Patellofemoral overstuff and its relationship to flexion after total knee arthroplasty

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 449, Issue , 2006, Pages 283-287

  Mihalko, William ^a,b   Fishkin, Zair ^a   Krakow, Kenneth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; CADAVER; CONFERENCE PAPER; FEMUR; HUMAN; JOINT MOBILITY; KNEE FUNCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PATELLOFEMORAL OVERSTUFF; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL ANATOMY; THICKNESS; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KNEE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MIDDLE AGED; PATELLA; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; CADAVER; FEMUR; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MIDDLE AGED; PATELLA; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR;

EID: 33747198780     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000218756.89439.06     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Anouchi YS, McShane M, Kelly F Jr, Elting J, Stiehl J. Range of motion in total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;331:87-92.
2. Barrack RL, Burak C. Patella in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;389:62-73.
3. Barrack RL, Wolfe MW, Waldman DA, Milicic M, Bertot AJ, Myers L. Resurfacing of the patella in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1121-1131.
4. Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE. Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;356:144-153.
5. Boyd AD Jr, Ewald FC, Thomas WH, Poss R, Sledge CB. Long-term complications after total knee arthroplasty with or without resurfacing of the patella. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:674-681.
6. Brick GW, Scott RD. The patellofemoral component of total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;231:163-178.
7. Culp RW, Schmidt RG, Hanks G, Mak A, Esterhai JL Jr, Heppenstall RB. Supracondylar fracture of the femur following prosthetic knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;222:212-222.
8. D'Lima DD, Poole C, Chadha H, Hermida JC, Mahar A, Colwell CW Jr. Quadriceps moment arm and quadriceps forces after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;392:213-220.
9. Gatha NM, Clarke HD, Fuchs R, Scuderi GR, Insall JN. Factors affecting postoperative range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2004;17:196-202.
10. Gomes LS, Bechtold JE, Gustilo RB. Patellar prosthesis positioning in total knee arthroplasty: a roentgenographic study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;236:72-81.
11. Grood ES, Suntay WJ. A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng. 1983;105:136-144.
12. Kelly MA. Patellofemoral complications following total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2001;50:403-407.
13. Koh JS, Yeo SJ, Lee BP, Lo NN, Seow KH, Tan SK. Influence of patellar thickness on results of total knee arthroplasty: does a residual bony patellar thickness of < or = 12 mm lead to poorer clinical outcome and increased complication rates? J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:56-61.
14. Lesh ML, Schneider DJ, Deol G, Davis B, Jacobs CR, Pellegrini VD Jr. The consequences of anterior femoral notching in total knee arthroplasty: a biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:1096-1101.
15. Mahoney OM, McClung CD, dela Rosa MA, Schmalzried TP. The effect of total knee arthroplasty design on extensor mechanism function. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:416-421.
16. Maloney WJ, Schurman DJ. The effects of implant design on range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: total condylar versus posterior stabilized total condylar designs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;278:147-152.
17. Matsuda S, Ishinishi T, White SE, Whiteside LA. Patellofemoral joint after total knee arthroplasty: effect on contact area and contact stress. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:790-797.
18. Menke W, Schmitz B, Salm S. Range of motion after total condylar knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1992;111:280-281.
19. Oishi CS, Kaufman KR, Irby SE, Colwell CW Jr. Effects of patellar thickness on compression and shear forces in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;331:283-290.
20. Olcott CW, Scott RD. The Ranawat Award: Femoral component rotation during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;367:39-42.
21. Rand JA. The patellofemoral joint in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:612-620.
22. Ritter MA, Campbell ED. Effect of range of motion on the success of a total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1987;2:95-97.
23. Ritter MA, Thong AE, Keating EM, Faris PM, Meding JB, Berend ME, Pierson JL, Davis KE. The effect of femoral notching during total knee arthroplasty on the prevalence of post operative femoral fractures and on clinical outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:2411-2414.
24. Rowe PJ, Myles CM, Nutton R. The effect of total knee arthroplasty on joint movement during functional activities and joint range of motion with particular regard to higher flexion users. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2005;13:131-138.
25. Star MJ, Kaufman KR, Irby SE, Colwell CW Jr. The effects of patellar thickness on patellofemoral forces after resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;322:279-284.
26. Tew M, Forster IW, Wallace WA. Effect of total knee arthroplasty on maximal flexion. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;247:168-174.
27. Yoshii I, Whiteside LA, Anouchi YS. The effect of patellar button placement and femoral component design on patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;275:211-219.