Effects of stimulus manipulation on electrophysiological responses of pediatric cochlear implant users. Part II: Rate effects

Hearing Research

Volumn 244, Issue 1-2, 2008, Pages 15-24

  Davids, Taryn ^a,b   Valero, Jerome ^a   Papsin, Blake C ^a,b   Harrison, Robert V ^a,b   Gordon, Karen A ^a,b  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Behavioral thresholds; Cochlear implant; Electrical stimulation; Electrophysiological thresholds

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; BRAIN STEM RESPONSE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; EVOKED MIDDLE LATENCY RESPONSE; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; MALE; NERVE POTENTIAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TEMPORAL SUMMATION; THALAMOCORTICAL TRACT;

ADOLESCENT; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEURONS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 52149125092     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.06.010     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Abbas P.J., Brown C.J., Hughes M.L., Gantz B.J., Wolaver A.A., Gervais J.P., and Hong S.H. Electrically evoked compound action potentials recorded from subjects who use the nucleus CI24M device. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. Suppl. 185 (2000) 6-9
2. Abrams D.A., Nicol T., Zecker S.G., and Kraus N. Auditory brainstem timing predicts cerebral asymmetry for speech. J. Neurosci. 26 43 (2006) 11131-11137
3. Banai K., Abrams D., and Kraus N. Sensory-based learning disability: insights from brainstem processing of speech sounds. Int. J. Audiol. 46 9 (2007) 524-532
4. Brown C.J., Abbas P.J., Fryauf-Bertschy H., Kelsay D., and Gantz B. Intra-operative and post-operative electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in nucleus cochlear implant users: implications for the fitting process. Ear Hear. 15 (1994) 168-176
5. Brown C.J., Hughes M.L., Lopez S.M., and Abbas P.J. Relationship between EABR thresholds and levels used to program the CLARION speech processor. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. Suppl. 177 (1999) 50-57
6. Brown C.J., Hughes M.L., Luk B., Abbas P.J., Wolaver A., and Gervais J. The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the Nucleus 24 speech processor: data from adults. Ear Hear. 21 2 (2000) 151-163
7. Cafarelli Dees D., Dillier N., Lai W.K., von Wallenberg E., van Dijk B., Akdas F., Aksit M., Batman C., Beynon A., Burdo S., Chanal J.M., Collet L., Conway M., Coudert C., Craddock L., Cullington H., Deggouj N., Fraysse B., Grabel S., Kiefer J., Kiss J.G., Lenarz T., Mair A., Maune S., Muller-Deile J., Piron J.P., Razza S., Tasche C., Thai-Van H., Toth F., Truy E., Uziel A., and Smoorenburg G.F. Normative findings of electrically evoked compound action potential measurements using the neural response telemetry of the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant system. Audiol. Neurootol. 10 2 (2005) 105-116
8. Davids T., Valero J., Papsin B.C., Harrison R.V., and Gordon K.A. Effects of stimulus manipulation on electrophysiological responses in pediatric cochlear implant users. Part I: Duration effects. Hear. Res. 244 1-2 (2008) 7-14
9. Don M., Allen A.R., and Starr A. Effect of click rate on the latency of auditory brain stem responses in humans. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 86 2 Pt. 1 (1977) 186-195
10. Dynes, S.B.C., 1996. Discharge characteristics of auditory nerve fibers for pulsatile electrical stimuli. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
11. Firszt J.B., Rotz L.A., Chambers R.D., and Novak M.A. Electrically evoked potentials recorded in adult and pediatric CLARION implant users. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. Suppl. 177 (1999) 58-63
12. Galvin J.J., and Fu Q. Effects of stimulation rate, mode and level on modulation detection by cochlear implant users. JARO 6 (2005) 269-279
13. Gordon K.A., Papsin B.C., and Harrison R.V. Activity-dependent developmental plasticity of the auditory brainstem in children who use cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 24 6 (2003) 485-500
14. Gordon K.A., Papsin B.C., and Harrison R.V. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children. Ear Hear. 25 (2004) 447-463
15. Gordon K.A., Papsin B.C., and Harrison R.V. Programming cochlear implant stimulation levels in infants and children with a combination of objective measures. Int. J. Audiol. 43 Suppl. 1 (2004) S28-S32
16. Gordon K.A., Papsin B.C., and Harrison R.V. An evoked potential study of the developmental time course of the auditory nerve and brainstem in children using cochlear implants. Audiol. Neurootol. 11 1 (2006) 7-23
17. Gorga M.P., Johnson T.A., Kaminski J.R., Beauchaine K.L., Garner C.A., and Neely S.T. Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds. Ear Hear. 27 1 (2006) 60-74
18. Han D.M., Chen X.Q., Zhao X.T., Kong Y., Li Y.X., Liu S., Liu B., and Mo L.Y. Comparisons between neural response imaging thresholds, electrically evoked auditory reflex thresholds and most comfortable loudness levels in CII bionic ear users with HiResolution sound processing strategies. Acta Otolaryngol. 125 7 (2005) 732-735
19. Holden L.K., Skinner M.W., Holden T.A., and Demorest M.E. Effects of stimulation rate with the Nucleus 24 ACE speech coding strategy. Ear Hear. 23 (2002) 463-476
20. Hong R.S., and Rubinstein J.T. High-rate conditioning pulse trains in cochlear implants: dynamic range measures with sinusoidal stimuli. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114 6 (2003) 3327-3342
21. Huang C.Q., Shepherd R.K., Seligman P.M., and Clark G.M. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following acute electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates. III: Capacitive versus non-capacitive coupling of the stimulating electrodes. Hear. Res. 116 1-2 (1998) 55-64
22. Hughes M.L., Brown C.J., Abbas P.J., Wolaver A.A., and Gervais J.P. Comparison of EAP thresholds with MAP levels in the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant: data from children. Ear Hear. 21 2 (2000) 164-174
23. Johnson K.L., Nicol T.G., Zecker S.G., and Kraus N. Auditory brainstem correlates of perceptual timing deficits. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 19 3 (2007) 376-385
24. Keifer J., Hohl S., Sturzebecher E., et al. Comparison of speech recognition with different speech coding strategies (SPEAK, CIS, and ACE) and their relationship to telemetric measures of compound action potentials in the Nucleus CI 24M cochlear implant system. Audiology 40 (2001) 32-42
25. Kraus N., and McGee T. Clinical applications of the middle latency response. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 1 3 (1990) 130-133
26. Kraus N., and McGee T. The middle latency response generating system. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. Suppl. 44 (1995) 93-101
27. Kraus N., and Nicol T. Brainstem origins for cortical 'what' and 'where' pathways in the auditory system. Trends Neurosci. 28 4 (2005) 176-181
28. Kraus N., Ozdamar O., Hier D., and Stein L. Auditory middle latency responses (MLRs) in patients with cortical lesions. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 54 3 (1982) 275-287
29. Kreft H.A., Donaldson G.S., and Nelson D.A. Effects of pulse rate and electrode array design on intensity discrimination in cochlear implant user's. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116 4 (2004) 2258-2268
30. McGee T., and Kraus N. Auditory development reflected by middle latency response. Ear Hear. 17 5 (1996) 419-429
31. McKay C.M. The effect of rate of stimulation on perception of spectral shape by cochlear implants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118 1 (2005) 386-392
32. Miller C.A., Woodruff K.E., and Pfingst B.E. Functional responses from guinea pigs with cochlear implants. I: Electrophysiological and psychophysical measures. Hear. Res. 92 (1995) 85-99
33. Miller C.A., Faulkner M.J., and Pfingst B.E. Functional responses from guinea pigs with cochlear implants. II: Changes in electrophysiological and psychophysical measures over time. Hear. Res. 92 1-2 (1995) 100-111
34. Miller C.A., Abbas P.J., and Robinson B.K. Response properties of the refractory auditory nerve fiber. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2 (2001) 216-232
35. Pfingst B.E., and Morris D.J. Stimulus features affecting psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. II: Frequency and interpulse interval. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 94 (1993) 1287-1294
36. Picton T.W., Durieux-Smith A., and Moran L.M. Recording auditory brainstem responses from infants. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 28 2-3 (1994) 93-110
37. Rubinstein J.T. How cochlear implants encode speech. Curr. Opin. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 12 5 (2004) 444-448
38. Rubinstein J.T., Wilson B.S., Finely C.C., and Abbas P.J. Pseudospontaneous activity: stochastic independence of auditory nerve fibers with electrical stimulation. Hear. Res. 127 (1999) 108-118
39. Runge-Samuelson C.L., Abbas P.J., Rubinstein J.T., Miller C.A., and Robinson B.K. Response of the auditory nerve to sinusoidal electrical stimulation: effects of high-rate pulse trains. Hear. Res. 194 (2004) 1-13
40. Ryugo D.K., Rosenbaum B.T., Kim P.J., Niparko J.K., and Saada A.A. Single unit recordings in the auditory nerve of congenitally deaf white cats: morphological correlates in the cochlea and cochlear nucleus. J. Comp. Neurol. 397 4 (1998) 532-548
41. Shallop J.K., VanDyke L., Goin D.W., and Mischke R.E. Prediction of behavioral thresholds and comfort values for nucleus 22-channel implant patients from electrical auditory brainstem response test results. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 100 11 (1991) 896-898
42. Shannon R.V. Threshold and loudness functions for pulsatile stimulation of cochlear implants. Hear. Res. 18 (1985) 135-143
43. Shannon R.V., Zeng F.G., Kamath V., Wygonski J., and Ekelid M. Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science 270 (1995) 303-304
44. Sininger Y.S., and Abdala C. Hearing threshold as measured by auditory brain stem response in human neonates. Ear Hear. 17 5 (1996) 395-401
45. Smith D.W., Finley C.C., van den Honert C., Olszyk V.B., and Konrad K.E. Behavioral and electrophysiological responses to electrical stimulation in the cat. I: Absolute thresholds. Hear. Res. 81 1-2 (1994) 1-10
46. Song J.H., Banai K., Russo N.M., and Kraus N. On the relationship between speech- and nonspeech-evoked auditory brainstem responses. Audiol. Neurootol. 11 4 (2006) 233-241
47. Stapells D.R., and Oates P. Estimation of the pure-tone audiogram by the auditory brainstem response: a review. Audiol. Neurootol. 2 5 (1997) 257-280
48. Thornton A.R., and Coleman M.J. The adaptation of cochlear and brainstem auditory evoked potentials in humans. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 39 4 (1975) 399-406
49. Thornton A.R., and Slaven A. Auditory brainstem responses recorded at fast stimulation rates using maximum length sequences. Br. J. Audiol. 27 3 (1993) 205-210
50. Tykocinski M., Shepherd R.K., and Clark G.M. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates. Hear. Res. 88 1-2 (1995) 124-142
51. Tykocinski M., Shepherd R.K., and Clark G.M. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates. II: Comparison of fixed amplitude with amplitude modulated stimuli. Hear. Res. 112 1-2 (1997) 147-157
52. van den Honert C., and Stypulkowski P.H. Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. II: Single fiber recordings. Hear. Res. 14 3 (1984) 225-243
53. Vandali A.E., Whitford L.A., Plant K.L., and Clark G.M. Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. Ear Hear. 21 6 (2000) 608-624
54. Werner L.A., Folsom R.C., and Mancl L.R. The relationship between auditory brainstem response and behavioral thresholds in normal hearing infants and adults. Hear. Res. 68 1 (1993) 131-141
55. Wible B., Nicol T., and Kraus N. Correlation between brainstem and cortical auditory processes in normal and language-impaired children. Brain 128 Pt. 2 (2005) 417-423
56. Wilson B.S., Finley C.C., Lawson D., and Zerbi M. Temporal representations with cochlear implants. Am. J. Otol. 18 (1997) S3-34