The relationship between femoral periprosthetic cortical bone geometry and porosity after total hip arthroplasty

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 87, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 107-115

  Rosenbaum Chou, Teri G ^a,b   Child, Jeremy R ^a   Naughtin, Ryan J ^a   Rigdon, Ryan R ^a   Schumann, Craig ^a   Bloebaum, Roy D ^a,b  

^a VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Area moments of inertia; Cortical bone; Geometry; Hip arthroplasty; Porosity

Indexed keywords

FRACTURE FIXATION; HIP PROSTHESES; POROSITY; TOOLS;

AREA MOMENTS OF INERTIA; CORTICAL BONE; CORTICAL BONES; FEMORAL COMPONENTS; FRACTURE RISKS; GEOMETRY; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; PRINCIPAL AXIS; STRESS SHIELDING; TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY;

BONE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE PROSTHESIS; BONE STRENGTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORTICAL BONE; FEMALE; FEMUR; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MALE; POROSITY; RIGIDITY; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FEMUR; HIP FRACTURES; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; OSTEOPOROSIS; POROSITY; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 51849146476     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.31702     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bloebaum RD, Liau DW, Lester DK, Rosenbaum TG. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurement and accuracy of bone mineral after unilateral total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006;21:612-622.
2. Kilgus DJ, Shimaoka EE, Tipton JS, Eberle RW. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurement of bone mineral density around porous-coated cementless femoral implants. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1993;75:279-287.
3. Engh CA, McGovern TF, Bobyn JD, Harris WH. A quantitative evaluation of periprosthetic bone-remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1992;74:1009-1020.
4. Sychterz CJ, Engh CA. The influence of clinical factors on periprosthetic bone remodeling. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; 322:285-292.
5. Maloney WJ, Sychterz C, Bragdon C, McGovern T, Jasty M, Engh CA, Harris WH. The Otto Aufranc Award. Skeletal response to well fixed femoral components inserted with and without cement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996;333:15-26.
6. Sychterz CJ, Topoleski LD, Sacco M, Engh CA Sr. Effect of femoral stiffness on bone remodeling after uncemented arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001;389:218-227.
7. Pitto RP, Schramm M, Hohmann D, Schmidt R. Clinical outcome and quantitative evaluation of periprosthetic bone-remodeling of an uncemented femoral component with taper design. A prospective study. Chir Organi Mov 2001;86:87-97.
8. Schmidt R, Muller L, Kress A, Hirschfelder H, Aplas A, Pitto RP. A computed tomography assessment of femoral and acetabular bone changes after total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2002;26:299-302.
9. McAuley JP, Sychterz CJ, Engh CA Sr. Influence of porous coating level on proximal femoral remodeling. A postmortem analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000;371:146-153.
10. Liau DW, Bloebaum RD, Lester DK. Bone Loss Caused by Femoral Component Due To Stress Shielding in Total Hip Arthroplasty. San Francisco, CA: The Moscone West Convention Center; 2004. 1336 p.
11. Rosenbaum TG, Bloebaum RD, Ashrafi S, Lester DK. Ambulatory activities maintain cortical bone after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;450:129-137.
12. Bouvy BM, Manley PA. Vascular and morphologic changes in canine femora after uncemented hip arthroplasty. Vet Surg 1993;22:18-26.
13. Manley PA, Vanderby R Jr, Kohles S, Markel MD, Heiner JP. Alterations in femoral strain, micromotion, cortical geometry, cortical porosity, and bony ingrowth in uncemented collared and collarless prostheses in the dog. J Arthroplasty 1995; 10:63-73.
14. Sumner DR, Turner TM, Urban RM, Galante JO. Remodeling and ingrowth of bone at two years in a canine cementless total hip-arthroplasty model. J Bone Joint Surg 1992;74:239-250.
15. Bergh MS, Muir P, Markel MD, Manley PA. Femoral bone adaptation to stable long-term cemented total hip arthroplasty in dogs. Vet Surg 2004;33:214-220.
16. Cristofolini L. A critical analysis of stress shielding evaluation of hip prostheses. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 1997;25:409-483.
17. Aamodt A, Lund-Larsen J, Eine J, Andersen E, Benum P, Husby OS. Changes in proximal femoral strain after insertion of uncemented standard and customised femoral stems. An experimental study in human femora. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2001;83:921-929.
18. Oh I, Harris WH. Proximal strain distribution in the loaded femur. An in vitro comparison of the distributions in the intact femur and after insertion of different hip-replacement femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978;60:75-85.
19. Dickenson RP, Hutton WC, Stott JRR. The mechanical properties of bone in osteoporosis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1981;63:233-239.
20. McCalden RW, McGeough JA, Barker MB, Court-Brown CM. Age-related changes in the tensile properties of cortical bone. The relative importance of changes in porosity, mineralization, and microstructure. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1993;75:1193-1205.
21. Currey JD. The effect of porosity and mineral content on the Young's modulus of elasticity of compact bone. J Biomech 1988;21:131-139.
22. Pytel A, Kiusalaas J. Engineering Mechanics Statics. Boston: Brooks/Cole; 1999. p 419-447.
23. Ammann P, Rizzoli R. Bone strength and its determinants. Osteoporos Int 2003;14(Suppl 3):S13-S18.
24. Wolff J. The Law of Bone Remodelling (Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen, Hirschwald). Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1892. p 3-100.
25. Frost HM. Bone "mass" and the "mechanostat": A proposal. Anat Rec 1987;219:1-9.
26. Lovejoy C, Burstein A, Heiple K. The biomechanical analysis of bone strength: A method and its application to platycnemia. Am J Phys Anthropol 1976;44:489-506.
27. Lazenby R. Porosity-geometry interaction in the conservation of bone strength. J Biomech 1986;19:257-258.
28. Ruff CB, Hayes WC. Cross-sectional geometry of Pecos Pueblo femora and tibiae - A biomechanical investigation. I. Method and general patterns of variation. Am J Phys Anthropol 1983;60:359-381.
29. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: Treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end stage results using a new method of evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1969;51:737-755.
30. Dorr LD, Faugere M-C, Mackel AM, Gruen TA, Bognar B, Malluche HH. Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. Bone 1993;14:231-242.
31. Lester K, Helm M. Mini-incision posterior approach for hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol 2001;13:263-271.
32. Emmanual J, Hornbeck C, Bloebaum RD. A polymethyl methacrylate method for large specimens of mineralized bone with implants. Stain Technol 1987;62:401-410.
33. Kuo TY, Skedros JG, Bloebaum RD. Comparison of human, primate, and canine femora: Implications for biomaterials testing in total hip replacement. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;40:475-489.
34. Nagurka ML, Hayes WC. An interactive graphics package for calculating cross-sectional properties of complex shapes. J Biomech 1980;13:59-64.
35. Skedros JG, Mason MW, Bloebaum RD. Differences in osteonal micromorphologies between tensile and compressive cortices of a bending skeletal system: Indications of potential strain-specific differences in bone microstructure. Anat Rec 1994;239:405-413.
36. Martin RB, Burr DB. Structure, Function, and Adaptation of Compact Bone. New York: Raven Press; 1986. p 1-261.
37. Dong XN, Guo XE. The dependence of transversely isotropic elasticity of human femoral cortical bone on porosity. J Biomech 2004;37:1281-1287.
38. Zioupos P. Ageing human bone: Factors affecting its biomechanical properties and the role of collagen. J Biomater Appl 2001;15:187-229.
39. Sundfeldt M, Carlsson LV, Johansson CB, Thomsen P, Gretzer C. Aseptic loosening, not only a question of wear: A review of different theories. Acta Orthop 2006;77:177-197.