Effects of visual cues and sustained attention on spatial presence in virtual environments based on spatial and object distinction

Interacting with Computers

Volumn 20, Issue 4-5, 2008, Pages 491-502

  Lee, Sungkil ^a   Kim, Gerard Jounghyun ^b  

^a Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH)   (South Korea)

^b Korea University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Object vision; Spatial presence; Spatial vision; Sustained attention; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; VIRTUAL REALITY;

EXPOSURE-TIME; FUNCTIONAL SUBSYSTEMS; POSITIVE INTERACTION; SPATIAL ATTENTION; SPATIAL CUES; SPATIAL PRESENCE; SPATIAL VISION; SUSTAINED ATTENTION;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 53349164119     PISSN: 09535438     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.intcom.2008.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Ackerman P.L. Determinants of individual difference during skill acquisition: cognitive abilities and information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 117 3 (1988) 288-318
2. Aguirre G.K., and D'Esposito M. Environmental knowledge is surserved by separable dorsa/ventral neural areas. The Journal of Neuroscience 17 7 (1997) 2512-2518
3. Alcañiz, M., Baños, R., Botella, C., Cottone, P., Freeman, J., Gaggioli, A., Keogh, E., Mantovani, F., Mantovani, G., Montesa, J., Perpiñá, C., Rey, B., Riva, G., Waterworth, J., 2002. The EMMA project: engaging media for mental health applications, presented at Presence 2002.
4. Baumgartner T., Valko L., Esslen M., and Jäncke L. Neural correlate of spatial presence in an arousing and noninteractive virtual reality: an EEG and psychophysiology study. CyberPsychology & Behavior 9 (2006) 30-45
5. Braddick O.J., O'Brian J.M., Wattam-Bell J., Atkinson J., Hartley T., and Turner R. Brain areas sensitive to visual motion. Perception 30 (2001) 61-72
6. Bystrom K., Barfield W., and Hendrix C. A conceptual model of the sense of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 8 (1999) 241-244
7. Creem S.H., and Proffitt D.R. Defining the cortical visual systems: "What", "Where", and "How". Acta Psychologica 107 (2001) 43-68
8. Cutting J.E., and Vishton P.M. Perceiving layout and knowing distances: the integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. In: Epstein W., and Rogers S. (Eds). Handbook of Perception and Cognition (1995), Academic Press, CA 69-117
9. DeAngelis G., and Newsome W. Organization of disparity-selective neurons in macaque area MT of the macaque. Journal of Neuroscience 19 (1999) 1398-1415
10. D'Esposito M., Aguirre G.K., Zarahn E., Ballard D., Shin R.K., and Lease J. Functional MRI studies of spatial and nonspatial working memory. Cognitive Brain Research 7 1 (1998) 1-13
11. Deubel H., Schneider W.X., and Paprotta I. Selective dorsal and ventral processing: evidence for a common attentional mechanism in reaching and perception. Visual Cognition 5 (1998) 81-107
12. Draper J.V., Kaber D.B., and Usher J.M. Speculations on the value of telepresence. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2 (1999) 349-362
13. Dubner R., and Zeki S. Response properties and receptive fields of cells in an anatomically defined region of the superior temporal sulcus in the monkey. Brain Research 35 (1971) 528-532
14. Duhamel J.R., Corby C.L., and Goldberg M.E. The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements. Science 255 (1992) 90-92
15. Engel S., Zhang X., and Wandell B. Colour tuning in human visual cortex measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Nature 388 6637 (1997) 68-71
16. Epstein R., and Kanwisher N. A cortical representations of the local visual environment. Nature 392 (1998) 598-601
17. Garau, M., Widenfeld, H.R., Antley, A., Friedman, D., Brogni, A., Slater, M., 2004. Temporal and spatial variation in presence: a qualitative analysis. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Presence. pp. 232-239.
18. Gerhard, M., Moore, D., Hobbs, D., 2001. Continuous presence in collaborative virtual environments: towards the evaluation of hybrid avatar-agent model for user representation. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents. pp. 137-155.
19. Heeter C. Being there: the subjective experience of presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 1 (1992) 262-271
20. Heeter C. Reflections on real presence by a virtual person. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 12 4 (2003) 335-345
21. Hendrix C., and Barfield W. Presence within virtual environments as a function of visual display parameters. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 53 (1996) 274-289
22. Hofmann J., and Bubb H. Presence in industrial virtual environment applications - susceptibility and measurement reliability. In: Riva G., Davidef F., and Ijsselsteijn W.A. (Eds). Being There: Concepts, Effects and Measurement of User Presence in Synthetic Environments (2003), Ios Press 237-246
23. Hofmann, J., Jäger, T., D., Bubb, H., 2001. Effects of presence on spatial perception in virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Presence. pp. 1-16.
24. Ijsselsteijn W., de Ridder H., Freeman J., Avons S.E., and Bouwhuis D. Effects of stereoscopic presentation, image motion, and screen size on subjective and objective corroborative measures of presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 10 (2001) 298-311
25. Ijsselsteijn W., and Riva G. Being there: the experience of presence in mediated environments. In: Riva G., Davide F., and Ijsselsteijn W.A. (Eds). Being There: Concepts, Effects and Measurement of User Presence in Synthetic Environments (2003), Ios Press 3-16
26. Ijsselsteijn W.A., and de Ridder H. Perceived depth and the feeling of presence in 3DTV. Displays 18 (1998) 207-214
27. Kayaert G., Biederman I., de Beeck H.P.O., and Vongels R. Tuning for shape dimensions in macaque inferior temporal cortex. European Journal of Neuroscience 22 (2005) 212-224
28. Kersten D., Mamassian P., and Knill D.C. Moving cast shadows induce apparent motion in depth. Perception 26 (1997) 171-192
29. Klippel, A., Winter, S., 2005. Structural salience of landmarks for route directions. In: Proceedings of Spatial Information Theory, International Conference, COSIT. pp. 347-362.
30. LaBerge D., and Brown V. Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. Psychological Review 96 (1989) 101-124
31. Lee P.U., and Tversky B. Interplay between visual and spatial: the effect of landmark descriptions on comprehension of route/survey spatial descriptions. Spatial Cognition and Computation 5 2 & 3 (2005) 163-185
32. Lessiter J., Freeman J., Keogh E., and Davidoff J. A cross-media presence questionnaire: the ITC-sense of presence inventory. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 10 (2001) 282-297
33. Lombard M., and Ditton T. At the heart of it all: the concept of presence. Journal of Computer Mediated-Communication 3 (1997)
34. Mazard A., Tzourio-Mazoyer N., Crivello F., Mazoyer B., and Mellet E. A PET meta-analysis of object and spatial mental imagery. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 16 5 (2004) 673-695
35. Michie P.T., Karayanidis F., Smith G.L., Barrett N.A., Large M.M., O'Sullivan B.T., and Kavanagh D.J. An exploration of varieties of visual attention: ERP findings. Cognitive Brain Research 7 (1999) 419-450
36. Milner A.D., and Goodale M.A. The Visual Brain in Action (1995), Oxford University Press
37. Mishkin M., Unterleider L.G., and Macko K.A. Object vision and spatial vision: two cortical pathways. Trends in Neurosciences 6 (1983) 414-417
38. Oman C.M. Sensory conflict theory and space sickness: our changing perspective. Journal of Vestibular Research 8 1 (1998) 51-56
39. Pasupathy A., and Connor C.E. Shape representation in area V4: position-specific tuning for boundary confirmation. Neurophysiology 86 (2001) 2505-2519
40. Posner M.I., and Petersen S.E. The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience 13 (1990) 25-42
41. Reason J.T. Motion sickness adaptation: a neural mismatch model. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 71 (1978) 819-829
42. Regenbrecht H., and Schubert T. Real and illusory interactions enhance presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 11 (2002) 425-434
43. Ruddle R.A. Navigation: am I really lost or virtually there?. In: Harris D. (Ed). Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics vol. 6 (2001), Ashgate Publishing 135-142
44. Ruddle R.A., Payne S.J., and Jones D.M. Navigating large-scale desk-top virtual buildings: effects of orientation aids and familiarity. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 7 (1998) 179-192
45. Sarter M., Givens B., and Bruno J.P. The cognitive neuroscience of sustained attention: where top-down meets bottom-up. Brain Research Reviews 35 (2001) 146-160
46. ®. http://www.sas.com/.
47. Schneider W.X. VAM: a neuron-cognitive model for visual attention control of segmentation, object recognition, and space-based motor action. Visual Cognition 2 (1995) 331-375
48. Schubert T., Friedmann F., and Regenbrecht H. Embodied presence in virtual environments. In: Paton R., and Neilson I. (Eds). Visual Representations and Interpretations (1999), Springer-Verlag, London 269-278
49. Shim W., and Kim G.J. Designing for presence and performance: the case of the virtual fish tank. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 12 (2003) 374-386
50. Shimojo S., and Shams L. Sensory modalities are not separate modalities: plasticity and interactions. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 11 (2001) 505-509
51. Siegel A.W., and White S.H. The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. In: Reese H. (Ed). Advances in Child Development and Behavior (1975), Academic Press, New York 10-55
52. Slater M., and Steed A. A virtual presence counter. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 9 3 (2000) 413-434
53. Slater, M., Usoh, M., Chrysanthou, Y., 1995. The influence of dynamic shadows on presence in immersive virtual environments. In: Proceedings of Virtual Environments, Eurographics. pp. 8-21.
54. Smeets J., Brenner E., de Grave D., and Cuijpers R. Illusions in action: consequences of inconsistent processing of spatial attributes. Experimental Brain Research 147 (2002) 135-144
55. Stanney K., Salvendy G., Deisinger J., DiZio P., Ellis S., Ellison J., Fogleman G., Gallimore J., Singer M., Hettinger L., Kennedy R., Lackner J., Lawson B., Maida J., Mead A., Mon-Williams M., Newman D., Piantanida T., Reeves L., Riedel O., Stoffregen T., Wann J., Welch R., Wilson J., and Witmer B. Aftereffects and sense of presence in virtual environments: formulation of a research and development agenda. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 10 (1998) 135-187
56. Thorndyke P.W., and Hayesa R.B. Spatial cognition and reasoning. Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation. Cognitive Psychology 14 (1982) 560-589
57. Treisman A.M., and Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology 12 (1980) 97-136
58. Treisman A.M., and Gormican S. Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review 95 (1988) 15-48
59. Usoh M., Catena E., Arman S., and Slater M. Using presence questionnaires in reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 9 (2000) 497-503
60. Vidyasagar T.R., and Pammer K. Impaired visual search in dyslexia relates to the role of the magnocellular pathway in attention. Neuroreport 26 (1999) 1283-1287
61. von Bertalanffy L. A quantitative theory of organic growth (inquiries on growth laws. ii). Human Biology 10 (1938) 181-213
62. von der Heyde, M., Riecke, B.E., 2002. Embedding presence-related terminology in a logical and functional model. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Presence. pp. 37-52.
63. Waller D., Hunt E., and Knapp D. The transfer of spatial knowledge in virtual environment training. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 7 (1998) 129-143
64. Waterworth J., and Waterworth E. Focus, locus and sensus: the 3 dimensions of virtual experience. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 4 (2001) 203-214
65. Welch R.B. How can we determine if the sense of presence affects task performance?. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 8 5 (1999) 574-577
66. Welch R.B., Blackman T.T., Liu A., Mellers B.A., and Stark L.W. The effects of pictorial realism, delay of visual feedback, and observer interactivity on the subjective sense of presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 5 (1996) 263-273
67. Witmer B.G., and Singer M.M. Measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 7 (1998) 225-240
68. Yardley L. Motion sickness susceptibility and the utilisation of visual and otolithic information for orientation. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 247 (1990) 300-304
69. Yonas A., Goldsmith L.T., and Hallstrom J.L. Development of sensitivity to information provided by cast shadows in pictures. Perception 7 (1978) 333-341
70. Zhao S. "Being there" and the role of presence technology. In: Riva G., Davide F., and Ijsselsteijn W.A. (Eds). Being There: Concepts Effects and Measurement of User Presence in Synthetic Environments (2003), Ios Press 137-146