Primary total knee arthroplasty in patients receiving workers' compensation benefits

Canadian Journal of Surgery

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 100-105

  De Beer, Justin ^a   Petruccelli, Danielle ^a,b   Gandhi, Rajiv ^a   Winemaker, Mitchell ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b HAMILTON HEALTH SCIENCES   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; CANADA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE PAIN; KNEE SOCIETY SCORE; MALE; OXFORD KNEE SCORE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WORK RESUMPTION; WORKMAN COMPENSATION; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECONOMICS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; LENGTH OF STAY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; CANADA; FEMALE; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WORKERS' COMPENSATION;

EID: 19144364148     PISSN: 0008428X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Atlas SJ, Chang Y, Kammann E, Keller RB, Deyo RA, Singer DE. Long-term disability and return to work among patients who have a herniated lumbar disc: the effect of disability compensation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000;82(1):4-15.
2. Klekamp J, McCarty E, Spenghler DM. Results of elective lumbar discectomy for patients involved in the workers' compensation system. J Spinal Disord 1998;11:277-82.
3. Young NJ, Shaffrey CI, Laws JR, Lovell LR. Lumbar disc surgery in a fixed compensation population: a model for influence of secondary gain on surgical outcome. Surg Neurol 1997;48(6):552-9.
4. Franklin GM, Jaug J, Heyer NJ, McKeefrey SP, Picciano JF. Outcome of lumbar fusion in Washington State workers' compensation. Spine 1994;19(17):1897-903.
5. Taylor VM, Deyo RA, Ciol M, Kreuter W. Surgical treatment of patients with back problems covered by workers compensation versus those with other sources of payment. Spine 1996;21(19):2255-9.
6. Hostin E, Mont MA, Mayerson JA, Jones LC, Hungerford DS. Total hip arthroplasty patients receiving workers' compensation. Clin Orthop 2000;(379):161-8.
7. Mont MA, Mayerson JA, Krackow KA, Hungerford DS. Total knee arthroplasty in patients receiving workers' compensation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998;80(9): 1285-90.
8. Brinker MR, Savory CG, Weeden SH, Aucoin HC, Curd DT. The results of total knee arthroplasty in workers' compensation patients. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 1998;57(2): 80-3.
9. Lonner JH, Hershman S, Mont M, Lotke PA. Total knee arthroplasty in patients 40 years of age and younger with osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop 2000;(380):85-90.
10. Insall JN, Hood RW, Flawn LB, Sullivan DJ. The total condylar knee prosthesis in gonarthrosis: a five to nine-year follow-up of the first one hundred consecutive replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1983; 65(5):619-28.
11. Parsley BS, Engh GA, Dwyer KA. Pre-operative flexion: Does it influence post-operative flexion after posterior-cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop 1992;(275):204-10.
12. Schurman DJ, Parker JN, Ornstein D. Total condylar knee replacement: a study of factors influencing range of motion as late as two years after arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985;67(7):1006-14.
13. Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL. ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology 1978; 49(4):239-43.
14. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998;80(1):63-9.
15. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 1989;(248):13-4.
16. Rand JA, Trousdale RT, Ilstrup DM, Harmsen WS. Factors affecting the durability of primary total knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85(2):259-65.
17. Bullens PHJ, van Loon CJM, de Waal Malefijt MC, Laan RFJM, Veth RPH. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a comparison between subjective and objective outcome assessments. J Arthroplasty 2001;16(6):740-7.
18. Lieberman JR, Dorey F, Shekelle P, Schumacher L, Thomas BJ, Kilgus DJ, et al. Differences between patients' and physicians' evaluations of outcome after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996;78(6):835-8.
19. Mancuso CA, Salvati EA, Johanson NA, Peterson MGE, Charlson ME. Patients' expectations and satisfaction with total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1997;12(4): 387-96.
20. Robertsson O, Dunbar MJ. Patient satisfaction compared with general health and disease-specific questionnaires in knee-arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16(4):476-82.