Technology and institutions: Living in a material world

Theory and Society

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 461-483

  Pinch, Trevor ^a  

^a Rockefeller Hall 309 ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 52249108939     PISSN: 03042421     EISSN: 15737853     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11186-008-9069-x     Document Type: Article

References (110)

1. Akrich, M. (1992). The de-scription of technological objects. In W. Bijker, & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Alder, K. (1997). Engineering the revolution: Arms and enlightenment in France, 1763-1815. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
3. Arthur, B. W. (1988). Self-reinforcing mechanisms in economics. In P. W. Anderson, K. J. Arrow, & D. Pines (Eds.), The economy as an evolving complex system. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
4. Barley, S., & Orr, J. E. (1997). Between craft and science: Technical work in U.S. settings. Ithaca, NY: ILR University Press.
5. Bazerman, C. (1999). The language of Edison's light. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London and Newbury Park: Sage.
7. Bijker, W. E. (1995a). On bikes bulbs and bakelites. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.
8. Bijker, W. E. (1995b). Sociohistorical technical studies. In S. Jasanoff, G. Markle, J. Petersen, & T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 229-256). Beverly Hills: Sage.
9. Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. J. (Eds.) (1987). The social construction of technological systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Bijker, W. E., & Law, J. (Eds.) (1992). Shaping technology/building society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Bijsterveld, K., & Pinch, T. (2004). Sound studies: New technologies and music, special issue of Social Studies of Science, 34.
12. Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1984). The social construction of reality. London: Penguin.
13. D. Bloor 1999 Anti-latour Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 30 81 112
14. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Bourdieu, P. (1999). The logic of practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
16. Boczkowski, P. J. (2004). Digitizing the news: Innovation in on-line newspapers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Braverman, H. (1975). Labor and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century. New York: Monthly Review Press.
18. Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of Sty Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge (pp. 196-223). London: Routledge.
19. Callon, M., & Latour, B. (1992). Don't throw the baby out with the bath school: A reply to Collins and Yearley. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as culture and practice pp. 343-368. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. P. Carroll-Burke 2002 Material designs: Engineering cultures and engineering states-Ireland 1650-1900 Theory and Society 31 1 75 114
21. Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
22. Chadabe, J. (1997). Electric sound: The past and promise of electronic music. Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
23. H. M. Collins 1974 The TEA-Set: Tacit knowledge and scientific networks Science Studies 4 165 186
24. Collins, H. M. (1985). Changing order: Replication and induction in scientific practice. London: Sage.
25. H. M. Collins 2001 Tacit knowledge, trust, and the Q of sapphire Social Studies of Science 31 1 71 185
26. Collins, H. M., & Yearley, S. (1992). Epistemological chicken. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Knowledge as culture and practice (pp. 301-326). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. P. David 1985 Clio and the economics of QWERTY Economic History 75 227 332
28. Dimaggio, P., & Hargittai, E. (2001). From the 'Digital Divide' to 'Digital Inequality': Studying internet use as penetration increases. Princeton Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies, Working Paper #15.
29. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). Introduction. In W. W. Powell, & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 1-38). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30. Douglas, M. (1986). How institutions think. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
31. Fischer, C. (1992). America calling: A social history of the telephone to 1940. Berkeley: University of California Press.
32. N. Fligstein 2001 Social skill and the theory of fields Sociological Theory 19 2 105 125
33. Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back In: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell, & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 108-140). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
34. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
35. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books: New York.
36. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
37. T. F. Gieryn 1983 Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists American Sociological 48 781 795
38. Gieryn, T. F. (1999). Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
39. T. F. Gieryn 2002 What buildings do Theory and Society 31 1 35 74
40. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.
41. Goffman, E. (1961). Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Company.
42. M. Hannah U. Strohmayer 1991 Ornamentalism: Geography and the labor of the language of structuration theory Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 9 309 327
43. Harper, D. (1987). Working knowledge: Skill and community in a small shop. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
44. Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology and other essays. New York: Harper and Row.
45. Hughes, T. P. (1984). Networks of power: Electrification in western society, 1880-1930. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
46. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. Ignatieff, M. (1978). A just measure of pain: Penitentiaries in the industrial revolution, 1780-1850. London: Macmillan.
48. Jenkins, R. (1997). Technology and the market: George Eastman and the origins of mass Amateur Photography. In S. H. Cutcliffe, & T. S. Reynolds (Eds.), Technology and American history, a historical anthology from technology and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49. Jepperson, R. L. (1991). Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. In W. W. Powell, & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 143-163). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50. R. Kline T. Pinch 1996 Users as agents of technological change: The social construction of the automobile in the rural United States Technology and Culture 37 763 795
51. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52. Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54. B. Latour 1994 On technical mediation: Philosophy, sociology, genealogy Common Knowledge 3 2 29 64
55. B. Latour 1999 For David Bloor and beyond: A reply to David Bloor's anti-latour Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 30 113 129
56. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverley Hills: Sage.
57. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58. C. Leuenberger T. Pinch 2000 Social construction and neoinstitutional theory Journal of Management Inquiry 9 3 271 273
59. H. Mackay G. Gareth 1992 Extending the social shaping approach: Ideology and appropriation Social Studies of Science 22 685 716
60. D. [tmp] MacKenzie 1984 Marx and the machine Technology and Culture 25 473 508
61. MacKenzie, D. (1990). Inventing accuracy: A historical sociology of nuclear missile guidance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
62. MacKenzie, D., & Wajcman, J. (1985). The social shaping of technology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
63. J. G. March J. P. Olsen 1984 The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life American Political Science Review 78 3 734 749
64. Marx, L. (1994). The idea of 'Technology' and postmodern pessimism. In Y. Ezrahi, E. Mendelsohn, & H. Segal (Eds.), Technology, pessimism and postmodernity (pp. 11-28). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
65. Merton, R. K. (1970). Science, technology & society in seventeenth century England. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
66. Meyer, J. W., & Rown, B. (1991). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (pp. 41-62). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
67. M. S. Mizruchi L. C. Fein 1999 The social construction of organizational knowledge: A study in the uses of coercive, mimetic, and normative Isomorphism Administrative Science Quarterly 44 653 683
68. J. W. Mohr V. Duquenne 1997 The duality of culture and practice: Poverty relief in New York City, 1888-1917 Theory and Society 26 2-3 305 356
69. C. Mukerji 2002 Material practices of domination: Christian humanism, the built environment, and techniques of Western power Theory and Society 31 1 1 34
70. J. O'Connell 1993 Metrology: The creation of universality by the circulation of particulars Social Studies of Science 23 129 173
71. Ogburn, W. F. (1950). Social change with respect to culture and original nature. New York: Viking.
72. Orr, J. E. (1996). Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. Ithaca: ILR Press.
73. Oudshoorn, N. & Pinch, T. (Eds.) (2003). How users matter: The co-construction of users and technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
74. Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency and science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
75. Pinch, T. (1996). The social construction of technology: A review. In R. Fox (Ed.), Technological change: Methods and themes in the history of technology (pp. 17-36). Amsterdam: Harwood.
76. Pinch, T. (2001). Why you go to a piano store to buy a synthesizer: Path dependence and the social construction of technology. In R. Garud, & P. Karnoe (Eds.), Path Dependence and Creation (pp. 381-401). New Jersey: LEA Press.
77. Pinch, T. (2003). How the minimoog was sold to rock and roll. In N. Oudshoorn, & T. Pinch (2003) 247-720.
78. T. Pinch W. Bijker 1984 The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other Social Studies of Science 14 399 441
79. Pinch, T., & Trocco, F. (2002). Analog days: The invention and impact of the moog synthesizer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
80. Pinch, T., Ashmore, M., & Mulkay, M. (1992). Technology, testing, text: Clinical budgeting in the U.K. National Health Service. In W. Bijker, & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society (pp. 265-289). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
81. T. Pinch H. Collins L. Carbone 1996 Inside knowledge: Second order measures of skill Sociological Review 44 163 186
82. Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
83. Powell, W. W. (1991). Expanding the scope of institutional analysis. In W. W. Powell, & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 183-203). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
84. Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
85. Rader, K. (2004). Making mice: Standardizing animals for American biomedical research, 1900-1955. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
86. Ravetz, J. (1971). Scientific knowledge and its social problems. Oxford: Clarendon.
87. Rowland, N. J., & Gieryn, T. F. (2008). Transfer Troubles: Outsourcing Information Technology in Higher Education. In T. Pinch, and R. Swedberg (Eds.), Living in a material world: Economic Sociology meets Science and Technology Studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
88. Schaffer, S. (1992). Late victorian metrology and its instrumentation: A manufacture of ohms. In R. Bud, & S. Cozzens (Eds.), Invisible connections: Instruments, institutions and science (pp. 23-56). Bellingham, WA: SPIE Optical Engineering Press.
89. Scott, R. W. (1995). Institutions and organizations. London: Sage.
90. Searle, J. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York: Free Press.
91. J. Searle 2006 Social ontology: Some basic principles Anthropological Theory 6 1 12 29
92. W. H. Sewell 1992 A theory of structure: Duality, agency and transformation American Journal of Sociology 98 1 29
93. S. Shapin 1988 Understanding the Merton Thesis Isis 79 4 594 605
94. Soja, R. W. (1989). Postmodern geographies. London: Verso.
95. M. Sorper 1985 The spatial and temporal constitution of social action Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 3 407 424
96. Star, S. L., & Bowker, G. (1999). Sorting things out. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
97. S. L. Star J. R. Griesemer 1989 Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39 Social Studies of Science 19 387 420
98. Sterne, J. (2003). The audible past: Cultural origins of sound reproduction. Durham: Duke University Press.
99. Strathern, M. (1992). After nature: English kinship in the late twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
100. Suchmann, L. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
101. Théberge, P. (1997). Any sound you can imagine: Making music/consuming technology. Hanover: Wesleyan University Press.
102. Thompson, E. (2002). The Soundscape of modernity: Architectural acoustics and the culture of listening in America, 1900-1933. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
103. Turner, V. W. (1969). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
104. Von Hippel, E. (1988). The sources of innovations. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
105. Wajcman, J. (1991). Feminism confronts technology. College Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
106. Winner, L. (1977). Autonomous technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
107. Wittgenstein, L. (1973). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
108. S. Woolgar 1985 Why not a sociology of machines? The case of sociology and artificial intelligence Sociology 19 557 572
109. Woolgar, S. (1991). Configuring the user: The case of usability trials. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination (pp. 58-100). London: Routledge.
110. Yakubovich, V., Granovetter, M., & McGuire, P. (2004). Electric charges: The social construction of rate systems.