An analog investigation of the relationship between treatment acceptability and treatment integrity

Journal of Behavioral Education

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 39-50

  Sterling Turner, Heather E ^a,c   Steuart Watson, T ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI   (United States)

^b MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Department of Psychology ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Treatment acceptability; Treatment integrity

Indexed keywords

EID: 52649104820     PISSN: 10530819     EISSN: 15733513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1014333305011     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Allinder, R. M., & Oats, R. G. (1997). Effects of acceptability on teachers' implementation of curriculum-based measurement and student achievement in mathematics computation. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 113-120.
2. Bergan, J. R., & Kratochwill, T. R. (1990). Behavioral consultation and therapy. New York: Plenum.
3. Blampied, N. M., Kahan, E. (1992). Acceptability of alternative punishments: A community survey. Behavior Modification, 16, 400-413.
4. Cross-Calvert, S., & Johnston, C. ( 1990). Acceptability of treatment for child behavior problems: Issues and implications for future research. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 19, 61-74.
5. Elliott, S. N. (1988). Acceptability of behavioral treatments in educational settings. In J. C. Witt, S. N. Elliott, S. N., & F. M. Gresham (Eds.), Handbook of behavior therapy in education, (pp. 121-150). New York: Plenum Press.
6. Elliott, S. N., Witt, J. C., Galvin, G. A., & Peterson, R. (1984). Acceptability of positive and reductive behavioral interventions: Factors that influence teachers' decisions. Journal of School Psychology, 22, 353-360.
7. Erhardt. K. E., Barnett, D. W., Lentz, F. E., Stollar, S. A., & Reifin, L. H. (1996). Innovative methodology in ecological consultation: Use of scripts to promote treatment acceptability and integrity. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 149-168.
8. Freer, P. J., & Watson, T. S. (1999). A comparison of parent and teacher acceptability ratings of behavioral and conjoint behavioral consultation. School Psychology Review, 28, 672-683.
9. Frentz, C., & Kelley, M. L. (1986). Parents' acceptance of reductive treatment methods: The influence of problem severity and perception of child behavior. Behavior Therapy, 17, 75-81.
10. Galloway, J., & Sheridan, S. M. (1994). Implementing scientific practices through case studies: Examples using home-school interventions and consultation. Journal of School Psychology, 32, 385-413.
11. Gresham, F. M. (1989). Assessment of treatment integrity in school consultation and prereferral intervention. School Psychology Review, 18, 37-50.
12. Gresham, F. M., Gansle, K. A., & Noell, G. H. (1993). Treatment integrity in applied behavior analysis with children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 257-263.
13. Gresham, F. M., Gansle, K. A., Noell, G. H., Cohen, S., & Rosenblum, S. (1993). Treatment integrity of school-based behavioral intervention studies: 1980-1990. School Psychology Review, 22, 254272.
14. Hobbs, S. A., Walle, D. L., & Hammersly, G. A. (1993). The relationship between child behavior and acceptability of contingency management procedures. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 12, 95-102.
15. Kalfus, G. R., & Burk, B. K. (1989). The influence of case history and treatment mediator on ratings of acceptability of child treatment. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 11, 45-55.
16. Kazdin, A. E. (1980). Acceptability of alternative treatments for deviant child behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 259-273.
17. Kazdin, A. E. (1984). Acceptability of aversive procedures and mediation as treatment alternatives for deviant child behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 12, 289-302.
18. Kutsick, K. A., Gutkin, T. B., & Witt, J. C. (1991). The impact of treatment development process, intervention type, and problem severity on treatment acceptability as judged by classroom teachers. Psychology in the Schools, 28, 325-331.
19. Lentz, F. E., Alien, S. J., & Erhardt, K. E. (1996). The conceptual elements of strong interventions in school settings. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 118-136.
20. Lloyd, K. E. (1994). Do as I say, not as I do. Behavior Analyst, 17, 131-139.
21. Martens, B. K., Hiralall, A. S., & Bradley, T. A. (1997). A note to teacher: Improving student behavior through goal setting and feedback. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 33-41.
22. Martens, B. K., Witt, J. C., Elliott, S. N., & Darveaux, D. X. (1985). Teacher judgments concerning the acceptability of school-based interventions. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 16, 191-198.
23. Miller, D. L., & Kelley, M. L. (1992). Treatment acceptability: The effects of parent gender, marital adjustment, and child behavior. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 14, 11-23.
24. Nastasi, B. K., & Truscott, S. D. (2000). Acceptability research in school psychology [Special Issue]. School Psychology Quarterly, 15(2).
25. Noell, G. H., & Witt, J. C. (1996). A critical re-evaluation of five fundamental assumptions underlying behavioral consultation. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 189-203.
26. Peterson, L., Homer, A., & Wunderlich, S. (1982). The integrity of independent variables in behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 477-4192.
27. Quay, H. C., & Peterson, D. R. (1983). The revised problem behavior checklist. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami.
28. Reimers, T. M., & Wacker, D. P. (1988). Parents' ratings of the acceptability of behavioral treatment recommendations made in an outpatient clinic: A preliminary analysis of the influence of treatmen effectiveness. Behavioral Disorders, 14, 7-15.
29. Reimers, T. M., Wacker, D. P, & Cooper, L. J. (1991). Evaluation of the acceptability of treatments for children's behavioral difficulties: Ratings by parents receiving services in an outpatient clinic. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 13, 53-71.
30. Reimers, T. M., Wacker, D. P., Cooper, L. J., & DeRaad A. O. (1992). Acceptability of behavioral treatments for children: Analog and naturalistic evaluations by parents. School Psychology Review, 21, 628-643.
31. Reimers, T. M., Wacker, D. P, & Koeppl, G. (1987). Acceptability of behavioral treatments: A review of the literature. School Psychology Review, 16, 212-227.
32. Spreat, S., Lipinski, D., Dickerson, R., Nass, R., & Dorsey, M. (1989). A paramorphic representation of the acceptability of behavioral programming. Behavioral Residential Treatment, 4, 1-13.
33. Sterling-Turner, H. E., Watson, T. S., & Moore, J. M. (2000). The effects of direct training and treatment integrity on treatment outcomes in school consultation: Applications to direct behavioral consultation. Manuscript submitted for publication.
34. Sterling-Turner, H. E., Watson, T. S., Wildmon, M., Watkins, C., & Little, E. (2001). Investigating the relationship between training type and treatment integrity. School Psychology Quarterly, 16, 78-89.
35. Stevens, J. (1990). Intermediate statistics: A modern approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
36. Tingstrom, D. H. (1990). Acceptability of time-out: The influence of problem behavior severity, interventionist, and reported effectiveness. Journal of School Psychology, 28, 165-169.
37. Tingstrom, D. H., McPhail, R. L., & Bolton, A. B. (1989). Acceptability of alternative school-based interventions: The influence of reported effectiveness and age of target child. The Journal of Psychology, 123, 133-140.
38. Von Brock, M. B., & Elliott, S. N. (1987). Influence of treatment effectiveness information on the acceptability of classroom interventions. Journal of School Psychology, 25, 131-144.
39. Watson, T. S., & Kramer, J. J. (1995). Teaching problem solving skills to teachers-in-training: An analogue experimental analysis of three methods. Journal of Behavioral Education, 5, 281-293.
40. Watson, T. S., & Robinson, S. L. (1996). Direct behavioral consultation: An alternative approach to didactic consultation. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 267-278.
41. Watson, T. S., Sterling, H. E., & McDade, A. (1997). Demythifying behavioral consultation. School Psychology Review, 26, 467-4174.
42. Wickstrom, K. F., Jones, K. J., LaFleur, L. H., & Witt, J. C. (1998). An analysis of treatment integrity in school-based behavioral consultation. School Psychology Quarterly, 13, 141-154.
43. Witt, J. C., & Elliott, S. N. (1985). Acceptability of classroom management strategies. In T. R. Kratochwill (Eds.), Advances in school psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 251-288). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
44. Witt, J. C., Elliott, S. N., & Martens, B. K. (1984). Acceptability of behavioral interventions used in classrooms: The influence of teacher time, severity of behavior problems, and type of intervention. Behavior Disorders, 9, 95-104.
45. Witt, J. C., Gresham, F. M., & Noell, G. H. (1996). What's behavioral about behavioral consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 7, 327-344.
46. Witt, J. C., Martens, B. K., & Elliott, S. N. (1984). Factors affecting teachers' judgments of the acceptability of behavioral interventions: Time involvement, behavior problem severity, and type of intervention. Behavior Therapy, 15, 204-209.