Midterm comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining versus -substituting total knee arthroplasty using the Genesis II prosthesis. A multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial

Knee

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 217-221

  Harato, Kengo ^a,b   Bourne, Robert B ^a   Victor, Jan ^c   Snyder, Mark ^d   Hart, John ^e   Ries, Michael D ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b KEIO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c Algemeen Ziekenhuis Sint Lucas Brugge   (Belgium)

^d Wellington Orthopaedic/Sports Med   (United States)

^e ALFRED HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Multicenter randomized trial; Posterior cruciate retaining; Posterior cruciate substituting; Postoperative range of motion; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE PROSTHESIS; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANGE OF MOTION; SCORING SYSTEM; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 42749086369     PISSN: 09680160     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2007.12.007     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Ritter M.A., Lutgring J.D., Davis K.E., Faris P.M., and Berend M.E. Total knee arthroplasty effectiveness in patients 55 years old and younger: osteoarthritis vs. rheumatoid arthritis. Knee 14 (2007) 9-11
2. Bourne R.B., Laskin R.S., and Guerin J.S. Ten-year results of the first 100 Genesis II total knee replacement procedures. Orthopedics 30 8 Suppl (2007) 83-85
3. Straw R., Kulkarni S., Attfield S., and Wilton T.J. Posterior cruciate ligament at total knee replacement. Essential, beneficial or a hindrance?. J Bone Jt Surg [Br] 85B (2003) 671-674
4. Conditt M.A., Noble P.C., Bertolusso R., Woody J., and Parsley B.S. The PCL significantly affects the functional outcome of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 19 7 suppl 2 (2004) 107-112
5. Siebel T., and Kafer W. In vitro investigation of knee joint kinematics following cruciate retaining versus cruciate sacrificing total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg 69 (2003) 433-440
6. Dorr L.D., Ochsner J.L., Gronley J., and Perry J. Functional comparison of posterior cruciate-retained versus cruciate-sacrificed total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 236 (1988) 36-43
7. Becker M.W., Insall J.N., and Faris P.M. Bilateral total knee arthroplasty. One cruciate retaining and one cruciate substituting. Clin Orthop 271 (1991) 122-124
8. Clark C.R., Rorabeck C.H., MacDonald S., MacDonald D., Swafford J., and Cleland D. Posterior-stabilized and cruciate-retaining total knee replacement: a randomized study. Clin Orthop 392 (2001) 208-212
9. Tanzer M., Smith K., and Burnett S. Posterior-stabilized versus cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: balancing the gap. J Arthroplast 17 (2002) 813-819
10. Maruyama S., Yoshiya S., Matsui N., Kuroda R., and Kurosaka M. Functional comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 19 (2004) 349-353
11. Udomkiat P., Meng B.J., Dorr L.D., and Wan Z. Functional comparison of posterior cruciate retention and substitution knee replacement. Clin Orthop 378 (2000) 192-201
12. Swanik C.B., Lephart S.M., and Rubash H.E. Proprioception, kinesthesia, and balance after total knee arthroplasty with cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized prostheses. J Bone Jt Surg [Am] 86A (2004) 328-334
13. Simmons S., Lephart S., Rubash H., Borsa P., and Barrack R.L. Proprioception following total knee arthroplasty with and without the posterior cruciate ligament. J Arthroplast 11 (1996) 763-768
14. Title C.I., Rodriguez J.A., and Ranawat C.S. Posterior cruciate-sacrificing versus posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty: a study of clinical and functional outcomes in matched patients. J Arthroplast 16 (2001) 409-414
15. Cope M.R., O'Brien B.S., and Nanu A.M. The influence of the posterior cruciate ligament in the maintenance of joint line in primary total knee arthroplasty: a radiologic study. J Arthroplast 17 (2002) 206-208
16. Ewald F.C. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop 248 (1989) 9-12
17. Li E., Ritter M.A., Moilanen T., and Freeman M.A. Total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 10 (1995) 560-568
18. Victor J., Banks S., and Bellemans J. Kinematics of posterior cruciate ligament-retaining and -substituting total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised outcome study. J Bone Jt Surg [Br] 87B (2005) 646-655
19. Hirsch H.S., Lotke P.A., and Morrison L.D. The posterior cruciate ligament in total knee surgery. Save, sacrifice, or substitute?. Clin Orthop 309 (1994) 64-68
20. Jacobs W.C., Clement D.J., and Wymenga A.B. Retention versus removal of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement: a systematic literature review within the Cochrane framework. Acta Orthop 76 (2005) 757-768
21. Laskin R.S., and Davis J. Total knee replacement using the Genesis II prosthesis: a 5-year follow up study of the first 100 consecutive cases. Knee 12 3 (2005) 163-167
22. Ishii Y., Matsuda Y., Sakata S., Onda N., and Omori G. Primary total knee arthroplasty using the Genesis I total knee prosthesis: a 5- to 10-year follow-up study. Knee 12 (2005) 341-345
23. Abbas D., and Gunn R.S. Medium-term results of the Scorpio total knee replacement. Knee 13 (2006) 307-311
24. Pritchett J.W. Patient preferences in knee prostheses. J Bone Jt Surg [Br] 86B (2004) 979-982
25. Misra A.N., Hussain M.R., Fiddian N.J., and Newton G. The role of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement. J Bone Jt Surg [Br] 85B (2003) 389-392
26. Lombardi Jr. A.V., Mallory T.H., Fada R.A., Hartman J.F., Capps S.G., Kefauver C.A., et al. An algorithm for the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 392 (2001) 75-87
27. Siebel T., and Kafer W. Modification of the posterior cruciate ligament tension following total knee arthroplasty: comparison of the Genesis CR and LCS meniscal bearing prostheses. Knee 11 (2004) 203-208
28. Omori G., Nishino K., Suzuki Y., Segawa H., Hayashi T., and Koga Y. Intraoperative measurements of knee motion in total knee arthroplasty. Knee 10 (2003) 75-79
29. Nelissen R.G., and Hogendoorn P.C. Retain or sacrifice the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty? A histopathological study of the cruciate ligament in osteoarthritic and rheumatoid disease. J Clin Pathol 54 (2001) 381-384
30. Stiehl J.B., Dennis D.A., Komistek R.D., and Keblish P.A. In vivo kinematic comparison of posterior cruciate ligament retention or sacrifice with a mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. Am J Knee Surg 13 (2000) 13-18
31. Matsueda M., Gengerke T.R., Murphy M., Lew W.D., and Gustilo R.B. Soft tissue release in total knee arthroplasty. Cadaver study using knees without deformities. Clin Orthop 366 (1999) 264-273