJ (1999). The residual caries dilemma. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 27: 436-441.
46. Welbury RR, Shaw AJ, Murray JJ, Gordon PH, and McCabe JF (2000). Clinical evaluation of paired compomer and glass ionomer restorations in primary molars: final results after 42 months. British Dental Journal 189: 93-97.
47. Welbury RR, Walls AWG, Murray JJ, and McCabe JF (1991). The 5-year results of a clinical trial comparing a glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement restoration with an amalgam restoration. British Dental Journal 170: 177-181.
48. Wilson AD and Kent BE ( 1972). A new translucent cement for dentistry. The glass ionomer cement. British Dental Journal 132: 133-135.
49. Xie D, Brantley WA, Culbertson BM, and Wang G (2000). Mechanical properties and microstructures of glass-ionomer cements. Dental Materials 16: 129-138.
50. Yip KH-K, Smales RJ, and Peng D (2002). The effects of two cavity preparation methods on the longevity of glass ionomer cement restorations. Journal of the American Dental Association 133: 744-751.