Effects of stimulus manipulation on electrophysiological responses in pediatric cochlear implant users. Part I: Duration effects

Hearing Research

Volumn 244, Issue 1-2, 2008, Pages 7-14

  Davids, Taryn ^a,b   Valero, Jerome ^a   Papsin, Blake C ^a,b   Harrison, Robert V ^a,b   Gordon, Karen A ^a,b  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Behavioral thresholds; Cochlear implant; Duration of stimulation; Electrical stimulation; Electrophysiological thresholds

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; BRAIN STEM RESPONSE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; EVOKED MIDDLE LATENCY RESPONSE; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; NERVE POTENTIAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSED ELECTRIC FIELD; STIMULUS RESPONSE; THALAMOCORTICAL TRACT; WAVEFORM;

ADOLESCENT; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CHILD; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEURONS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 52249116779     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.06.011     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Abbas P.J., and Brown C.J. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response: growth of response with current level. Hear. Res. 51 1 (1991) 123-138
2. Abbas, P.J., Brown, C.J., 1993. Comparison of EAR, EABR and psychophysiological data from human cochlear implant users: level effects. In: Abst. Third Internat. Cochlear Implant Conf. 4-7 April, Innsbruck, Austria.
3. Alvarez I., de la Torre A., Sainz M., Roldan C., Schoesser H., and Spitzer P. Generalized alternating stimulation: a novel method to reduce stimulus artifact in electrically evoked compound action potentials. J. Neurosci. Meth. 165 1 (2007) 95-103
4. Brown C.J. Clinical uses of electrically evoked auditory nerve and brainstem responses. Curr. Opin. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 11 5 (2003) 383-387
5. Brown C.J., and Abbas P.J. Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: data from human cochlear implant users. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88 3 (1990) 1385-1391
6. Brown C.J., Abbas P.J., Fryauf-Bertschy H., Kelsay D., and Gantz B. Intra-operative and post-operative electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in nucleus cochlear implant users: implications for the fitting process. Ear Hear. 15 (1994) 168-176
7. Brown C.J., Hughes M.L., Lopez S.M., and Abbas P.J. Relationship between EABR thresholds and levels used to program the CLARION speech processor. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. Suppl. 177 (1999) 50-57
8. Brown C.J., Hughes M.L., Luk B., Abbas P.J., Wolaver A., and Gervais J. The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the nucleus 24 speech processor: data from adults. Ear Hear. 21 2 (2000) 151-163
9. Carlyon R.P., van Wieringen A., Deeks J.M., Long C.J., Lyzenga J., and Wouters J. Effect of inter-phase gap on the sensitivity of cochlear implant users to electrical stimulation. Hear Res. 205 (2005) 210-224
10. Davids T., Valero J., Papsin B.C., Harrison R.V., and Gordon K.A. Effects of stimulus manipulation on electrophysiological responses of pediatric cochlear implant users. Part II: Rate Effects. Hear. Res. 244 1-2 (2008) 15-24
11. Donaldson G.S., Veimeister N.F., and Nelson D.A. Psychometric functions and temporal integration in electric hearing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101 6 (1997) 3706-3721
12. Eisen M.D., and Franck K.H. Electrically evoked compound action potential amplitude growth functions and hiresolution programming levels in pediatric CII implant subjects. Ear Hear. 25 6 (2004) 528-538
13. Eisen M.D., and Franck K.H. Electrode interaction in pediatric cochlear implant subjects. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 6 2 (2005) 160-170
14. Firszt J.B., Rotz L.A., Chambers R.D., and Novak M.A. Electrically evoked potentials recorded in adult and pediatric CLARION implant users. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. Suppl. 177 (1999) 58-63
15. Firszt J.B., Chambers R.D., Kraus N., and Reeder R.M. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users I: effects of stimulus current level and electrode site on the electrical ABR, MLR, and N1-P2 response. Ear Hear. 23 6 (2002) 502-515
16. Gallego S., Garnier S., Micheyl C., Truy E., Morgon A., and Collet L. Loudness growth functions and EABR characteristics in Digisonic cochlear implantees. Acta. Otolaryngol. 119 2 (1999) 234-238
17. Gerken G.M., Bhat V.K.H., and Hutchinson-Clutter J.H. Auditory temporal integration and the power-function model. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88 (1990) 767-778
18. Gengel R.W., and Watson C.S. Temporal integration: I. Clinical implications of a laboratory study. II. Additional data from hearing impaired subjects. J. Speech Hear. Discord. 36 (1971) 213-244
19. Gordon K.A., Papsin B.C., and Harrison R.V. Activity-dependent developmental plasticity of the auditory brainstem in children who use cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 24 6 (2003) 485-500
20. Gordon K., Papsin B.C., and Harrison R.V. Programming cochlear implant stimulation levels in infants and children with a combination of objective measures. Int. J. Audiol. 43 Suppl. 1 (2004) S28-S32
21. Gordon K.A., Papsin B.C., and Harrison R.V. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children. Ear Hear. 25 (2004) 447-463
22. Gordon K.A., Papsin B.C., and Harrison R.V. Effects of cochlear implant use on the electrically evoked middle latency response in children. Hear. Res. 204 1-2 (2005) 78-89
23. Gordon K.A., Papsin B.C., and Harrison R.V. An evoked potential study of the developmental time course of the auditory nerve and brainstem in children using cochlear implants. Audiol. Neurotol. 11 1 (2006) 7-23
24. Gordon K.A., Papsin B.C., and Harrison R.V. Auditory brainstem activity and development evoked by apical versus basal cochlear implant electrode stimulation in children. Clin. Neurophysiol. 118 8 (2007) 1671-1684
25. Gorga M.P., and Thornton A.R. The choice of stimuli for ABR measurements. Ear Hear. 10 4 (1989) 217-230
26. Hughes M.L., Vander Werff K.R., Brown C.J., Abbas P.J., Kelsay D.M., Teagle H.F., and Lowder M.W. A longitudinal study of electrode impedance, the electrically evoked compound action potential, and behavioral measures in nucleus 24 cochlear implant users. Ear Hear. 22 6 (2001) 471-486
27. Kraus N., and McGee T. Clinical implications of primary and non-primary pathway contributions to the middle latency response generating system. Ear. Hear. 14 (1993) 36-48
28. Kraus N., and McGee T. The middle latency response generating system. Electroencephalog. Clin. Neurophysiol. Suppl. 44 (1995) 93-101
29. McKay C.M., and Henshall K.R. The perceptual effects of interphase gap duration in cochlear implant stimulation. Hear Res. 181 1-2 (2003) 94-99
30. Miller C.A., Abbas P.J., and Brown C.J. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response to stimulation of different sites in the cochlea. Hear. Res. 66 (1993) 130-142
31. Miller C.A., Abbas P.J., and Robinson B.K. Characterization of wave I of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response in the guinea pig. Hear Res. 69 1-2 (1993) 35-44
32. Miller C.A., Abbas P.J., Brown C.J., and Carolyn J. An improved method of reducing stimulus artifact in the electrically evoked whole-nerve potential. Ear Hear. 21 4 (2000) 280-290
33. Moon A.K., Zwolan T.A., and Pfingst B.E. Effects of phase duration on detection of electrical stimulation of the human cochlea. Hear. Res. 67 (1993) 166-178
34. Oates P., and Stapells D.R. Frequency specificity of the human auditory brainstem and middle latency responses to brief tones. I. High-pass noise masking. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102 6 (1997) 3597-3608
35. Plomp R., and Bouman M.A. Relation between hearing threshold and duration for tone pulses. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 31 (1959) 749-758
36. Pfingst B.E. Comparisons of psychophysical and neurophysiological studies of cochlear implants. Hear. Res. 34 (1988) 243-252
37. Schoesser, H., Zierhofer, C., Hochmair, E.S., 2001. Measuring electrically evoked compound action potentials using triphasic pulses for the reduction of the residual stimulation artifact. Conference on Implantable Auditory Prostheses. Asilomar.
38. Shallop J.K., VanDyke L., Goin D.W., and Mischke R.E. Prediction of behavioral thresholds and comfort values for nucleus 22-channel implant patients from electrical auditory brainstem response test results. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 100 11 (1991) 896-898
39. Smith D.W., Finley C.C., van den Honert C., Olszyk V.B., and Konrad K.E.M. Behavioral and electrophysiological responses to electrical stimulation in the cat. I. Absolute thresholds. Hear. Res. 81 (1994) 1-10
40. Shepherd R.K., and Javel E. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Effect of stimulus waveshape on single fiber response properties. Hear. Res. 130 (1999) 171-188
41. Stephan K., Welzl-Muller K., and Stiglbrunner H. Stapedius reflex growth function in cochlear implant patients. Audiology 29 1 (1990) 46-54
42. Van den Honert C., and Mortimer J.T. The response of the myelinated nerve fiber to short duration biphasic stimulating currents. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 7 (1979) 117-125
43. van den Honert C., and Stypulkowski P.H. Characterization of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (ABR) in cats and humans. Hear. Res. 21 2 (1986) 109-126
44. Viemeister N.F., and Wakefield G.H. Temporal integration and multiple looks. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 90 2 Pt 1 (1991) 858-865
45. Zwislocki J.J. Theory of temporal auditory summation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 32 (1960) 1046-1060