Re: Guyton, Kathryn Z., Barone, Stanley, Jr., Brown, Rebecca C., Euling, Susan Y., Jinot, Jennifer, Makris, Susan (2008). Mode of action frameworks: A critical analysis. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B, 11(1): 16-31

Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health - Part B: Critical Reviews

Volumn 11, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 681-685

  Meek, M E ^a   Berry, Colin ^b   Boobis, Alan R ^c   Cohen, Samuel M ^d   Hartley, Margaret ^e   Munn, Sharon ^f   Olin, Stephen ^g   Schlatter, Josef ^h   Vickers, Carolyn ⁱ  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e Department of Health and Ageing ^*  (Australia)

^f EUROPEAN CHEMICALS AGENCY   (Finland)

^g International Life Sciences Institute   (United States)

^h FEDERAL OFFICE OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (Switzerland)

ⁱ WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; HEALTH HAZARD; LETTER; MEDICAL EXPERT; MEDICAL SOCIETY; METHODOLOGY; RISK ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL PRACTICE; INFORMATION PROCESSING;

EID: 52949113875     PISSN: 10937404     EISSN: 15216950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10937400801985648     Document Type: Letter

References (22)

1. Boobis, A. R., Cohen, S. M., Dellarco, V., McGregor, D., Meek, M. E., Vickers, C., Willcocks, D., and Farland, W. 2006. IPCS framework for analyzing the relevance of a cancer mode of action for humans. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 36:781-792.
2. Boobis, A. R., Doe, J. E., Heinrich-Hirsch, B., Meek, M. E., Munn, S., Ruchirawat, M., Schlatter, J., Seed, J., and Vickers, C. 2008. IPCS framework for analysing the relevance of a non-cancer mode of action for humans. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 38:87-96.
3. Committee on Carcinogenicity. 2004. Guidance on a strategy for the risk assessment of chemical carcinogens. London: United Kingdom, Department of Health.
4. Dellarco, V. L., and Baetcke, K. 2005. A risk assessment perspective: application of mode of action and human relevance frameworks to the analysis of rodent tumor data. Toxicol. Sci. 86:1-3.
5. EFSA. 2006. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Health, Plant protection products and their Residues on the scientific principles in the assessment and guidance provided in the field of human toxicology between 2003 and 2006. EFSA J. 346:1-13.
6. European Commission. 2003. Technical guidance document on risk assessment. European Commission Joint Research Centre, Italy, EUR 20418 EN/1.
7. Green, T., Toghill, A., Lee, R., Waechter, F., Weber, E., Peffer, R., Noakes, J., and Robinson, M. 2005. Thiamethoxam induced mouse liver tumors and their relevance to humans. Part 2: Species differences in response. Toxicol. Sci., 86:48-55.
8. Guyton, K. Z., Barone, S., Brown, R. C., Euling, S. Y., Jinot, J., and Makris, S. 2008. Mode of action frameworks: A critical analysis. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health B 11(1):16-31.
9. IPCS. 2006. Concise international chemical assessment document 68: Tetrachloroethylene. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Programme on Chemical Safety.
10. JMPR. 2006. Report of the Joint Meeting of the FAO Panel of Experts on Pesticide Residues in Food and the Environment and WHO the Core Assessment Group. FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper 187 (Thiacloprid). http://www.fao.org/ag/AGP/AGPP/Pesticid/JMPR/JMPRreports.htm
11. Liteplo, R. G., and Meek, M. E. 2003. Inhaled formaldehyde: Exposure estimation, hazard characterization and exposure-response analysis. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health B 6:85-114.
12. Meek, M. E., Bucher, J. R., Cohen, S. M., Dellarco, V., Hill, R. N., Lehman-McKeeman, L. D., Longfellow, D. G., Pastoor, T., Seed, J., and Patton, D. E. 2003. A framework for human relevance analysis of information on carcinogenic modes of action. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 33:591-653.
13. NICNAS. 2006. Priority existing chemical assessment report 21: Benzene. National Industrial Chemical Notification and Assessment Scheme, Commonwealth of Australia. http://www.nicnas.gov.au/Publications/CAR/PEC/PEC21/ PEC_21_Full_Report_PDF.pdf
14. OECD. 2002, Guidance notes for analysis and evaluation of chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity studies. OECD Series on Testing and Assessment No. 35 and Series on Pesticides No. 14 (ENV/JM/MONO(2002)19). Paris. http://www.olis.oecd.org/olis/2002doc.nsf/LinkTo/env-jm-mono(2002)19
15. Pastoor, T., Rose, P., Lloyd, S., Peffer, R., and Green, T. 2005. Case study: Weight of evidence evaluation of the human health relevance of thiamethoxam-related mouse liver tumors. Toxicol. Sci. 86:56-60.
16. SAB. 1999. Minutes of the Chloroform Risk Assessment Review Subcommittee Meeting; Minutes of the Chloroform Risk Assessment Review Subcommittee Meeting, October 27-28, 1999, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Science Advisory Board. http://yosemite.epa.gov/sab/sabproduct.nsf/ec0009.pdf
17. SAB. 2007. Subject: Advisory on EPA's Assessments of Carcinogenic Effects of Organic and Inorganic Arsenic: A Report of the US EPA Science Advisory Board. http://yosemite.epa.gov/sab/sabproduct.nsf/EPA-SAB-07-008.pdf
18. SAP. 2000. SAP Report No. 2000-05, FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel Meeting, June 27-29, 2000, Held at the Sheraton Crystal City Hotel, Arlington, Virginia: Atrazine: hazard and dose-response assessment and characterization. http://www.epa.gov/oscpmont/sap/meetings/2000/june27/finalatrazine.pdf
19. Seed, J., Carney, E. W., Corley, R. A., Crofton, K. M., DeSesso, J. M., Foster, P. M. D., Kavlock, R., Kimmel, G., Klaunig, J., Meek, M. E., Preston, R. J., Slikker, W., Jr., Tabacova, S., Williams, G. M., Wiltse, J., Zoeller, R. T., Fenner-Crisp, P. A., and Patton, D. E. 2005. Overview: Using mode of action and life stage information to evaluate the human relevance of animal toxicity data. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 35:663-672.
20. Sonich-Mullin, C., Fielder, R., Wiltse, J., Baetcke, K., Dempsey, J., Fenner-Crisp, P., Grant, D., Hartley, M., Knaap, A., Kroese, D., Mangelsdorf, I., Meek, M. E., Rice, J. M., and Younes, M. 2001. IPCS conceptual framework for evaluating a mode of action for chemical carcinogenesis. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 34:146-152.
21. UNECE. 2007. Amendments to the Globally Harmonized System of classification and labelling of chemicals (GHS). United Nations, Geneva. Document ST/SG/AC.10/34/Add.3 http://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ ghs_rev01/01amend_e.html
22. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2005. Science issue paper: Mode of carcinogenic action for cacodylic acid (dimethylarsinic acid, DMAV) and recommendations for dose response extrapolation. July 26. Health Effects Division, Office of Pesticide Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Program. http://www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/reregistration/cacodylic_acid/dma_moa.pdf