Effect of inter-phase gap on the sensitivity of cochlear implant users to electrical stimulation

Hearing Research

Volumn 205, Issue 1-2, 2005, Pages 210-224

  Carlyon, Robert P ^a   Van Wieringen, Astrid ^b   Deeks, John M ^a   Long, Christopher J ^a   Lyzenga, Johannes ^a,c   Wouters, Jan ^b  

^a MRC COGNITION AND BRAIN SCIENCES UNIT   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; Inter phase gap; Thresholds

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD SHIFT; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COCHLEAR NERVE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; HEARING ACUITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CATS; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; LOUDNESS PERCEPTION; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 20444466958     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2005.03.021     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Declaration of Helsinki, 1975. Recommendations guiding medical doctors in biomedical research involving human subjects. Adopted by the 18th World Medical Assembly, Helsinki, Finland, 1964 and revised by the 29th World Medical Assembly, Tokyo, Japan in 1975
2. I. Glass Tuning characteristics of cochlear nucleus units in response to electrical stimulation of the cochlea Hear. Res. 12 1983 223 227
3. N.Y.S. Kiang, and E.C. Moxon Physiological considerations in artificial stimulation of the inner ear Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 81 1972 714 730
4. J. Laneau, B. Boets, M. Moonen, A. van Wieringen, and J. Wouters A flexible auditory research platform using acoustic or electric stimuli for adults and young children J. Neurosci. Methods 142 2005 131 136
5. H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychophysics J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 49 1971 467 477
6. C.M. McKay, and K.R. Henshall The perceptual effects of interphase gap duration in cochlear implant stimulation Hear. Res. 181 2003 94 99
7. C.M. McKay, and H.J. McDermott Loudness perception with pulsatile electrical stimulation: The effect of interpulse intervals J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104 1998 1061 1074
8. A.L. Miller, D.W. Smith, and B.E. Pfingst Across-species comparisons of psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea: I. Sinusoidal stimuli Hear. Res. 134 1999 89 104
9. A.L. Miller, D.W. Smith, and B.E. Pfingst Across-species comparisons of psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea: II. Strength-duration functions for single, biphasic pulses Hear. Res. 135 1999 47 55
10. C.A. Miller, P.J. Abbas, B.K. Robinson, J.T. Rubinstein, and A.J. Matsuoka Electrically evoked single-fiber action potentials from cat: responses to monopolar, monophasic stimulation Hear. Res. 130 1999 197 218
11. C.A. Miller, B.K. Robinson, J.T. Rubinstein, P.J. Abbas, and C.L. Runge-Samuelson Auditory nerve responses to monophasic and biphasic electric stimuli Hear. Res. 151 2001 79 94
12. A.K. Moon, T.A. Zwolan, and B.E. Pfingst Effects of phase duration on detection of electrical stimulation of the human cochlea Hear. Res. 67 1993 166 178
13. C.Y. Ota, and R.S. Kimura Ultrastructural study of the human spiral ganglion Acta Otolaryngol. 89 1980 53 62
14. B.E. Pfingst Comparisons of psychophysical and neurophysiological studies of cochlear implants Hear. Res. 34 1988 243 252
15. F. Rattay, P. Lutter, and H. Felix A model of the electrically excited human cochlear neuron. I. Contribution of neural substructures to the generation and propagation of spikes Hear. Res. 153 2001 43 63
16. R.V. Shannon Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics Hear. Res. 11 1983 157 189
17. R.V. Shannon Thresholds and loudness functions for pulsatile stimulation of cochlear implants Hear. Res. 18 1985 135 143
18. R.V. Shannon A model of threshold for pulsatile stimulation of cochlear implants Hear. Res. 40 1989 197 204
19. R.V. Shannon Psychophysics R.S. Tyler Cochlear implants. Audiological foundations 1993 Singular San Diego 357 388
20. R. Shepherd, N. Linahan, J. Xu, G.M. Clark, and S. Araki Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve using non-charge-balanced stimuli Acta Otolaryngol. (Stockh.) 119 1999 674 684
21. R. Shepherd, R. Matsushima, E. Millard, and G.M. Clark Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation using non balanced stimuli Acta Otolaryngol. (Stockh.) 111 1991 848 860
22. R.K. Shepherd, and E. Javel Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Effect of stimulus waveshape on single fibre response properties Hear. Res. 130 1999 171 188
23. D.W. Smith, S. Watt, K.E.M. Konrad, and V.B. Olszyk Behavioral auditory thresholds for sinusoidal electrical stimuli in the cat J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98 1995 211 220
24. H. Spoendlin Degeneration behaviour of the cochlear nerve Arch. Klin. Exp. Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd. 200 1981 275 291
25. B. Swanson, P. Seligman, P. Carter, and Melbourne Impedance measurements of the Nucleus 22 electrode array in patients 1994 International Cochlear Implant, Speech and Hearing Symposium Melbourne, Australia
26. B. Townshend, N. Cotter, D.v. Compernolle, and R.L. White Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 82 1987 106 115
27. C. van den Honert, and P.H. Stypulkowski Temporal response patterns of single auditory-nerve fibers elicited by periodic electrical stimuli Hear. Res. 29 1987 207 222
28. A. van Wieringen, R.P. Carlyon, J. Laneau, and J. Wouters Effects of waveform shape on human sensitivity to electrical stimulation of the inner ear Hear. Res. 200 2005 73 86